Cited by 40Vitamin D Research StudiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

The efficacy of multivitamin, vitamin A, vitamin B, vitamin C, and vitamin D supplements in the prevention and management of COVID-19 and Long-COVID: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Open access
Sinopoli, Alessandra, Sciurti, Antonio, Isonne, Claudia, Santoro, Maria Mercedes, Baccolini, Valentina·2024·Nutrients

Abstract

This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of any vitamin administration(s) in preventing and managing COVID-19 and/or long-COVID. Databases were searched up to May 2023 to identify randomized clinical trials comparing data on the effects of vitamin supplementation(s) versus placebo or standard of care on the two conditions of interest. Inverse-variance random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality between supplemented and non-supplemented individuals. Overall, 37 articles were included: two regarded COVID-19 and long-COVID prevention and 35 records the COVID-19 management. The effects of vitamin D in preventing COVID-19 and long-COVID were contrasting. Similarly, no conclusion could be drawn on the efficacy of multivitamins, vitamin A, and vitamin B in COVID-19 management. A few positive findings were reported in some vitamin C trials but results were inconsistent in most outcomes, excluding all-cause mortality (RR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72–0.97). Vitamin D results were mixed in most aspects, including mortality, in which benefits were observed in regular administrations only (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49–0.91). Despite some benefits, results were mostly contradictory. Variety in recruitment and treatment protocols might explain this heterogeneity. Better-designed studies are needed to clarify these vitamins’ potential effects against SARS-CoV-2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu16091345

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are still limited meta-analyses on the role of nutrient supplementation in preventing COVID-19 and influenza.

    “Additionally, there are still limited meta-analyses on the role of nutrient supplementation in preventing COVID-19 and influenza.”

    From Comparative effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements in preventing respiratory tract infections among adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction says vitamin supplementation for preventing COVID-19 had not been systematically investigated, and the Discussion says COVID-19 prevention was little investigated. The paper mentions influenza only as an example of a viral illness; it does not assess whether meta-analyses on supplementation for influenza prevention are limited. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M.J. Welch V.A. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2019 978-1-119-53662-8
  2. [42]Thomas S. Patel D. Bittel B. Wolski K. Wang Q. Kumar A. Il’Giovine Z.J. Mehra R. McWilliams C. Nissen S.E. Effect of High-Dose Zinc and Ascorbic Acid Supplementation vs Usual Care on Symptom Length and Reduction Among Ambulatory Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The COVID A to Z Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Netw. Open 2021 4 e210369 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0369 33576820 PMC7881357 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinopoli, A., Sciurti, A., Isonne, C., Santoro, M. M., & Baccolini, V.
Affiliations
  • Local Health Authority Roma 1, Department of Prevention, 00193 Rome, Italy
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Sciurti, Antonio
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-04-29
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1345
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396519047
Cited by
40
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, long COVID, vitamin supplementation, multivitamins, vitamin A, B vitamins, vitamin C, vitamin D, SARS-CoV-2, all-cause mortality, prevention, disease management
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Ascorbic Acid, Humans, Vitamin A, Vitamin B Complex, Vitamin D, Vitamins, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review