Cited by 10Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchBiomedical Ethics and RegulationResearch Data Management Practices

Organoids as Miniature Twins—Challenges for Comparability and Need for Data Standardization and Access

Open access
Fuhr, Antonie, Kurtz, Andreas, Hiepen, Christian, Müller, Sabine·2022·Organoids

Abstract

Organoids derived from human stem cell lines represent genetically mostly identical models of their donors. Their use as personalized in vitro miniature twins of living individuals creates challenges of reproducibility, comparability and standardization. To fully exploit personalization, it is essential to assess individual variabilities in organoid function, morphology or maturity. There is a need to establish platforms to compare individual organoids and to link them to data elements related to the individual donor. Moreover, principal ethical issues arise because of their infinite repetition for an unlimited period of time and global dissemination. This infinite temporal and spatial space applies to the biological material but also to the data associated with it. It increases the possibility of uses that are unpredictable at the time of donation, and thus, beyond the donor’s consented choices. We propose an open data platform to address the issue of authenticity and persistent comparability of the biological organoid models, and of preserving the ethical provenance information. The platform would collect standardized donors, organoids and ethical information to create a system suitable for quality control of individual organoids. We discuss whether the human pluripotent stem cell registry (hPSCreg), a well-established resource for stem cell data, provides a suitable model platform.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/organoids1010003

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gene Expression Omnibus is generally recommended for transcriptomics-related organoid data.

    “For transcriptomics-related data, such as gene expression, non-coding RNA, ChIP, genome methylation, high-throughput RT-PCR, SNP arrays, SAGE, protein arrays, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is generally recommended231,232.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [231]

    Section 2 discusses standardizing organoid data and depositing it in a transparent database; the Conclusions discuss hPSCreg as a possible platform. Neither passage recommends Gene Expression Omnibus for transcriptomics-related data. Searches for GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus, and the listed data types found no passage addressing that recommendation. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuhr, A., Kurtz, A., Hiepen, C., & Müller, S.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), Joseph-von-Fraunhofer-Weg 1, 66280 Sulzbach, Germany
Venue
Organoids
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-04-09
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
28-36
ISSN
2674-1172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223594616
Cited by
10
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organoids (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Union (726320)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
human pluripotent stem cells, personalized medicine, reproducibility, comparability, data standardization, open data portals, donor consent, quality control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review