Measurement Instruments Used to Assess Caregiver Burden in Informal Caregivers of Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Background/Objectives: Caregiver burden is a relevant dimension of the caregiving experience among informal caregivers of cancer patients and is associated with psychological, physical, and social consequences. Although several instruments are available to assess the phenomenon, there is still limited consistency in the tools used across empirical oncology studies. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO up to February 2026. Quantitative studies assessing caregiver burden using standardized instruments in informal caregivers of adult cancer patients were included. Results: Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. The most frequently used instruments were the Zarit Burden Interview, followed by the Caregiver Burden Inventory. Less frequently used instruments included the Caregiver Reaction Assessment and the Caregiver Burden Scale. Most included studies relied on generic caregiver burden instruments originally developed outside oncology-specific contexts. Conclusions: Considerable heterogeneity exists in the instruments used to assess caregiver burden in oncology research. Empirical studies continue to rely predominantly on generic caregiver burden scales, while oncology-specific tools appear to be underused. Greater consistency in instrument selection may improve comparability across studies and support the integration of caregiver assessment into oncology practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The review protocol was drawn up in accordance with PRISMA-P and registered a priori on the PROSPERO website (CRD420261320586) [17,18].”
Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer
Stenberg, U., Ruland, C. M., & Miaskowski, C. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1670 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Burdens among Caregivers of Older Adults with Advanced Cancer and Risk Factors
Chindaprasirt, J., Limpawattana, P., Pakkaratho, P., Wirasorn, K., Sookprasert, A., Kongbunkiat, K., & Sawanyawisuth, K. (2014) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1643 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Alsirafy, S. A., Nagy, R., Hassan, A. D., Fawzy, R., Abdelhafeez, A. A. M., Husein, M. O., Almashiakhi, M. A., Alabdullateef, S. H., Alghamdi, S. A., & Elyamany, A. M. (2021) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-021-00857-5 · Cited by 30 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In particular, the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA), and the Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) were the most frequently used tools across the included studies [8–10 , 20– 29].”
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Cerrone, V., Capasso, R., Cascella, M., Rubbi, I., Gisi, A. D., Di Santo, P., & Andretta, V.
- Affiliations
- AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona (IT)
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
- University of Salerno (IT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- UOS SPS Direzione Sanitaria, AORN San Giuseppe Moscati, 83100 Avellino, Italy
- Corresponding author
- Andretta, Vincenzo
- Venue
- Nursing Reports
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-05-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 172
- ISSN
- 2039-439X (ISSN-L)
- 2039-4403
- OpenAlex
- W7161648500
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nursing Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, informal caregivers, adult cancer patients, measurement instruments, Zarit Burden Interview, Caregiver Burden Inventory, Caregiver Reaction Assessment, Caregiver Burden Scale
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review