Cited by 12Spaceflight effects on biologyEffects of Radiation ExposureRadiation Dose and Imaging

Dose Limits and Countermeasures for Mitigating Radiation Risk in Moon and Mars Exploration

Open access
Boscolo, Daria, Durante, Marco·2022·Physics

Abstract

After decades of research on low-Earth orbit, national space agencies and private entrepreneurs are investing in exploration of the Solar system. The main health risk for human space exploration is late toxicity caused by exposure to cosmic rays. On Earth, the exposure of radiation workers is regulated by dose limits and mitigated by shielding and reducing exposure times. For space travel, different international space agencies adopt different limits, recently modified as reviewed in this paper. Shielding and reduced transit time are currently the only practical solutions to maintain acceptable risks in deep space missions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/physics4010013

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on these dose rates, the current estimates for a full Mars mission are critically high, exceeding most space agency limits that are set at 0.6-1 Sv.

    “Based on these dose rates, which are mainly delivered by GCR and can be further increased by potential SPEs, the current estimates for a full Mars mission are critically high, exceeding most space agency limits that are set at 0.6–1 Sv38.”

    From Towards sustainable human space exploration—priorities for radiation research to quantify and mitigate radiation risks (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    Section 3 (ICRP; page not provided) says a Mars mission would approach 1 Sv and that essentially no NASA astronauts could join under the limits discussed, while ESA and RSA astronauts would be close to their maximum dose. Sections 2.2–2.3 give the RSA and ESA limits as 1 Sv. The source therefore supports the dose concern and the approximate 0.6–1 Sv limits, but not the claim that a full Mars mission would exceed most agencies’ limits; it also cautions that no agency had established limits for missions beyond low Earth orbit. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Giraudo, M.; Schuy, C.; Weber, U.; Rovituso, M.; Santin, G.; Norbury, J.W.; Tracino, E.; Menicucci, A.; Bocchini, L.; Lobascio, C.; et al. Accelerator-based tests of shielding effectiveness of different materials and multilayers using high-energy light and heavy ions. Radiat. Res. 2018, 190, 526-537. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  2. Walsh, L.; Schneider, U.; Fogtman, A.; Kausch, C.; McKenna-Lawlor, S.; Narici, L.; Ngo-Anh, J.; Reitz, G.; Sabatier, L.; Santin, G.; et al. Research plans in Europe for radiation health hazard assessment in exploratory space missions. Life Sci. Space Res. 2019, 21, 73-82. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Mullenders, L.; Atkinson, M.; Paretzke, H.; Sabatier, L.; Bouffler, S. Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 596-604. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  4. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 2007, 37, 1-332. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/annals-of-the-icrp/vol/37/issue/2 (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  5. Rühm, W.; Woloschak, G.E.; Shore, R.E.; Azizova, T.V.; Grosche, B.; Niwa, O.; Akiba, S.; Ono, T.; Suzuki, K.; Iwasaki, T.; et al. Dose and dose-rate effects of ionizing radiation: A discussion in the light of radiological protection. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2015, 54, 379-401. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Reynolds, R.; Little, M.P.; Day, S.; Charvat, J.; Blattnig, S.; Huff, J.; Patel, Z.S. Cancer incidence and mortality in the USA Astronaut Corps, 1959-2017. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021, 78, 869-875. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  7. Durante, M.; Kronenberg, A. Ground-based research with heavy ions for space radiation protection. Adv. Space Res. 2005, 35, 180-184. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Ozasa, K.; Shimizu, Y.; Suyama, A.; Kasagi, F.; Soda, M.; Grant, E.J. Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 14, 1950-2003: An overview of cancer and noncancer diseases. Radiat. Res. 2012, 243, 229-243. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Grant, E.J.; Brenner, A.; Sugiyama, H.; Sakata, R.; Sadakane, A.; Utada, M.; Cahoon, E.K.; Milder, C.M.; Soda, M.; Cullings, H.M.; et al. Solid cancer incidence among the life span study of atomic bomb survivors: 1958-2009. Radiat. Res. 2017, 187, 513-537. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  10. Shuchman, M. Striving for Mars: What are acceptable risks? CMAJ 2014, 186, E7-E8. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Kahn, J.; Liverman, C.T.; Mccoy, M.A. Health Standards for Long Duration and Exploration Spaceflight; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222144/ (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  12. Luoni, F.; Horst, F.; Reidel, C.A.; Quarz, A.; Bagnale, L.; Sihver, L.; Weber, U.; Norman, R.B.; de Wet, W.; Giraudo, M.; et al. Total nuclear reaction cross-section database for radiation protection in space and heavy-ion therapy applications. New J. Phys. 2021, 23, 101201. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Tinganelli, W.; Luoni, F.; Durante, M. What can space radiation protection learn from radiation oncology? Life Sci. Space Res. 2021, 30, 82-95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  14. McKenna-Lawlor, S.; Bhardwaj, A.; Ferrari, F.; Kuznetsov, N.; Lal, A.K.; Li, Y.; Nagamatsu, A.; Nymmik, R.; Panasyuk, M.; Petrov, V.; et al. Feasibility study of astronaut standardized career dose limits in LEO and the outlook for BLEO. Acta Astronaut. 2014, 104, 565-573. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Petrov, V.M.; Kovalev, E.E.; Sakovich, V.A. Radiation: Risk and protection in manned space flight. Acta Astronaut. 1981, 8, 1091-1097. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Petrov, V.M. Radiation risk during long-term spaceflight. Adv. Space Res. 2002, 30, 989-994. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Menzel, H.-G.; Harrison, J. Effective dose: A radiation protection quantity. Ann. ICRP 2012, 41, 117-123. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. ICRP. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 1991, 21, 1-201. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/annals-of-the-icrp/vol/21/issue/1 (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  19. Cucinotta, F.A.; Durante, M. Cancer risk from exposure to galactic cosmic rays: Implications for space exploration by human beings. Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7, 431-435. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.; Apostolakis, J.; Araujo, H.; Arce, P.; Asai, M.; Axen, D.; Banerjee, S.; Barrand, G.; et al. Geant4-A simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003, 506, 250-303. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Krämer, M.; Durante, M. Ion beam transport calculations and treatment plans in particle therapy. Eur. Phys. J. D 2010, 60, 195-202. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Friedrich, T.; Scholz, U.; Elsässer, T.; Durante, M.; Scholz, M. Calculation of the biological effects of ion beams based on the microscopic spatial damage distribution pattern. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2012, 88, 103-107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  23. Chauvie, S.; Francis, Z.; Guatelli, S.; Incerti, S.; Mascialino, B.; Moretto, P.; Nieminen, P.; Pia, M.G. Geant4 physics processes for microdosimetry simulation: Design foundation and implementation of the first set of models. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2007, 54, 2619-2628. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Schneider, U.; Walsh, L. Risk of secondary cancers: Bridging epidemiology and modeling. Phys. Med. 2017, 42, 228-231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  25. Walsh, L.; Hafner, L.; Straube, U.; Ulanowski, A.; Fogtman, A.; Durante, M.; Weerts, G.; Schneider, U. A bespoke health risk assessment methodology for the radiation protection of astronauts. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2021, 60, 213-231. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ulanowski, A.; Kaiser, J.C.; Schneider, U.; Walsh, L. Lifetime radiation risk of stochastic effects-Prospective evaluation for space flight or medicine. Ann. ICRP 2020, 49, 200-212. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Komiyama, T. Practicalities of dose management for Japanese astronauts staying at the International Space Station. Ann. ICRP 2020, 49, 194-199. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Devleesschauwer, B.; Havelaar, A.H.; Maertens de Noordhout, C.; Haagsma, J.A.; Praet, N.; Dorny, P.; Duchateau, L.; Torgerson, P.R.; Van Oyen, H.; Speybroeck, N. Calculating disability-adjusted life years to quantify burden of disease. Int. J. Public Health 2014, 59, 565-569. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Shimada, K.; Kai, M. Calculating disability-adjusted life years (DALY) as a measure of excess cancer risk following radiation exposure. J. Radiol. Prot. 2015, 35, 763-775. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  30. Breckow, J. Do we really need the "detriment" for radiation protection? Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2020, 59, 343-348. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  31. Durante, M.; Cucinotta, F.A. Cosmic Rays: Hurdles on the Road to Mars. Nucl. Phys. News 2014, 24, 32-34. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Little, M.P.; Azizova, T.V.; Hamada, N. Low-and moderate-dose non-cancer effects of ionizing radiation in directly exposed individuals, especially circulatory and ocular diseases: A review of the epidemiology. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2021, 97, 782-803. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Spillantini, P.; Casolino, M.; Durante, M.; Mueller-Mellin, R.; Reitz, G.; Rossi, L.; Shurshakov, V.; Sorbi, M. Shielding from cosmic radiation for interplanetary missions: Active and passive methods. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 14-23. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  34. Dobynde, M.I.; Shprits, Y.Y.; Drozdov, A.Y.; Hoffman, J.; Li, J. Beating 1 Sievert: Optimal radiation shielding of astronauts on a mission to Mars. Space Weather. 2021, 19, e2021SW002749. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Miller, J.; Zeitlin, C.; Cucinotta, F.A.; Heilbronn, L.; Stephens, D.; Wilson, J.W. Benchmark studies of the effectiveness of structural and internal materials as radiation shielding for the international space station. Radiat. Res. 2003, 159, 381-390. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Schuy, C.; La Tessa, C.; Horst, F.; Rovituso, M.; Durante, M.; Giraudo, M.; Bocchini, L.; Baricco, M.; Castellero, A.; Fioreh, G.; et al. Experimental assessment of Lithium hydride's space radiation shielding performance and Monte Carlo benchmarking. Radiat. Res. 2018, 191, 154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  37. Zeitlin, C.; Guetersloh, S.; Heilbronn, L.; Miller, J.; Elkhayari, N.; Empl, A.; LeBourgeois, M.; Mayes, B.W.; Pinsky, L.; Christl, M.; et al. Shielding experiments with high-energy heavy ions for spaceflight applications. New J. Phys. 2008, 10, 075007. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Viúdez-Moreiras, D. The ultraviolet radiation environment and shielding in pit craters and cave skylights on Mars. Icarus 2021, 370, 114658. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Czysz, P.A.; Bruno, C.; Chudoba, B. Future Spacecraft Propulsion Systems and Integration; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Ger- many, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. National Academy of Sciences. Space Nuclear Propulsion for Human Mars Exploration; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Durante, M.; Bruno, C. Impact of rocket propulsion technology on the radiation risk in missions to Mars. Eur. Phys. J. D 2010, 60, 215-218. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Ebrahimi, F. An Alfvenic reconnecting plasmoid thruster. J. Plasma Phys. 2020, 86, 905860614. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Mazouffre, S. Electric propulsion for satellites and spacecraft: Established technologies and novel approaches. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2016, 25, 033002. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Rafalskyi, D.; Martínez, J.M.; Habl, L.; Zorzoli Rossi, E.; Proynov, P.; Boré, A.; Baret, T.; Poyet, A.; Lafleur, T.; Dudin, S.; et al. In-orbit demonstration of an iodine electric propulsion system. Nature 2021, 599, 411-415. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boscolo, D., & Durante, M.
Affiliations
GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Durante, Marco
Venue
Physics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-09
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
172-184
ISSN
2624-8174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210995189
Cited by
12
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Technischen Universität Darmstadt (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GSI Repository (German Federal Government) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion)
  • Technischen Universität Darmstadt (cc-by)
Funders
European Space Agency (ERFNet)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
Keywords
radiation dose limits, cosmic rays, late radiation effects, human space exploration, lunar exploration, Mars exploration, radiation shielding, transit time reduction, radiation countermeasures, deep space missions, radiation protection regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review