CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsSteroid Chemistry and BiochemistryActinomycetales infections and treatment

Responses to Ecopollutants and Pathogenization Risks of Saprotrophic Rhodococcus Species

Open access
Ivshina, Irina B., Kuyukina, Maria S., Krivoruchko, Anastasiia V., Tyumina, Elena A.·2021·Pathogens
DOI 10.3390/pathogens10080974PMC PMC8398200
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Under conditions of increasing environmental pollution, true saprophytes are capable of changing their survival strategies and demonstrating certain pathogenicity factors. Actinobacteria of the genus Rhodococcus, typical soil and aquatic biotope inhabitants, are characterized by high ecological plasticity and a wide range of oxidized organic substrates, including hydrocarbons and their derivatives. Their cell adaptations, such as the ability of adhering and colonizing surfaces, a complex life cycle, formation of resting cells and capsule-like structures, diauxotrophy, and a rigid cell wall, developed against the negative effects of anthropogenic pollutants are discussed and the risks of possible pathogenization of free-living saprotrophic Rhodococcus species are proposed. Due to universal adaptation features, Rhodococcus species are among the candidates, if further anthropogenic pressure increases, to move into the group of potentially pathogenic organisms with “unprofessional” parasitism, and to join an expanding list of infectious agents as facultative or occasional parasites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/pathogens10080974

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rhodococci metabolize various xenobiotic substances, encompassing aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, oxygenated chemicals, halogenated substances, and herbicides.

    “They metabolize various xenobiotic substances,”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [162]

    The Introduction reports that isolated Rhodococcus strains biodegrade aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, oxygenated and halogenated compounds, and organochlorine pesticides. It supports the broad statement that rhodococci metabolize various xenobiotics, but it does not specifically identify herbicides among the substances degraded. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 150

  1. [1]Goodfellow M. Phylum XXVI. Actinobacteria phyl. nov Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2nd ed. Goodfellow M. Kämpfer P. Busse H.-J. Trujillo M.E. Suzuki K. Ludwig W. Whitman W.B. Springer New York, NY, USA 2012 Volume 5 33 34
  2. [2]Jones A.L. Goodfellow M. Rhodococcus (Zopf 1891) emend. Goodfellow, Alderson and Chun 1998a Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria, Digital ed. Trujillo M.E. Dedysh S. DeVos P. Hedlund B. Kämpfer P. Rainey F.A. Whitman W.B. John Wiley & Sons New York, NY, USA 2015 1 50
  3. [3]Gupta R.S. Commentary: Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria Front. Microbiol. 2019 10 206 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00206 30853945 PMC6395429 · DOI
  4. [4]Busch H. Hagedoorn P.-L. Hanefeld U. Rhodococcus as a versatile biocatalyst in organic synthesis Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 4787 10.3390/ijms20194787 PMC6801914 31561555 · DOI
  5. [5]Ivshina I.B. Tyumina E.A. Kuzmina M.V. Vikhareva E.V. Features of diclofenac biodegradation by Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 346 Sci. Rep. 2019 9 9159 10.1038/s41598-019-45732-9 31235798 PMC6591480 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Garrido-Sanz D. Redondo-Nieto M. Martín M. Rivilla R. Comparative genomics of the Rhodococcus genus shows wide distribution of biodegradation traits Microorganisms 2020 8 774 10.3390/microorganisms8050774 PMC7285261 32455698 · DOI
  7. [7]Alvarez H.M. Silva R.A. Cesari A.C. Zamit A.L. Peressutti S.R. Reichelt R. Keller U. Malkus U. Rasch C. Maskow T. Physiolosgical and morphological responses of the soil bacterium Rhodococcus opacus strain PD630 to water stress FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004 50 75 86 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.06.002 19712366 · DOI
  8. [8]LeBlanc J.C. Gonçalves E.R. Mohn W.W. Global response to desiccation stress in the soil actinomycete Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008 74 2627 2636 10.1128/AEM.02711-07 18326668 PMC2394902 · DOI
  9. [9]Fanget N.V. Foley S. Starvation/stationary-phase survival of Rhodococcus 1454 erythropolis SQ1: A physiological and genetic analysis Arch. Microbiol. 2011 193 1 13 10.1007/s00203-010-0638-9 20967536 · DOI
  10. [10]Corno G. Coci M. Giardina M. Plechuk S. Campanile F. Stefani S. Antibiotics promote aggregation within aquatic bacterial communities Front. Microbiol. 2014 5 297 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00297 25071728 PMC4077313 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [11]Su X. Sun F. Wang Y. Hashmi M.Z. Guo L. Ding L. Shen C. Identification, characterization and molecular analysis of the viable but nonculturable Rhodococcus biphenylivorans Sci. Rep. 2015 5 18590 10.1038/srep18590 26687808 PMC4685647 · DOI
  12. [12]Röttig A. Hauschild P. Madkour M.H. Al-Ansari A.M. Almakishah N.H. Steinbüchel A. Analysis and optimization of triacylglycerol synthesis in novel oleaginous Rhodococcus and Streptomyces strains isolated from desert soil J. Biotechnol. 2016 225 48 56 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.03.040 27034020 · DOI
  13. [13]Zhang C. Yang L. Ding Y. Wang Y. Lan L. Ma Q. Chi X. Wei P. Zhao Y. Steinbüchel A. Bacterial lipid droplets bind to DNA via an intermediary protein that enhances survival under stress Nat. Commun. 2017 8 15979 10.1038/ncomms15979 28681845 PMC5504291 · DOI
  14. [14]Raymond-Bouchard I. Tremblay J. Altshuler I. Greer C.W. Whyte L.G. Comparative transcriptomics of cold growth and adaptive features of a eury- and steno-psychrophile Front. Microbiol. 2018 9 1565 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01565 30108551 PMC6080646 · DOI
  15. [15]Firrincieli A. Presentato A. Favoino G. Marabottini R. Allevato E. Stazi S.-R. Mugnozza G.-S. Harfouche A. Petruccioli M. Turner R.J. Identification of resistance genes and response to arsenic in Rhodococcus aetherivorans BCP1 Front. Microbiol. 2019 110 888 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00888 PMC6514093 31133997 · DOI
  16. [16]Cappelletti M. Presentato A. Piacenza E. Firrincieli A. Turner R.J. Zannon D. Biotechnology of Rhodococcus for the production of valuable compounds Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020 104 8567 8594 10.1007/s00253-020-10861-z 32918579 PMC7502451 · DOI
  17. [17]Hu X. Li D. Qiao Y. Song Q. Guan Z. Qiu K. Cao J. Huang L. Salt tolerance mechanism of a hydrocarbon-degrading strain: Salt tolerance mediated by accumulated betaine in cells J. Hazard. Mater. 2020 392 122326 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122326 32092654 · DOI
  18. [18]Sundararaghavan A. Mukherjee A. Suraishkumar G.K. Investigating the potential use of an oleaginous bacterium, Rhodococcus opacus PD630, for nano-TiO2 remediation Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020 27 27394 27406 10.1007/s11356-019-06388-0 31493086 · DOI
  19. [19]Wang C. Chen Y. Zhou H. Li X. Tan Z. Adaptation mechanisms of Rhodococcus sp. CNS16 under different temperature gradients: Physiological and transcriptome Chemosphere 2020 238 124571 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124571 31472351 · DOI
  20. [20]Pátek M. Grulich M. Nešvera J. Stress response in Rhodococcus strains Biotechnol. Adv. 2021 107698 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107698 33515672 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [21]Goodfellow M. Jones A.L. Maldonado L.A. Salanitro J. Rhodococcus aetherivorans sp. nov., a new species that contains methyl t-butyl ether-degrading actinomycetes Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004 27 61 65 10.1078/0723-2020-00254 15053322 · DOI
  22. [22]de Carvalho C.C.C.R. Costa S.S. Fernandes P. Couto I. Viveiros M. Membrane transport systems and the biodegradation potential and pathogenicity of genus Rhodococcus Front. Physiol. 2014 5 133 10.3389/fphys.2014.00133 24772091 PMC3983516 · DOI
  23. [23]Ivshina I.B. Kuyukina M.S. Krivoruchko A.V. Hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria and their potential in eco-biotechnology and bioremediation Microbial Resources: From Functional Existence in Nature to Industrial Applications Kurtböke I. Elsevier New York, NY, USA 2017 121 148
  24. [24]Cappelletti M. Fedi S. Zannoni D. Degradation of alkanes in Rhodococcus Biology of Rhodococcus. Microbiology Monographs 2nd ed. Alvarez H.M. Springer Nature Cham, Switzerland 2019 Volume 16 137 171
  25. [25]Acosta-González A. Martirani-von Abercron S.-M. Rosselló-Móra R. Wittich R.M. Marqués S. The effect of oil spills on the bacterial diversity and catabolic function in coastal sediments: A case study on the Prestige oil spill Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016 22 15200 15214 10.1007/s11356-015-4458-y 25869434 · DOI
  26. [26]Kuyukina M.S. Ivshina I.B. Bioremediation of contaminated environments using Rhodococcus Biology of Rhodococcus. Microbiology Monographs 2nd ed. Alvarez H.M. Springer Nature Cham, Switzerland 2019 Volume 16 231 270
  27. [27]Voronina E. Balandina A. Frolova N. Dubrovina S. Loginova T. Effect of benzo(a)pyrene on the number of soil microorganisms of the genus Pseudomonas and Rhodococcus IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science IOP Publishing Bristol, UK 2021 Volume 723 042010
  28. [28]Bej A.K. Cold-tolerant alkane-degrading Rhodococcus species from Antarctica Pol. Biol. 2000 23 100 105 10.1007/s003000050014 · DOI
  29. [29]de Carvalho C.C.C.R. Adaptation of Rhodococcus erythropolis cells for growth and bioremediation under extreme conditions Res. Microbiol. 2012 163 125 136 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.11.003 22146587 · DOI
  30. [30]Goordial J. Raymond-Bouchard I. Zolotarov Y. de Bethencourt L. Ronholm J. Shapiro N. Woyke T. Stromvik M. Greer C.W. Bakermans C. Cold adaptive traits revealed by comparative genomic analysis of the eurypsychrophile Rhodococcus sp. JG3 isolated from high elevation McMurdo Dry Valley permafrost, Antarctica FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016 92 fiv154 26637477
  31. [31]Ivshina I.B. Current situation and challenges of specialized microbial resource centres in Russia Microbiology 2012 81 509 516 10.1134/S0026261712050098 23234065 · DOI
  32. [33]Cuello O.H. Caorlin M.J. Reviglio V.E. Carvajal L. Juarez C.P. de Guerra E.P. Luna J.D. Rhodococcus globerulus keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis J. Cat. Refr. Surg. 2002 28 2235 2237 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01347-5 12498868 · DOI
  33. [34]Jones A.L. Rhodococcus gordoniae sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from clinical material and phenol-contaminated soil Inter. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004 54 407 411 10.1099/ijs.0.02756-0 15023952 · DOI
  34. [35]Letek M. Gonzalez P. MacArthur I. Rodriguez H. Freeman T.C. Valero-Rello A. Blonco M. Buckley T. Cherevach I. Fahey R. The genome of a pathogenic Rhodococcus: Cooptive virulence underpinned by key gene acquisitions PLoS Genet. 2010 6 e1001145 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001145 20941392 PMC2947987 · DOI
  35. [36]Ng S. King C.S. Hang J. Clifford R. Lesho E.P. Kuschner R.A. Cox E.D. Stelsel R. Mody R. Severe cavitary pneumonia caused by a non-egui Rhodococcus species in an immunocompetent patient Respir. Care 2013 58 47 50 23051922
  36. [37]Anastasi E. MacArthur I. Scortti M. Alvarez S. Giguère S. Vázquez-Boland J.A. Pangenome and phylogenomic analysis of the pathogenic actinobacterium Rhodococcus equi GBE 2016 8 3140 3148 27638249 PMC5174736
  37. [38]Rahdar H.A. Mahmoudi S. Bahador A. Ghiasvand F. Heravi F.S. Feizabadi M.M. Molecular identification and antibiotic resistance pattern of actinomycetes isolates among immunocompromised patients in Iran, emerging of new infections Sci. Rep. 2021 11 10745 10.1038/s41598-021-90269-5 34031507 PMC8144606 · DOI
  38. [39]Luz A.P. Pellizari V.H. Whyte L.G. Greer C.W. A survey of indigenous microbial hydrocarbon degradation genes in soils from Antarctica and Brazil Can. J. Microbiol. 2004 50 323 333 10.1139/w04-008 15213740 · DOI
  39. [40]Sheng H.M. Gao H.S. Xue L.G. Ding S. Song C.L. Feng H.Y. An L.Z. Analysis of the composition and characteristics of culturable endophytic bacteria within subnival plants of the Tianshan Mountains, northwestern China Curr. Microbiol. 2011 62 923 932 10.1007/s00284-010-9800-5 21061126 · DOI
  40. [41]Hassanshahian M. Ahmadinejad M. Tebyanian H. Kariminik A. Isolation and characterization of alkane degrading bacteria from petroleum reservoir waste water in Iran (Kerman and Tehran provenances) Mar. Pollut. Bullet. 2013 73 300 305 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.05.002 23790464 · DOI
  41. [42]Konishi M. Nishi S. Fukuoka T. Kitamoto D. Watsuji T.-O. Nagano Y. Yabuki A. Nakagawa S. Hatada Y. Horiuchi J.-I. Deep-sea Rhodococcus sp. BS-15, lacking the phytopathogenic fas genes, produces a novel glucotriose lipid biosurfactant Mar. Biotechnol. 2014 16 484 493 10.1007/s10126-014-9568-x 24510374 · DOI
  42. [43]Mikolasch A. Omirbekova A. Schumann P. Reinhard A. Sheikhany H. Berzhanova R. Mukasheva T. Schauer F. Enrichment of aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic acids by oil-degrading bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of plants growing in oil-contaminated soil from Kazakhstan Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015 99 4071 4084 10.1007/s00253-014-6320-4 25592733 · DOI
  43. [44]Viggor S. Jõesaar M. Vedler E. Kiiker R. Pärnpuu L. Heinaru A. Occurrence of diverse alkane hydroxylase alkB genes in indigenous oil-degrading bacteria of Baltic Sea surface water Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015 101 507 516 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.064 26541986 · DOI
  44. [45]Sinha R.K. Krishnan K.P. Hatha A.A. Rahiman M. Thresyamma D.D. Kerkar S. Diversity of retrievable heterotrophic bacteria in Kongsfjorden, an Arctic fjord Braz. J. Microbiol. 2017 48 51 61 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.011 28029589 PMC5221401 · DOI
  45. [46]Auta H.S. Emenike C.U. Jayanthi B. Fauziah S.H. Growth kinetics and biodeterioration of polypropylene microplastics by Bacillus sp. and Rhodococcus sp. isolated from mangrove sediment Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018 127 15 21 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.036 29475646 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [47]Habib S. Ahmad S.A. Johari W.L.W. Shukor M.Y.A. Alias S.A. Khalil K.A. Yasid N.A. Evaluation of conventional and response surface level optimisation of n-dodecane (n-C12) mineralisation by psychrotolerant strains isolated from pristine soil at Southern Victoria Island, Antarctica Microb. Cell Fact. 2018 17 44 10.1186/s12934-018-0889-8 29549881 PMC5857080 · DOI
  47. [48]Yuste L. Corbella M.E. Turiégano M.J. Karlson U. Puyet A. Rojo F. Characterization of bacterial strains able to grow on high molecular mass residues from crude oil processing FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2000 32 69 75 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00700.x 10779621 · DOI
  48. [49]Hamamura N. Olson S.H. Ward D.M. Inskeep W.P. Microbial population dynamics associated with crude-oil biodegradation in diverse soils Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006 72 6316 6324 10.1128/AEM.01015-06 16957258 PMC1563594 · DOI
  49. [50]de Oliveira V.M. Sette L.D. Simioni K.C.M. Santos Neto E.V.D. Bacterial diversity characterization in petroleum samples from Brazilian reservoirs Braz. J. Microbiol. 2008 39 445 452 10.1590/S1517-83822008000300007 24031244 PMC3768447 · DOI
  50. [51]Li J. Zhao G.-Z. Long L.-J. Wang F.-Z. Tian X.-P. Zhang S. Li W.-J. Rhodococcus nanhaiensis sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from marine sediment Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012 62 2517 2521 10.1099/ijs.0.038067-0 22180608 · DOI
  51. [52]Urbano S.B. Albarracín V.H. Ordoñez O.F. Farías M.E. Alvarez H.M. Lipid storage in high-altitude Andean Lakes extremophiles and its mobilization under stress conditions in Rhodococcus sp. A5, a UV-resistant actinobacterium Extremophiles 2013 17 217 227 10.1007/s00792-012-0508-2 23283521 · DOI
  52. [53]Dastager S.G. Mawlankar R. Tang S.-K. Krishnamurthi S. Ramana V.V. Joseph N. Shouche Y.S. Rhodococcus enclensis sp. nov., a novel member of the genus Rhodococcus Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014 64 2693 2699 10.1099/ijs.0.061390-0 24854006 · DOI
  53. [54]Ivshina I.B. Kuyukina M.S. Krivoruchko A.V. Barbe V. Fischer C. Draft genome sequence of propane- and butane-oxidizing actinobacterium Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 Genome Announc. 2014 2 e01297-14 10.1128/genomeA.01297-14 25502680 PMC4263842 · DOI
  54. [55]Hwang C.Y. Lee I. Cho Y. Lee Y.M. Baek K. Jung Y.J. Yang Y.Y. Lee T. Rhee T.S. Lee H.K. Rhodococcus aerolatus sp. nov., isolated from subarctic rainwater Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015 65 465 471 10.1099/ijs.0.070086-0 25385992 · DOI
  55. [56]Aggarwal R.K. Dawar C. Phanindranath R. Mutnuri L. Dayal A.M. Draft genome sequence of a versatile hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium, Rhodococcus pyridinivorans strain KG-16, collected from oil fields in India Genome Announc. 2016 4 e01704-15 10.1128/genomeA.01704-15 26868394 PMC4751318 · DOI
  56. [57]Táncsics A. Máthe I. Benedek T. Toth E.M. Atasayar E. Sproer C. Márialigeti K. Felfoldi T. Kriszt B. Rhodococcus sovatensis sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from the hypersaline and heliothermal Lake Ursu Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017 67 190 196 10.1099/ijsem.0.001514 27902266 · DOI
  57. [58]Ramaprasad E.V.V. Mahidhara G. Sasikala C. Ramana C.V. Rhodococcus electrodiphilus sp. nov., a marine electro active actinobacterium isolated from coral reef Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018 68 2644 2649 10.1099/ijsem.0.002895 29957174 · DOI
  58. [59]Campbell C.A. Beiderbeck V.O. Warder F.G. Influence of simulated fall and sping conditions on the soil system. III. Effect of method of simulating spring temperatures of ammonification, nitrification and microbial populations Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1973 37 382 386 10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700030021x · DOI
  59. [61]Zhao G.-Z. Li J. Zhu W.-Y. Tian S.-Z. Zhao L.-X. Yang L.-L. Xu L.-H. Li W.-J. Rhodococcus artemisiae sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from the pharmaceutical plant Artemisia annua L Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012 62 900 905 10.1099/ijs.0.031930-0 21642485 · DOI
  60. [62]Kämpfer P. Wellner S. Lohse K. Lodders N. Martin K. Rhodococcus cerastii sp. nov. and Rhodococcus trifolii sp. nov., two novel species isolated from leaf surfaces Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013 63 1024 1029 10.1099/ijs.0.044958-0 22685110 · DOI
  61. [63]Ma J. Zhang L. Wang G. Zhang S. Zhang X. Wang Y. Shi C. Si L. Zhao H. Liu F. Rhodococcus gannanensis sp. nov., a novel endophytic actinobacterium isolated from root of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017 110 1113 1120 10.1007/s10482-017-0884-9 28488064 · DOI
  62. [64]Silva L.J. Souza D.T. Genuario D.B. Hoyos H.A.V. Santos S.N. Rosa L.H. Zucchi T.D. Melo I.S. Rhodococcus psychrotolerans sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere of Deschampsia antarctica Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2018 111 629 636 10.1007/s10482-017-0983-7 29143212 · DOI
  63. [65]Li C. Cao P. Jiang M. Hou Y. Du C. Xiang W. Zhao J. Wang X. Rhodococcus oryzae sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from rhizosphere soil of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020 70 3300 3308 10.1099/ijsem.0.004171 32375931 · DOI
  64. [66]Hamedi J. Mohammadipanah F. Biotechnological application and taxonomical distribution of plant growth promoting actinobacteria J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015 42 157 171 10.1007/s10295-014-1537-x 25410828 · DOI
  65. [67]Stes E. Francis I. Pertry I. Dolzblasz A. Depuydt S. Vereecke D. The leafy gall syndrome induced by Rhodococcus fascians FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013 342 187 194 10.1111/1574-6968.12119 23480693 · DOI
  66. [68]Creason A.L. Vandeputte O.M. Savory E.A. Davis E.W. Putnam M.L. Hu E. Swader-Hines D. Mol A. Baucher M. Prinsen E. Analysis of genome sequences from plant pathogenic Rhodococcus reveals genetic novelties in virulence loci PLoS ONE 2014 9 e101996 10.1371/journal.pone.0101996 25010934 PMC4092121 · DOI
  67. [69]Goethals K. Vereecke D. Jaziri M. Van M.M. Holsters M. Leafy gall formation by Rhodococcus fascians Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2001 39 27 52 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.27 11701858 · DOI
  68. [71]Stamler R.A. Kilcrease J. Kallsen C. Fichtner E.J. Cooke P. Heerema R.J. Randall J.J. First report of Rhodococcus isolates causing Pistachio Bushy Top Syndrome on ‘UCB-1’ rootstock in California and Arizona Plant Dis. 2015 99 1468 1476 10.1094/PDIS-12-14-1340-RE 30695969 · DOI
  69. [72]Vereecke D. Zhang Y. Francis I.M. Lambert P.Q. Venneman J. Stamler R.A. Kilcrease J. Randall J.J. Functional genomics insights into the pathogenicity, habitat fitness, and mechanisms modifying plant development of Rhodococcus sp. PBTS1 and PBTS2 Front. Microbiol. 2020 11 14 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00014 32082278 PMC7002392 · DOI
  70. [73]Vereecke D. Fichtner E.J. Lambert P.Q. Cooke P. Kilcrease J. Stamler R.A. Zhang Y. Francis I.M. Randall J.J. Colonization and survival capacities underlying the multifaceted life of Rhodococcus sp. PBTS1 and PBTS2 Plant Pathol. 2021 70 567 583 10.1111/ppa.13307 · DOI
  71. [74]Park J.M. Koo J. Kang S.W. Jo S.H. Park J.M. Detection of Rhodococcus fascians, the causative agent of lily fasciation in South Korea Pathogens 2021 10 241 10.3390/pathogens10020241 33672562 PMC7924060 · DOI
  72. [75]Vereecke D. Cornelis K. Temmerman W. Jaziri M. Van Montagu M. Holsters M. Goerhals K. Chromosomal locus that affects the pathogenicity of Rhodococcus fascians J. Bacteriol. 2002 184 1112 1120 10.1128/jb.184.4.1112-1120.2002 11807072 PMC134788 · DOI
  73. [76]Savory E.A. Fuller S.L. Weisberg A.J. Thomas W.J. Gordon M.I. Stevens D.M. Creason A.L. Belcher M.S. Serdani M. Wiseman M.S. Evolutionary transitions between beneficial and phytopathogenic Rhodococcus challenge disease management eLife 2017 6 e30925 10.7554/eLife.30925 29231813 PMC5726852 · DOI
  74. [77]von Bargen K. Haas A. Molecular and infection biology of the horse pathogen Rhodococcus equi FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009 33 870 891 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00181.x 19453748 · DOI
  75. [78]Bell K.S. Philp J.C. Aw D.W. Christofi N. The genus Rhodococcus J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998 85 195 210 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00525.x 9750292 · DOI
  76. [79]Vázquez-Boland J.A. Wim G. Meijer W.G. The pathogenic actinobacterium Rhodococcus equi: What’s in a name? Mol. Microbiol. 2019 112 1 15 10.1111/mmi.14267 31099908 PMC6852188 · DOI
  77. [80]Takai S. Sawada N. Nakayama Y. Ishizuka S. Nakagawa R. Kawashima G. Sangkanjanavanich N. Sasaki Y. Kakuda T. Suzuk Y. Reinvestigation of the virulence of Rhodococcus equi isolates from patients with and without AIDS Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2020 71 679 683 10.1111/lam.13386 32920889 · DOI
  78. [81]Scotton P.G. Tonon E. Giobbia M. Gallucci M. Rigoli R. Vaglia A. Rhodococcus equi nosocomial meningitis cured by levofloxacin and shunt removal Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000 30 223 224 10.1086/313628 10619769 · DOI
  79. [82]Matsushita H. Hanayama N. Hobo K. Kuba K. Takazawa A. Infectious endocarditis caused by Rhodococcus equi Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010 89 957 959 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.053 20172165 · DOI
  80. [83]Kedlaya I. Ing M.B. Wong S.S. Rhodococcus equi infections in immunocompetent hosts: Case report and review Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001 32 39 46 10.1086/318520 11170969 · DOI
  81. [84]Gurtler V. Mayall B.C. Seviour R. Can whole genome analysis refine the taxonomy of the genus Rhodococcus? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004 28 377 403 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.001 15449609 · DOI
  82. [85]Muscatello G. Leadon D.P. Klay M. Ocampo-Sosa A. Lewis D.A. Fogarty U. Buckley T. Gilkerson J.R. Meijer W.G. Vazquez-Boland J.A. Rhodococcus equi infection in foals: The science of ‘rattles’ Equine Vet. J. 2007 39 470 478 10.2746/042516407X209217 17910275 · DOI
  83. [86]Vázquez-Boland J.A. Prescott J.F. Meijer W.G. Leadon D.P. Hines S.A. Havermeyer workshop report: Rhodococcus equi comes of age Equine Vet. J. 2009 41 93 95 10.2746/042516409X383564 19301589 · DOI
  84. [87]MacArthur I. Anastasi E. Alvarez S. Scortti M. Vázquez-Boland J.A. Comparative genomics of Rhodococcus equi virulence plasmids indicates host-driven evolution of the vap pathogenicity island GBE 2017 9 1241 1247 10.1093/gbe/evx057 28369330 PMC5434932 · DOI
  85. [88]Sangal V. Goodfellow M. Jones A.L. Seviour R.J. Sutcliffe I.C. Refined systematics of the genus Rhodococcus based on whole genome analyses Biology of Rhodococcus. Microbiology Monographs 2nd ed. Alvarez H.M. Springer Nature Cham, Switzerland 2019 Volume 16 1 21
  86. [89]Álvarez-Narváez S. Huber L. Giguère S. Hart K.A. Berghaus R.D. Sanchez S. Cohen N.D. Epidemiology and molecular basis of multidrug resistance in Rhodococcus equi Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2021 85 e00011 e00021 10.1128/MMBR.00011-21 33853933 PMC8139527 · DOI
  87. [90]Willingham-Lane J.M. Coulson G.B. Hondalus M.K. Identification of a VapA virulence factor functional homolog in Rhodococcus equi isolates housing the pVAPB plasmid PLoS ONE 2018 13 e0204475 10.1371/journal.pone.0204475 30286098 PMC6171844 · DOI
  88. [91]Heller M.C. Jackson K.A. Watson J.L. Identification of immunologically relevant genes in mare and foal dendritic cells responding to infection by Rhodococcus equi Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010 136 144 150 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.02.016 20334935 · DOI
  89. [92]Mourenza Á. Bravo-Santano N. Pradal I. Gil J.A. Mateos L.M. Letek M. Mycoredoxins are required for redox homeostasis and intracellular survival in the actinobacterial pathogen Rhodococcus equi Antioxidants 2019 8 558 10.3390/antiox8110558 PMC6912445 31731720 · DOI
  90. [93]von Bargen K. Scraba M. Krämer I. Ketterer M. Nehls C. Krokowski S. Repnik U. Wittlich M. Maaser A. Zapka P. Virulence-associated protein A from Rhodococcus equi is an intercompartmental pH-neutralising virulence factor Cell. Microbiol. 2019 21 e12958 10.1111/cmi.12958 30251327 · DOI
  91. [94]Valero-Rello A. Hapeshi A. Anastasi E. Alvarez S. Scortti M. Meijer W.G. MacArthur I. Vázquez-Boland J.A. An invertron-like linear plasmid mediates intracellular survival and virulence in bovine isolates of Rhodococcus equi Infect. Immun. 2015 83 2725 2737 10.1128/IAI.00376-15 25895973 PMC4468562 · DOI
  92. [95]Paterson M.L. Ranasinghe D. Blom J. Dover L.G. Sutcliffe I.C. Lopes B. Sangal V. Genomic analysis of a novel Rhodococcus (Prescottella) equi isolate from a bovine host Arch. Microbiol. 2019 201 1317 1321 10.1007/s00203-019-01695-z 31302711 PMC6790187 · DOI
  93. [96]Ying J. Ye J. Xu T. Wang Q. Bao Q. Li A. Comparative genomic analysis of Rhodococcus equi: An insight into genomic diversity and genome evolution Int. J. Genom. 2019 2019 8987436 10.1155/2019/8987436 PMC6948317 31950028 · DOI
  94. [97]Álvarez-Narváez S. Giguère S. Berghaus L.J. Dailey C. Vazquez-Boland J.A. Horizontal spread of Rhodococcus equi macrolide resistance plasmid pRErm46 across environmental actinobacteria Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020 86 e00108-20 10.1128/AEM.00108-20 32169935 PMC7170479 · DOI
  95. [98]Baba H. Nada T. Ohkusu K. Ezaki T. Hasagawa Y. Paterson D.L. First case of bloodstream infection caused by Rhodococcus erythropolis J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009 47 2667 2669 10.1128/JCM.00294-09 19494072 PMC2725670 · DOI
  96. [99]Khairy H. Meinert C. Wubbeler J.H. Poehlein A. Daniel R. Voigt B. Riedel K. Steinbüchel A. Genome and proteome analysis of Rhodococcus erythropolis MI2: Elucidation of the 4,4′-dithiodibutyric acid catabolism PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0167539 10.1371/journal.pone.0167539 27977722 PMC5157978 · DOI
  97. [100]Sazykin I. Makarenko M. Khmelevtsova L. Seliverstova E. Rakin A. Sazykina M. Cyclohexane, naphthalene, and diesel fuel increase oxidative stress, CYP153, sodA, and recA gene expression in Rhodococcus erythropolis Microbiologyopen 2019 8 e00855 31119875 PMC6816061
  98. [101]Zheng Y.T. Toyofuku M. Nomura N. Shigeto S. Correlation of carotenoid accumulation with aggregation and biofilm development in Rhodococcus sp. SD-74 Anal. Chem. 2013 85 7295 7301 10.1021/ac401188f 23802134 · DOI
  99. [102]Weathers T.S. Higgins C.P. Sharp J.O. Enhanced biofilm production by a toluene-degrading Rhodococcus observed after exposure to perfluoroalkyl acids Envir. Sci. Technol. 2015 49 5458 5466 10.1021/es5060034 25806435 · DOI
  100. [103]Kuyukina M.S. Ivshina I.B. Production of trehalolipid biosurfactants by Rhodococcus Biology of Rhodococcus. Microbiology Monographs 2nd ed. Alvarez H.M. Springer Nature Cham, Switzerland 2019 Volume 16 271 298
  101. [104]Franzetti A. Gandolfi I. Bestetti G. Smyth T.J.P. Banat I.M. Production and applications of trehalose lipid biosurfactants Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2010 112 617 627 10.1002/ejlt.200900162 · DOI
  102. [105]Pacwa-Płociniczak M. Płaza G.A. Piotrowska-Seget Z. Cameotra S.S. Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing Pseudomonas sp. P-1 strain as a potential tool for bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011 12 633 654 10.3390/ijms12010633 24743958 PMC4125813 · DOI
  103. [106]Kuyukina M.S. Ivshina I.B. Korshunova I.O. Rubtsova E.V. Assessment of bacterial resistance to organic solvents using a combined confocal laser scanning and atomic force microscopy (CLSM/AFM) J. Microbiol. Methods. 2014 107 23 29 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.08.020 25193441 · DOI
  104. [107]Serebrennikova M.K. Kuyukina M.S. Krivoruchko A.V. Ivshina I.B. Adaptation of coimmobilized Rhodococcus cells to oil hydrocarbons in a column bioreactor Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2014 50 265 272 10.1134/S0003683814030144 25757338 · DOI
  105. [108]Korshunova I.O. Pistsova O.N. Kuyukina M.S. Ivshina I.B. The effect of organic solvents on the viability and morphofunctional properties of Rhodococcus Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2016 52 43 50 10.1134/S0003683816010075 · DOI
  106. [109]Tarasova E.V. Grishko V.V. Ivshina I.B. Cell adaptations of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 66 to betulin biotransformation Proc. Biochem. 2017 52 1 9 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.10.003 · DOI
  107. [110]Cheremnykh K.M. Luchnikova N.A. Grishko V.V. Ivshina I.B. Bioconversion of ecotoxic dehydroabietic acid using Rhodococcus actinobacteria J. Hazard. Mater. 2018 346 103 112 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.12.025 29253749 · DOI
  108. [111]Bos R. van der Mei H.C. Busscher H.J. Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions—Its mechanisms and methods for study FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1999 23 179 230 10.1016/S0168-6445(99)00004-2 10234844 · DOI · Paper page
  109. [112]Matz C. Kjelleberg S. Off the hook—How bacteria survive protozoan grazing Trends Microbiol. 2005 13 909 915 10.1016/j.tim.2005.05.009 15935676 · DOI
  110. [113]Lekfeldt J.D.S. Rønn R. A common soil fagellate (Cercomonas sp.) grows slowly when feeding on the bacterium Rhodococcus fascians in isolation, but does not discriminate against it in a mixed culture with Sphingopyxis witfariensis FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008 65 113 124 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00486.x 18462400 · DOI
  111. [114]Corno G. Villiger J. Pernthaler J. Coaggregation in a microbial predator–prey system affects competition and trophic transfer efficiency Ecology. 2013 94 870 881 10.1890/12-1652.1 · DOI · Paper page
  112. [115]Rubtsova E.V. Kuyukina M.S. Ivshina I.B. Effect of cultivation conditions on the adhesive activity of rhodococci towards n-hexadecane Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2012 48 452 459 10.1134/S0003683812050110 23101387 · DOI
  113. [116]Denich T.J. Beaudette L.A. Lee H. Trevors J.T. Effect of selected environmental and physico-chemical factors on bacterial cytoplasmic membranes J. Microbiol. Methods. 2003 52 149 182 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00155-0 12459238 · DOI
  114. [118]de Carvalho C.C.C.R. Fischer M.A. Kirsten S. Wurz B. Wick L.Y. Heipieper H.J. Adaptive response of Rhodococcus opacus PWD4 to salt and phenolic stress on the level of mycolic acids AMB Express 2016 6 66 10.1186/s13568-016-0241-9 27620730 PMC5016484 · DOI
  115. [119]Henson W.R. Hsu F.F. Dantas G. Moon T.S. Foston M. Lipid metabolism of 1480 phenol-tolerant Rhodococcus opacus strains for lignin bioconversion Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018 11 339 10.1186/s13068-018-1337-z 30607174 PMC6309088 · DOI
  116. [120]Su X. Guo L. Ding L. Qu K. Shen C. Induction of viable but nonculturable state in Rhodococcus and transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0147593 10.1371/journal.pone.0147593 26808070 PMC4725852 · DOI
  117. [121]Alvarez H. Steinbüchel A. Biology of triacylglycerol accumulation by Rhodococcus Biology of Rhodococcus. Microbiology Monographs 2nd ed. Alvarez H.M. Springer Nature Cham, Switzerland 2019 Volume 16 299 332
  118. [122]Kuyukina M.S. Ivshina I.B. Rychkova M.I. Chumakov O.B. Effect of cell lipid composition on the formation of nonspecific antibiotic resistance in alkanotrophic rhodococci Microbiology 2000 69 51 57 10.1007/BF02757257 10808491 · DOI
  119. [123]Sokolovská I. Rozenberg R. Riez C. Rouxhet P.G. Agathos S.N. Wattiau P. Carbon source-induced modifications in the mycolic acid content and cell wall permeability of Rhodococcus erythropolis El Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003 69 7019 7027 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7019-7027.2003 14660344 PMC309960 · DOI
  120. [124]Barbey C. Chane A. Burini J.F. Maillot O. Merieau A. Gallique M. Beury-Cirou A. Konto-Ghiorghi Y. Feuilloley M. Gobert V. A rhodococcal transcriptional regulatory mechanism detects the common lactone ring of AHL quorum-sensing signals and triggers the quorum-quenching response Front. Microbiol. 2018 9 2800 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02800 30524404 PMC6262395 · DOI
  121. [125]Müller C. Birmes F.S. Rückert C. Kalinowski J. Fetzner S. Rhodococcus erythropolis BG43 genes mediating Pseudomonas aeruginosa quinolone signal degradation and virulence factor attenuation Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015 81 7720 7729 10.1128/AEM.02145-15 26319870 PMC4616948 · DOI
  122. [126]Iwabuchi N. Sunairi M. Anzai H. Morisaki H. Nakajima M. Relationships among colony morphotypes, cell-surface properties and bacterial adhesion to substrata in Rhodococcus Colloid. Surface. B 2003 30 51 60 10.1016/S0927-7765(03)00036-5 · DOI
  123. [127]Iwabuchi N. Sharma P.K. Sunairi M. Kishi E. Sugita K. van der Mei H.C. Nakajima M. Busscher H.J. Role of interfacial tensions in the translocation of Rhodococcus erythropolis during growth in a two phase culture Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009 43 8290 8294 10.1021/es901208s 19924958 · DOI
  124. [128]Laczi K. Kis Á. Horváth B. Maróti G. Hegedüs B. Perei K. Rákhely G. Metabolic responses of Rhodococcus erythropolis PR4 grown on diesel oil and various hydrocarbons Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015 99 9745 9759 10.1007/s00253-015-6936-z 26346267 · DOI
  125. [129]Pen Y. Zhang Z.J. Morales-García A.L. Mears M. Tarmey D.S. Edyvean R.G. Banwart S.A. Geoghegan M. Effect of extracellular polymeric substances on the mechanical properties of Rhodococcus Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015 1848 518 526 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.007 25462171 · DOI
  126. [131]Marris D.P. Hagr A. Biofilm: Why the sudden interest? J. Otolaryngol. 2005 34 56 59 16076417
  127. [132]Ivshina I.B. Kuyukina M.S. Philp J.C. Christofi N. Oil desorption from mineral and organic materials using biosurfactant complexes produced by Rhodococcus species World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998 14 711 717 10.1023/A:1008885309221 · DOI
  128. [133]Kuyukina M.S. Ivshina I.B. Makarov S.O. Litvinenko L.V. Cunningham C.J. Philp J.C. Effect of biosurfactants on crude oil desorption and mobilization in a soil system Environ. Intern. 2005 31 155 161 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.009 15661276 · DOI
  129. [134]Ivshina I. Kostina L. Krivoruchko A. Kuyukina M. Peshkur T. Anderson P. Cunningham C. Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil spiked with model mixtures of petroleum hydrocarbons and heterocycles using biosurfactants from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 J. Hazard. Mater. 2016 312 8 17 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.007 27015374 · DOI
  130. [135]Ward O. Singh A. van Hamme J. Accelerated biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon waste J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003 30 260 270 10.1007/s10295-003-0042-4 12687495 · DOI
  131. [136]Alvarez H.M. Relationship between β-oxidation and the hydrocarbon-degrading profile and actinomycetes bacteria Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 2003 52 35 42 10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00120-8 · DOI
  132. [137]Ramos J.L. Duque E. Gallegos M.-T. Godoy P. Ramos-González M.I. Rojas A. Terán W. Segura A. Mechanisms of solvent tolerance in gram-negative bacteria Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2002 56 743 768 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.161038 12142492 · DOI
  133. [138]Belfiore C. Curia M.V. Farías M.E. Characterization of Rhodococcus sp. A5wh isolated from a high altitude Andean lake to unravel the survival strategy under lithium stress Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2018 50 311 322 29239754
  134. [139]Allocati N. Masulli M. Di Ilio C. de Laurenzi V. Die for the community: An overview of programmed cell death in bacteria Cell Death Dis. 2015 6 e1609 10.1038/cddis.2014.570 25611384 PMC4669768 · DOI
  135. [140]Atrat P. Hösel P. Richter W. Meyer H.W. Hörhold C. Interactions of Mycobacterium fortuitum with solid sterol substrate particles J. Basic Microbiol. 1991 31 413 422 10.1002/jobm.3620310605 · DOI
  136. [141]Neumann G. Veeranagouda Y. Karegoudar T.B. Sahin O. Mäusezahl I. Kabelitz N. Kappelmeyer U. Heipieper H.J. Cells of Pseudomonas putida and Enterobacter sp. adapt to toxic organic compounds by increasing their size Extremophiles 2005 9 163 168 10.1007/s00792-005-0431-x 15765202 · DOI
  137. [142]Nithya C. Gnanalakshmi B. Pandian S.K. Assessment and characterization of heavy metal resistance in Palk Bay sediment bacteria Mar. Environ. Res. 2011 71 283 294 10.1016/j.marenvres.2011.02.003 21377723 · DOI
  138. [143]Veeranagouda Y. Karegoudar T.B. Neumann G. Heipieper H.J. Enterobacter sp. VKGH12 growing with n-butanol as the sole carbon source and cells to which the alcohol is added as pure toxin show considerable differences in their adaptive responses FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006 254 48 54 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00017.x 16451178 · DOI
  139. [144]Shen Y. Zhao S. Zhao X. Sun H. Shao M. Xu H. In vitro adsorption mechanism of acrylamide by lactic acid bacteria LWT 2019 100 119 125 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.10.058 · DOI
  140. [145]Du L.N. Wang B. Li G. Wang S. Crowley D.E. Zhao Y.H. Biosorption of the metal-complex dye Acid Black 172 by live and heat-treated biomass of Pseudomonas sp. strain DY1: Kinetics and sorption mechanisms J. Hazard. Mater. 2012 205–206 47 54 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.001 22236947 · DOI
  141. [146]Uzoechi S.C. Abu-Lail N.I. The effects of β-lactam antibiotics on surface modifications of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli: A multiscale approach Microsc. Microanal. 2019 25 135 150 10.1017/S1431927618015696 30869575 PMC6599534 · DOI
  142. [147]Jia Y. Yu C. Fan J. Fu Y. Ye Z. Guo X. Xu Y. Shen C. Alterations in the cell wall of Rhodococcus biphenylivorans under norfloxacin stress Front. Microbiol. 2020 11 554957 10.3389/fmicb.2020.554957 33123102 PMC7573542 · DOI
  143. [148]Halder S. Yadav K.K. Sarkar R. Mukherjee S. Saha P. Haldar S. Karmakar S. Sen T. Alteration of Zeta potential and membrane permeability in bacteria: A study with cationic agents SpringerPlus 2015 4 672 10.1186/s40064-015-1476-7 26558175 PMC4633473 · DOI
  144. [149]Wilson W.W. Wade M.M. Holman S.C. Champlin F.R. Status of methods for assessing bacterial cell surface charge J. Microbiol. Methods 2001 43 153 164 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00224-4 11118650 · DOI
  145. [150]Gibson K.J.C. Gilleron M. Constant P. Puzo G. Nigou J. Besra G.S. Structural and functional features of Rhodococcus ruber lipoarabinomannan Microbiology 2003 149 1437 1445 10.1099/mic.0.26161-0 12777484 · DOI
  146. [151]Kaczorek E. Pacholak A. Zdarta A. Smułek W. The impact of biosurfactants on microbial cell properties leading to hydrocarbon bioavailability increase Colloids Interfaces 2018 2 35 10.3390/colloids2030035 · DOI
  147. [152]Arakha M. Saleem M. Mallick B.C. Jha S. The effects of interfacial potential on antimicrobial propensity of ZnO nanoparticle Sci. Rep. 2015 5 9578 10.1038/srep09578 25873247 PMC4397836 · DOI
  148. [153]Strahl H. Hamoen L.W. Membrane potential is important for bacterial cell division Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010 107 12281 12286 10.1073/pnas.1005485107 20566861 PMC2901462 · DOI
  149. [154]Bai N. Wang S. Abuduaini R. Zhang M. Zhu X. Zhao Y. Rhamnolipid-aided biodegradation of carbendazim by Rhodococcus sp. D-1: Characteristics, products, and phytotoxicity Sci. Total Environ. 2017 590–591 343 351 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.025 28279530 · DOI
  150. [155]Kalakoutskii L.V. In the flow of time Proceedings of the IV International Conference “Microbial Diversity: Resource Potential” Moscow, Russia 23–25 November 2016 Ivshina I.B. Kuyukina M.S. Kamenskikh T.N. Alfimova L.A. Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch, Perm State University, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Perm, Russia 2016 121 122

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivshina, I. B., Kuyukina, M. S., Krivoruchko, A. V., & Tyumina, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Perm Federal Research Center UB RAS, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms UB RAS, 13 Golev Str., 614081 Perm, Russia
  • Perm State University (RU)
ORCID
Venue
Pathogens
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-08-02
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
974
ISSN
2076-0817 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/pathogens10080974
PMC
PMC8398200
OpenAlex
W3191290869
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Pathogens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (AAAA-A19-119112290008-4, ААА-А19-119112290010-7)
  • Russian Science Foundation (18-14-00140, 21-14-00132)
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research (20-44-596001)
  • Perm Krai Government (C-26/174.1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
Rhodococcus, saprophytes, anthropogenic pollution, actinobacteria, hydrocarbon degradation, resting cells, cell wall, surface adhesion, facultative parasitism, opportunistic pathogens, environmental adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review