The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilm Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in Humans: Clinical Implications and Management
Open accessAbstract
Since its initial description in the 1960s, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has developed multiple mechanisms for antimicrobial resistance and evading the immune system, including biofilm production. MRSA is now a widespread pathogen, causing a spectrum of infections ranging from superficial skin issues to severe conditions like osteoarticular infections and endocarditis, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Biofilm production is a key aspect of MRSA’s ability to invade, spread, and resist antimicrobial treatments. Environmental factors, such as suboptimal antibiotics, pH, temperature, and tissue oxygen levels, enhance biofilm formation. Biofilms are intricate bacterial structures with dense organisms embedded in polysaccharides, promoting their resilience. The process involves stages of attachment, expansion, maturation, and eventually disassembly or dispersion. MRSA’s biofilm formation has a complex molecular foundation, involving genes like icaADBC, fnbA, fnbB, clfA, clfB, atl, agr, sarA, sarZ, sigB, sarX, psm, icaR, and srtA. Recognizing pivotal genes for biofilm formation has led to potential therapeutic strategies targeting elemental and enzymatic properties to combat MRSA biofilms. This review provides a practical approach for healthcare practitioners, addressing biofilm pathogenesis, disease spectrum, and management guidelines, including advances in treatment. Effective management involves appropriate antimicrobial therapy, surgical interventions, foreign body removal, and robust infection control practices to curtail spread within healthcare environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baddour, L. M., Wilson, W. R., Bayer, A. S., Fowler, V. G., Tleyjeh, I. M., Rybak, M. J., Barsic, B., Lockhart, P. B., Gewitz, M. H., Levison, M. E., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000296 · Cited by 3,232
Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era
Chambers, H. F., & DeLeo, F. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2200 · Cited by 2,718
Ikuta, K. S., Swetschinski, L. R., Robles Aguilar, G., Sharara, F., Mestrovic, T., Gray, A. P., Davis Weaver, N., Wool, E. E., Han, C., Gershberg Hayoon, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02185-7 · Cited by 2,235
Self-citationStrategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections
Wu, H., Moser, C., Wang, H.-Z., Høiby, N., & Song, Z.-J. (2015) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/ijos.2014.65 · Cited by 925
Current and Emerging Methods of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Khan, Z. A., Siddiqui, M. F., & Park, S. (2019) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics9020049 · Cited by 442
A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism
Peng, Q., Tang, X., Dong, W., Sun, N., & Yuan, W. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12010012 · Cited by 440
Jang, H., Kim, S., Kim, K. H., Kim, C. J., Lee, S., Song, K., Jeon, J. H., Park, W. B., Kim, H. B., Park, S., et al. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/600295 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms
Touaitia, R., Mairi, A., Ibrahim, N. A., Basher, N. S., Idres, T., & Touati, A. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14050470 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaushik, A., Kest, H., Sood, M., Steussy, B., Thieman, C., & Gupta, S.
- Venue
- Pathogens
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-01-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76
- ISSN
- 2076-0817 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390877635
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 63.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.