Cited by 5Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisPolyomavirus and related diseases

The Age-Related Efficacy of Dimethyl Fumarate and Natalizumab in the Real-World Management of Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
De Masi, Roberto, Orlando, Stefania, De Donno, Antonella·2021·Pharmaceuticals

Abstract

We investigated the comparative age-related efficacy of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and natalizumab (NTZ) in clinical practice on multiple sclerosis (MS). Research in this area is lacking in the previous literature. In a three-year retrospective and clinical–paraclinical study, we compared 173 DMF patients and 94 NTZ patients with a similar average age (40 years) and disease duration (DD) (10 years). Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were higher in the NTZ group than in the DMF group at 3.5 vs. 2.5, respectively (p = 0.001). However, in both groups, age values correlated with DD (r = 0.42; p < 0.001), EDSS (r = 0.52; p < 0.001) and age at onset (r = 0.18; p < 0.001). Furthermore, age-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves showed that NTZ-treated subjects maintained a 1.0–3.0 EDSS status score (p = 0.003) more frequently and a 3.5–7.0 score (p = 0.022) significantly less frequently compared with DMF-treated subjects. The EDSS percentage mean difference between NTZ and DMF groups was 81.6%, decreasing inversely with age (r = −0.34; p < 0.001). Finally, high EDSS score values were reached at the age of 39–40 years, regardless of their experimental group. We demonstrated age as a major contributor in disability and response to therapy in current management of MS. Thus, age should be considered in the risk/benefit evaluation in decision making for the disease modifying treatments in MS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ph14020081

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference in GANAB expression between healthy controls and RRMS patients is attributed to immunosenescence.

    “This different expression between HCs and RRMS has been attributed to the well-known phenomenon of immunosenescence already described in MS [449,450].”

    From GANAB and N-Glycans Substrates Are Relevant in Human Physiology, Polycystic Pathology and Multiple Sclerosis: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [450]

    The Introduction discusses immunosenescence in MS in relation to immune-cell proliferation and treatment response, not GANAB expression. Searches for GANAB and for expression differences between healthy controls and RRMS patients found no passage addressing that comparison or attributing it to immunosenescence. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]Scalfari A. Neuhaus A. Daumer M. Ebers G.C. Muraro P.A. Age and disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis Neurology 2011 77 1246 1252 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318230a17d 21917763 PMC3179646 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Trojano M. Liguori M. Zimatore G.B. Bugarini R. Avolio C. Paolicelli D. Giuliani F. De Robertis F. Marrosu M.G. Livrea P. Age-related disability in multiple sclerosis Ann. Neurol. 2002 51 475 480 10.1002/ana.10147 11921053 · DOI
  3. [3]Confavreux C. Vukusic S. Age at disability milestones in multiple sclerosis Brain 2006 129 595 605 10.1093/brain/awh714 16415309 · DOI
  4. [4]Fülöp T. Larbi A. Dupuis G. Le Page A. Frost E.H. Cohen A.A. Witkowski J.M. Franceschi C. Immunosenescence and Inflamm-Aging As Two Sides of the Same Coin: Friends or Foes? Front. Immunol. 2018 8 1960 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01960 29375577 PMC5767595 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Buffa S. Bulati M. Pellicanò M. Dunn-Walters D.K. Wu Y.-C.B. Candore G. Vitello S. Caruso C. Colonna-Romano G. B cell immunosenescence: Different features of naive and memory B cells in elderly Biogerontology 2011 12 473 483 10.1007/s10522-011-9353-4 21879287 · DOI
  6. [6]Grebenciucova E. Berger J.R. Immunosenescence: The role of aging in the predisposition to neuro-infectious complications arising from the treatment of multiple sclerosis Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2017 17 61 10.1007/s11910-017-0771-9 28669032 · DOI
  7. [7]Pinti M. Appay V. Campisi J. Frasca D. Fülöp T. Sauce D. Larbi A. Weinberger B. Cossarizza A. Aging of the immune system: Focus on inflammation and vaccination Eur. J. Immunol. 2016 46 2286 2301 10.1002/eji.201546178 27595500 PMC5156481 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Kraft G.H. Freal J.E. Coryell J.K. Disability, disease duration, and rehabilitation service needs in multiple sclerosis: Patient perspectives Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1986 67 164 168 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90060-2 3954578 · DOI
  9. [9]Coyle P.K. Switching Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis CNS Drugs 2013 27 239 247 10.1007/s40263-013-0042-5 23508518 · DOI
  10. [10]Lassmann H. Van Horssen J. Mahad D. Progressive multiple sclerosis: Pathology and pathogenesis Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012 8 647 656 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.168 23007702 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [11]Komori M. Blake A. Greenwood M. Lin Y.C. Kosa P. Ghazali D. Winokur P. Natrajan M. Wuest S.C. Romm E. CSF markers reveal intrathecal inflammation in progressive multiple sclerosis Ann. Neurol. 2015 78 3 20 10.1002/ana.24408 25808056 PMC5568079 · DOI
  12. [12]Wuest S.C. Mexhitaj I. Chai N.R. Romm E. Scheffel J. Xu B. Lane K. Wu T. Bielekova B. A Complex Role of Herpes Viruses in the Disease Process of Multiple Sclerosis PLoS ONE 2014 9 e105434 10.1371/journal.pone.0105434 25148387 PMC4141762 · DOI
  13. [13]Baker D. Pryce G. Amor S. Giovannoni G. Schmierer K. Learning from other autoimmunities to understand targeting of B cells to control multiple sclerosis Brain 2018 141 2834 2847 10.1093/brain/awy239 30212896 · DOI
  14. [14]Wu G.F. Alvarez E. The immunopathophysiology of multiple sclerosis Neurol. Clin. 2011 29 257 278 10.1016/j.ncl.2010.12.009 21439440 PMC3080042 · DOI
  15. [15]Magliozzi R. Howell O. Vora A. Serafini B. Nicholas R. Puopolo M. Reynolds R. Aloisi F. Meningeal B-cell follicles in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis associate with early onset of disease and severe cortical pathology Brain 2006 130 1089 1104 10.1093/brain/awm038 17438020 · DOI
  16. [16]Magliozzi R. Howell O.W. Reeves C. Roncaroli F. Nicholas R. Serafini B. Aloisi F. Reynolds R. A Gradient of neuronal loss and meningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis Ann. Neurol. 2010 68 477 493 10.1002/ana.22230 20976767 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [18]Weideman A.M. Tapia-Maltos M.A. Johnson K. Greenwood M. Bielekova B. Meta-analysis of the Age-Dependent Efficacy of Multiple Sclerosis Treatments Front. Neurol. 2017 8 577 10.3389/fneur.2017.00577 29176956 PMC5686062 · DOI
  18. [22]Weinshenker B.G. The Natural History of Multiple Sclerosis Neurol. Clin. 1995 13 119 146 10.1016/S0733-8619(18)30064-1 7739500 · DOI
  19. [23]Leray E. Yaouanq J. Le Page E. Coustans M. Laplaud D. Oger J. Edan G. Evidence for a two-stage disability progression in multiple sclerosis Brain 2010 133 1900 1913 10.1093/brain/awq076 20423930 PMC2892936 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Masi, R., Orlando, S., & De Donno, A.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Neuroproteomics, Multiple Sclerosis Centre, “F. Ferrari” Hospital, 73042 Casarano, Lecce, Italy
  • Laboratory of Hygiene, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of the Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Corresponding author
Orlando, Stefania
Venue
Pharmaceuticals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-01-22
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
81
ISSN
1424-8247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125475058
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmaceuticals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, dimethyl fumarate, natalizumab, age differences in treatment response, Expanded Disability Status Scale, disability progression, disease-modifying therapy, age of onset, disease duration, risk-benefit assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review