GlicoPro, Novel Standardized and Sterile Snail Mucus Extract for Multi-Modulative Ocular Formulations: New Perspective in Dry Eye Disease Management
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the mucoadhesive and regenerative properties of a novel lubricating multimolecular ophthalmic solution (GlicoPro®) extracted from snail mucus and its potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic role in the management of dry eye disease (DED). GlicoPro bio-adhesive efficacy was assessed using a lectin-based assay, and its regenerative properties were studied in a human corneal epithelial cell line. In vitro DED was induced in human corneal tissues; the histology and mRNA expression of selected genes of inflammatory and corneal damage biomarkers were analyzed in DED tissues treated with GlicoPro. A higher percentage of bio-adhesivity was observed in corneal cells treated with GlicoPro than with sodium hyaluronate-based compounds. In the scratch test GlicoPro improved in vitro corneal wound healing. Histo-morphological analysis revealed restoration of cellular organization of the corneal epithelium, microvilli, and mucin network in DED corneal tissues treated with GlicoPro. A significant reduction in inflammatory and ocular damage biomarkers was observed. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis identified an endogenous opioid, opiorphin, in the peptide fraction of GlicoPro. In conclusion, GlicoPro induced regeneration and bio-adhesivity in corneal cells; moreover, considering its anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, this novel ophthalmic lubricating solution may be an innovative approach for the management of DED.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different authors provide somewhat or even quite different criteria of acceptability for standardization of snail mucus from H. aspersa.
“Concerning the standardization of snail mucus from H. aspersa, it is worth paying attention to the fact that different authors [27,28,29,33,37] provide somewhat or even quite different criteria of acceptability (Table 1).”
From Chemical Variability and Biological Potential of Cornu aspersum Mucus as a Source for the Development of New Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical Products (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
The Results (section 3.1; page unavailable) say that specific analyses allowed standardization of this paper’s H. aspersa mucus extract, GlicoPro, and the Methods (section 2.2) describe what was measured. The paper therefore supplies one approach to characterization, but the passages do not give acceptability criteria or compare them with those of other authors. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- [1]Stapleton F. Alves M. Bunya V.Y. Jalbert I. Lekhanont K. Malet F. Na K.-S. Schaumberg D. Uchino M. Vehof J. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report Ocul. Surf. 2017 15 334 365 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 28736337 · DOI
- [2]Craig J.P. Nichols K.K. Akpek E.K. Caffery B. Dua H.S. Joo C.-K. Liu Z. Nelson J.D. Nichols J.J. Tsubota K. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report Ocul. Surf. 2017 15 276 283 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008 28736335 · DOI
- [3]Gomes J.P. Santo R.M. The impact of dry eye disease treatment on patient satisfaction and quality of life: A review Ocul. Surf. 2019 17 9 19 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.11.003 30419303 · DOI
- [4]Bron A.J. de Paiva C. Chauhan S.K. Bonini S. Gabison E.E. Jain S. Knop E. Markoulli M. Ogawa Y. Perez V. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report Ocul. Surf. 2017 15 438 510 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011 28736340 · DOI
- [5]Nair A.P. D’Souza S. Shetty R. Ahuja P. Kundu G. Khamar P. Dadachanji Z. Paritekar P. Patel P. Dickman M.M. Altered ocular surface immune cell profile in patients with dry eye disease Ocul. Surf. 2021 21 96 106 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.04.002 33862224 · DOI
- [6]Meloni M. De Servi B. Marasco D. Del Prete S. Molecular mechanism of ocular surface damage: Application to an in vitro dry eye model on human corneal epithelium Mol. Vis. 2011 17 113 126 21245952 PMC3021568
- [7]Barabino S. Montaldo E. Solignani F. Valente C. Mingari M.C. Rolando M. Immune response in the conjunctival ep-ithelium of patients with dry eye Exp. Eye Res. 2010 91 524 529 10.1016/j.exer.2010.07.008 20654615 · DOI
- [8]Nicolle P. Liang H. Reboussin E. Rabut G. Warcoin E. Brignole-Baudouin F. Melik-Parsadaniantz S. Baudouin C. Labbe A. Goazigo A.R.-L. Proinflammatory Markers, Chemokines, and Enkephalin in Patients Suffering from Dry Eye Disease Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 19 1221 10.3390/ijms19041221 PMC5979502 29673232 · DOI
- [9]Shamloo K. Mistry P. Barbarino A. Ross C. Jhanji V. Sharma A. Differential Effect of Proinflammatory Cytokines on Corneal and Conjunctival Epithelial Cell Mucins and Glycocalyx Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2021 10 17 10.1167/tvst.10.7.17 34128966 PMC8212448 · DOI
- [11]Ozdogan M.S. Gungormus M. Yusufoglu S.I. Ertem S.Y. Sonmez C. Orhan M. Salivary opiorphin in dental pain: A potential biomarker for dental disease Arch. Oral Biol. 2019 99 15 21 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.12.006 30590229 · DOI
- [12]Ozdogan S. Sonmez C. Yolcu D. Gungormus M. Tear Opiorphin Levels in Ocular Pain Caused by Corneal Foreign Body Cornea 2020 39 1377 1380 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002383 32482963 · DOI
- [13]Sabeti S. Kheirkhah A. Yin J. Dana R. Management of meibomian gland dysfunction: A review Surv. Ophthalmol. 2020 65 205 217 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.08.007 31494111 · DOI
- [14]Mittal R. Patel S. Galor A. Alternative therapies for dry eye disease Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2021 32 348 361 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000768 34010229 PMC8169641 · DOI
- [15]Barabino S. Benitez-Del-Castillo J.M. Fuchsluger T. Labetoulle M. Malachkova N. Meloni M. Utheim T.P. Rolando M. Dry eye disease treatment: The role of tear substitutes, their future, and an updated classification Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020 24 8642 8652 32964952
- [16]Trapella C. Rizzo R. Gallo S. Alogna A. Bortolotti D. Casciano F. Zauli G. Secchiero P. Voltan R. HelixComplex snail mucus exhibits pro-survival, proliferative and pro-migration effects on mammalian fibroblasts Sci. Rep. 2018 8 17665 10.1038/s41598-018-35816-3 30518946 PMC6281574 · DOI · Paper page
- [17]Gentili V. Bortolotti D. Benedusi M. Alogna A. Fantinati A. Guiotto A. Turrin G. Cervellati C. Trapella C. Rizzo R. HelixComplex snail mucus as a potential technology against O3 induced skin damage PLoS ONE 2020 15 e0229613 10.1371/journal.pone.0229613 32084249 PMC7034816 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]Safavi-Hemami H. Brogan S.E. Olivera B.M. Pain therapeutics from cone snail venoms: From Ziconotide to novel non-opioid pathways J. Proteom. 2019 190 12 20 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.05.009 PMC6214764 29777871 · DOI
- [19]Chotikavanich S. de Paiva C.S. de Li Q. Chen J.J. Bian F. Farley W.J. Pflugfelder S.C. Production and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 on the ocular surface increase in dysfunctional tear syndrome Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009 50 3203 3209 10.1167/iovs.08-2476 19255163 PMC3594995 · DOI
- [20]Lam H. Bleiden L. de Paiva C. Farley W. Stern M.E. Pflugfelder S.C. Tear Cytokine Profiles in Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009 147 198 205.e1 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.032 18992869 PMC3582020 · DOI
- [21]Yoon K.-C. Jeong I.-Y. Park Y.-G. Yang S.-Y. Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Levels in Tears of Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome Cornea 2007 26 431 437 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31803dcda2 17457192 · DOI
- [22]Mantelli F. Argüeso P. Functions of ocular surface mucins in health and disease Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008 8 477 483 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32830e6b04 18769205 PMC2666617 · DOI
- [23]Gipson I.K. Distribution of mucins at the ocular surface Exp. Eye Res. 2004 78 379 388 10.1016/S0014-4835(03)00204-5 15106916 · DOI
- [24]Narayanan S. Miller W.L. McDermott A.M. Expression of human beta-defensins in conjunctival epithelium: Relevance to dry eye disease Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003 44 3795 3801 10.1167/iovs.02-1301 12939294 PMC1497873 · DOI
- [25]McDermott A.M. The Role of Antimicrobial Peptides at the Ocular Surface Ophthalmic Res. 2008 41 60 75 10.1159/000187622 19122467 PMC3712804 · DOI
- [28]El Mubarak M.A. Lamari F.N. Kontoyannis C. Simultaneous determination of allantoin and glycolic acid in snail mucus and cosmetic creams with high performance liquid chromatography and ultraviolet detection J. Chromatogr. A 2013 1322 49 53 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.10.086 24239039 · DOI · Paper page
- [30]Lin H. Qu Y. Geng Z. Li C. Wu H. Dong N. Liu Z. Li W. Air Exposure Induced Characteristics of Dry Eye in Conjunctival Tissue Culture PLoS ONE 2014 9 e87368 10.1371/journal.pone.0087368 24498087 PMC3909183 · DOI
- [31]Rizzo S. Savastano M.C. Bortolotti D. Savastano A. Gambini G. Caccuri F. Gentili V. Rizzo R. COVID-19 Ocular Prophylaxis: The Potential Role of Ozonated-Oils in Lipo-some Eyedrop Gel Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2021 10 7 10.1167/tvst.10.9.7 PMC8354035 34351367 · DOI
- [32]Ali S. Davinelli S. Mencucci R. Fusi F. Scuderi G. Costagliola C. Scapagnini G. Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid with Liposomes and Crocin Confers Cytoprotection in an Experimental Model of Dry Eye Molecules 2021 26 849 10.3390/molecules26040849 33561944 PMC7915152 · DOI
- [33]Wu X. Chen X. Ma Y. Lin X. Yu X. He S. Luo C. Xu W. Analysis of tear inflammatory molecules and clinical correlations in evaporative dry eye disease caused by meibomian gland dysfunction Int. Ophthalmol. 2020 40 3049 3058 10.1007/s10792-020-01489-z 32601963 PMC7550292 · DOI
- [34]Moshirfar M. Benstead E.E. Sorrentino P.M. Tripathy K. Ocular Neuropathic Pain StatPearls [Internet] StatPearls Publishing Treasure Island, FL, USA 2021 31194422
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hudz, N., Turkina, V., Alyokhina, T., Motyka, O., Chemerys, N., Rumynska, T., Lozynskyi, A., Jasicka-Misiak, I., & Kobylinska, L. (2025) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules30214197 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mencucci, R., Strazzabosco, G., Cristofori, V., Alogna, A., Bortolotti, D., Gafà, R., Cennamo, M., Favuzza, E., Trapella, C., Gentili, V., & Rizzo, R.
- Affiliations
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
- University of Ferrara (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mencucci, Rita
- Rizzo, Roberta
- ORCID
- Venue
- Pharmaceutics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-12-13
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2139
- ISSN
- 1999-4923 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8708832
- OpenAlex
- W4200592319
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- FB Vision (NA)
- HelixPharma srl (NA)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Keywords
- dry eye, corneal epithelial wound healing, bioadhesion, anti-inflammatory activity, opiorphin, corneal regeneration, corneal epithelium, ophthalmic preparations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review