Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential of Essential Oils from Anise, Dill and Fennel Seeds for the Gypsy Moth Control

Kostić, Igor, Lazarević, Jelica, Šešlija Jovanović, Darka, Kostić, Miroslav, Marković, Tatjana, Milanović, Slobodan·2021·Plants
DOI 10.3390/plants10102194PMC PMC8538750
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Erebidae)) is a serious pest of hardwood forests. In the search for an environmentally safe means of its control, we assessed the impact of different concentrations of essential oils (EOs) from the seeds of three Apiaceae plants (anise Pimpinella anisum, dill Anethum graveolens, and fennel Foeniculum vulgare) on behavior, mortality, molting and nutritional physiology of gypsy moth larvae (GML). EOs efficacy was compared with commercial insecticide NeemAzal®-T/S (neem). The main compounds in the Eos were trans-anethole in anise; carvone, limonene, and α-phellandrene in dill; and trans-anethole and fenchone in fennel seed. At 1% EOs concentration, anise and fennel were better antifeedants and all three EOs were more toxic than neem. Neem was superior in delaying 2nd to 3rd larval molting. In the 4th instar, 0.5%, anise and fennel EOs decreased relative consumption rate more than neem, whereas all three EOs were more effective in reducing growth rate, approximate digestibility and efficiency of conversion of food into body mass leading to higher metabolic costs to GML. Decrease in consumption and metabolic parameters compared to control GML confirmed that adverse effects of the EOs stem from both pre- and post-ingestive mechanisms. The results indicate the potential of three EOs to be used for gypsy moth control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/plants10102194

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Absolute (A), relative (B) and total (C) deterrence coefficient (mean ± SE) in the 2nd instar GML. F-values were obtained from two-way ANOVA testing significance of the main (botanical type−Bot and concentration−Conc) and interaction (Bot × Conc) effects on analyzed traits (** p ˂ 0.01, *** p ˂ 0.001). Different colored letters mark significant differences among EOs and neem within each concentration (capital letters A, B, C), and among concentrations within each EO and neem (small letters a, b, c) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05).
Figure 1 Absolute (A), relative (B) and total (C) deterrence coefficient (mean ± SE) in the 2nd instar GML. F-values were obtained from two-way ANOVA testing significance of the main (botanical type−Bot and concentration−Conc) and interaction (Bot × Conc) effects on analyzed traits (** p ˂ 0.01, *** p ˂ 0.001). Different colored letters mark significant differences among EOs and neem within each concentration (capital letters A, B, C), and among concentrations within each EO and neem (small letters a, b, c) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Digestive toxicity in the 2nd instar GML (A) and the 2nd to 3rd molting reduction (B) (mean ± SE) after 120 h (24 h exposure to EOs or neem supplemented diet followed by 96 h feeding on untreated diet). GML were exposed to different EOs and neem concentrations. F-values were obtained from two-way ANOVA testing significance of the main (botanical type—Bot and concentration—Conc) and interaction (Bot × Conc) effects on analyzed traits (*** p ˂ 0.001). Different colored letters mark significant differences among EOs and neem within each concentration (capital letters A, B, C), and among concentrations within each EO and neem (small letters a, b, c, d) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05). There was no mortality in GML fed on untreated diet for 120 h.
Figure 2 Digestive toxicity in the 2nd instar GML (A) and the 2nd to 3rd molting reduction (B) (mean ± SE) after 120 h (24 h exposure to EOs or neem supplemented diet followed by 96 h feeding on untreated diet). GML were exposed to different EOs and neem concentrations. F-values were obtained from two-way ANOVA testing significance of the main (botanical type—Bot and concentration—Conc) and interaction (Bot × Conc) effects on analyzed traits (*** p ˂ 0.001). Different colored letters mark significant differences among EOs and neem within each concentration (capital letters A, B, C), and among concentrations within each EO and neem (small letters a, b, c, d) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05). There was no mortality in GML fed on untreated diet for 120 h.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Mass gain (A) and amounts of consumed (B), assimilated (C) and metabolized food (D) (mean ± SE) in the 4th instar GML depending on the botanical type (Bot) (anise, dill and fennel EOs, commercial neem-based insecticide) and concentration (Conc). F−values indicate significance of the effects of Bot, Conc and interaction terms in two-way ANOVA (* p ˂ 0.05, *** p ˂ 0.001). Significant differences among specific experimental groups are presented by different capital colored letters A, B (EO and neem comparisons within each concentration) and small letters a, b (comparisons among concentrations within each EO and neem) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05).
Figure 3 Mass gain (A) and amounts of consumed (B), assimilated (C) and metabolized food (D) (mean ± SE) in the 4th instar GML depending on the botanical type (Bot) (anise, dill and fennel EOs, commercial neem-based insecticide) and concentration (Conc). F−values indicate significance of the effects of Bot, Conc and interaction terms in two-way ANOVA (* p ˂ 0.05, *** p ˂ 0.001). Significant differences among specific experimental groups are presented by different capital colored letters A, B (EO and neem comparisons within each concentration) and small letters a, b (comparisons among concentrations within each EO and neem) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Nutritional indices (mean ± SE) in 4th instar gypsy moth larvae after 48 h of feeding on control and diet treated with EOs or neem. RGR−relative growth rate (A); RCR−relative consumption rate (B); RMR−relative metabolic rate (C); ECI−efficiency of conversion of ingested food (D); AD−approximate digestibility (E); ECD−efficiency of conversion of digested food (F); MC−metabolic cost (G). F−values obtained by nonparametric two-way ANOVA indicate significance of the main and interaction effects of botanical type (Bot) (anise, dill, and fennel EOs and commercial neem-based insecticide) and concentration (Conc) (* p ˂ 0.05, ** p ˂ 0.01, *** p ˂ 0.001). Significant differences among specific experimental groups are presented by different large colored letters A, B (EO and neem comparisons within each concentration) and small letters a, b (comparisons among concentrations within each EO and neem) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05).
Figure 4 Nutritional indices (mean ± SE) in 4th instar gypsy moth larvae after 48 h of feeding on control and diet treated with EOs or neem. RGR−relative growth rate (A); RCR−relative consumption rate (B); RMR−relative metabolic rate (C); ECI−efficiency of conversion of ingested food (D); AD−approximate digestibility (E); ECD−efficiency of conversion of digested food (F); MC−metabolic cost (G). F−values obtained by nonparametric two-way ANOVA indicate significance of the main and interaction effects of botanical type (Bot) (anise, dill, and fennel EOs and commercial neem-based insecticide) and concentration (Conc) (* p ˂ 0.05, ** p ˂ 0.01, *** p ˂ 0.001). Significant differences among specific experimental groups are presented by different large colored letters A, B (EO and neem comparisons within each concentration) and small letters a, b (comparisons among concentrations within each EO and neem) (LSM contrasts, p ˂ 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 141

  1. Liebhold, A.M., Gottschalk, K.W., Muzika, R.M., Montgomery, M.E., Young, R., O’Day, K., and Kelley, B. (1995). Suitability of North American Tree Species to the Gypsy Moth: A Summary of Field and Laboratory Tests, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service NE Forest Experimental Station General Technical Bulletin NE-211. · DOI
  2. Vuleta, 2014, Preference and performance of the larvae of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) on three species of European oaks, Eur. J. Entomol., 111, 371, 10.14411/eje.2014.039 · DOI
  3. Naidoo, 2001, Effects of gypsy moth on radial growth of deciduous trees, For. Sci., 47, 338
  4. Fajvan, 2008, The effects of thinning and gypsy moth defoliation on wood volume growth in oaks, Trees, 22, 257, 10.1007/s00468-007-0183-6 · DOI
  5. Davidson, 1999, Tree mortality following defoliation by the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) in the United States: A review, For. Sci., 45, 74
  6. Jankovsky, 2014, Effects of pedunculate oak tree vitality on gypsy moth preference and performance, Arch. Biol. Sci., 66, 1659, 10.2298/ABS1404659M · DOI
  7. Morin, 2016, Invasive forest defoliator contributes to the impending downward trend of oak dominance in eastern North America, Forestry, 89, 284, 10.1093/forestry/cpv053 · DOI
  8. Arai, 2010, Damage of Lymantria dispar and Lymantria mathura aurora in apple orchards, Annu. Rep. Soc. Plant Prot. North Jpn., 61, 220
  9. Bigsby, 2014, The cost of gypsy moth sex in the city, Urban For. Urban Green., 13, 459, 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.05.003 · DOI
  10. Stenersen, J. (2004). Chemical Pesticides Mode of Action and Toxicology, CRC Press. [1st ed.]. · DOI
  11. Devine, 2007, Insecticide use: Contexts and ecological consequences, Agric. Hum. Values, 24, 281, 10.1007/s10460-007-9067-z · DOI
  12. Guedes, 2017, Sublethal exposure, insecticide resistance, and community stress, Curr. Opin. Insect Sci., 21, 47, 10.1016/j.cois.2017.04.010 · DOI
  13. Brevik, 2018, Pesticide durability and the evolution of resistance: A novel application of survival analysis, Pest Manag. Sci., 74, 1953, 10.1002/ps.4899 · DOI
  14. Umina, 2019, Escalating insecticide resistance in Australian grain pests: Contributing factors, industry trends and management opportunities, Pest Manag. Sci., 75, 1494, 10.1002/ps.5285 · DOI
  15. Singh, P., Kumar, A., and Borthakur, A. (2020). Pollution status and biodegradation of organophosphate pesticides in the environment. Abatement of Environmental Pollutants, Elsevier.
  16. Thangavel, P., and Sridevi, G. (2015). A review of bio pesticides and their mode of action against insect pests. Environmental Sustainability—Role of Green Technologies, Springer. · DOI
  17. Kumar, 2015, A review on efficacy of biopesticides to control the agricultural insect’s pest, Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res., 4, 168
  18. Anwer, M.A. (2017). Biopesticides and Bioagents: Novel Tools for Pest Management, CRC Press. [1st ed.]. · DOI
  19. Isman, 2020, Commercial development of plant essential oils and their constituents as active ingredients in bioinsecticides, Phytochem. Rev., 19, 235, 10.1007/s11101-019-09653-9 · DOI
  20. Kontogiannatos, D. (2020). Practical approaches to pest control: The use of natural compounds. Pests, Weeds and Diseases in Agricultural Crop and Animal Husbandry Production, IntechOpen. · DOI
  21. Shahzad, 2021, Nanoformulations and their mode of action in insects: A review of biological interactions, Drug Chem. Toxicol., 44, 1, 10.1080/01480545.2018.1525393 · DOI
  22. Liebhold, 1999, The evolving use of insecticides in gypsy moth management, J. For., 97, 20
  23. Sharov, 2002, “Slow the spread”: A national program to contain the gypsy moth, Forestry, 100, 30
  24. Helson, 1992, Naturally derived insecticides: Prospects for forestry use, For. Chron., 68, 349, 10.5558/tfc68349-3 · DOI
  25. Builders, P.H. (2019). Plants secondary metabolites: The key drivers of the pharmacological actions of medicinal plants. Herbal Medicine, IntechOpen. · DOI
  26. Khare, 2020, Plant secondary metabolites synthesis and their regulations under biotic and abiotic constraints, J. Plant Biol., 63, 203, 10.1007/s12374-020-09245-7 · DOI
  27. Pavela, 2016, History, presence and perspective of using plant extracts as commercial botanical insecticides and farm products for protection against insects—A review, Plant Protect. Sci., 52, 229, 10.17221/31/2016-PPS · DOI
  28. Rai, 2006, Pesticides based on plant essential oils: From traditional practice to commercialization, Advances in Phytomedicine, Volume 3, 29, 10.1016/S1572-557X(06)03002-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tripathi, 2009, A review on prospects of essential oils as biopesticide in insect-pest management, J. Pharmacogn. Phytother., 1, 052
  30. Nerio, 2010, Repellent activity of essential oils: A review, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 372, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.048 · DOI
  31. Stoytcheva, M. (2011). Botanical insecticides and their effects on insect biochemistry and immunity. Pesticides in the Modern World—Pests Control and Pesticides Exposure and Toxicity Assessment, IntechOpen. · DOI
  32. Nollet, L.M.L., and Rathore, H.S. (2017). Commercialization of insecticides based on plant essential oils: Past, present, and future. Green Pesticides Handbook, CRC Press. · DOI
  33. Coutinho, 2019, Adulticide and repellent activity of essential oils against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)–A review, S. Afr. J. Bot., 124, 160, 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.05.007 · DOI
  34. Isman, 2020, Botanical insecticides in the twenty-first century—Fulfilling their promise?, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 65, 233, 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025010 · DOI
  35. Benelli, G. (2020). On a magical mystery tour of green insecticide research: Current issues and challenges. Molecules, 25. · DOI
  36. Spinozzi, 2021, Apiaceae essential oils and their constituents as insecticides against mosquitoes—A review, Ind. Crops Prod., 171, 113892, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113892 · DOI
  37. Bruce, 2011, Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects–finding the right mix, Phytochemistry, 72, 1605, 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.04.011 · DOI
  38. Deletre, 2016, Prospects for repellent in pest control: Current developments and future challenges, Chemoecology, 26, 127, 10.1007/s00049-016-0214-0 · DOI
  39. Wallau, 2015, Eugenia uniflora leaves essential oil induces toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster: Involvement of oxidative stress mechanisms, Toxicol. Res., 4, 634, 10.1039/C4TX00162A · DOI
  40. Shahriari, 2017, Effect of Teucrium polium (Lamiaceae) essential oil on digestive enzyme activities and energy reserves of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Invertebr. Surviv. J., 14, 182
  41. Benelli, 2018, Not just popular spices! Essential oils from Cuminum cyminum and Pimpinella anisum are toxic to insect pests and vectors without affecting non-target invertebrates, Ind. Crops Prod., 124, 236, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.048 · DOI
  42. Hashem, 2018, Pimpinella anisum essential oil nanoemulsions against Tribolium castaneum—Insecticidal activity and mode of action, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 18802, 10.1007/s11356-018-2068-1 · DOI
  43. Hashem, A.S., Ramadan, M.M., Abdel-Hady, A.A., Sut, S., Maggi, F., and Dall’Acqua, S. (2020). Pimpinella anisum essential oil nanoemulsion toxicity against Tribolium castaneum? Shedding light on its interactions with aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase by molecular docking. Molecules, 25. · DOI
  44. Otero, 2019, Mitochondrial affectation, DNA damage and AChE inhibition induced by Salvia officinalis essential oil on Aedes aegypti larvae, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol., 221, 29, 10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.03.006 · DOI
  45. Fergani, 2020, Genotoxicity of some plant essential oils in cotton leafworm, Spodopteralittoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): The potential role of detoxification enzymes, Egypt. J. Zool., 73, 53, 10.21608/ejz.2020.28358.1029 · DOI
  46. 2020, Desperate times call for desperate measures: Short-term use of the common ash tree by gypsy moth larvae (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) under density and starvation stress, Arch. Biol. Sci., 72, 63, 10.2298/ABS191106067M · DOI
  47. Chen, 2021, Detoxification, antioxidant, and digestive enzyme activities and gene expression analysis of Lymantria dispar larvae under carvacrol, J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 24, 208, 10.1016/j.aspen.2020.12.014 · DOI
  48. Nasr, 2021, Nutritional responses of the black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon (Hufn.), larvae under toxicity effects of five wild botanical extracts from Sinai, Egypt, Annu. Res. Rev. Biol., 36, 30, 10.9734/arrb/2021/v36i330351 · DOI
  49. Haddi, 2020, Rethinking biorational insecticides for pest management: Unintended effects and consequences, Pest Manag. Sci., 76, 2286, 10.1002/ps.5837 · DOI
  50. Larramendy, M.L., and Soloneski, S. (2012). Essential oils of Umbelliferae (Apiaceae) family taxa as emerging potent agents for mosquito control. Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control—Currentand Future Tactics, IntechOpen. Chapter 26.
  51. Yeom, 2012, Insecticidal and acetylcholine esterase inhibition activity of Apiaceae plant essential oils and their constituents against adults of German cockroach (Blattella germanica), J. Agric. Food Chem., 60, 7194, 10.1021/jf302009w · DOI
  52. Ebadollahi, 2013, Plant essential oils from Apiaceae family as alternatives to conventional insecticides, Ecol. Balk., 5, 149
  53. Sousa, 2015, Activities of Apiaceae essential oils and volatile compounds on hatchability, development, reproduction and nutrition of Pseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Ind. Crops Prod., 63, 226, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.052 · DOI
  54. Camilo, 2017, Acaricidal activity of essential oils: A review, Trends Phytochem. Res., 1, 183
  55. Benelli, 2018, Repellence of essential oils and selected compounds against ticks—A systematic review, Acta Trop., 179, 47, 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.12.025 · DOI
  56. Chaubey, 2019, Essential oils as green pesticides of stored grain insects, Eur. J. Biol. Res., 9, 202
  57. Ikbal, 2019, Essential oils as active ingredients of botanical insecticides against aphids, J. Pest Sci., 92, 971, 10.1007/s10340-019-01089-6 · DOI
  58. Pavela, 2020, Phenolic monoterpene-rich essential oils from Apiaceae and Lamiaceae species: Insecticidal activity and safety evaluation on non-target earthworms, Entomol. Gen., 40, 421, 10.1127/entomologia/2020/1131 · DOI
  59. Sousa, 2021, The potential of Apiaceae species as sources of singular phytochemicals and plant-based pesticides, Phytochemistry, 187, 112714, 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112714 · DOI
  60. Muturi, 2019, Bioactivity of wild carrot (Daucus carota, Apiaceae) essential oil against mosquito larvae, J. Med. Entomol., 56, 784, 10.1093/jme/tjy226 · DOI
  61. 2013, Biological activity of essential oils of Athamanta haynaldii and Myristica fragrans to gypsy moth larvae, Ind. Crops Prod., 41, 17, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.03.039 · DOI
  62. Pavela, 2016, Essential oils as ecofriendly biopesticides? Challenges and constraints, Trends Plant Sci., 21, 1000, 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Rocha, 2015, Larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti of Foeniculum vulgare essential oils from Portugal and Cape Verde, Nat. Prod. Commun., 10, 677
  64. Pavela, 2016, New knowledge for yield, composition and insecticidal activity of essential oils obtained from the aerial parts or seeds of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.), Ind. Crops Prod., 83, 275, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.090 · DOI
  65. Skuhrovec, 2020, Insecticidal and behavioral effect of microparticles of Pimpinella anisum essential oil on larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), J. Econom. Entomol., 113, 255
  66. Lazarević, J., Jevremović, S., Kostić, I., Kostić, M., Vuleta, A., Manitašević Jovanović, S., and Šešlija Jovanović, D. (2020). Toxic, oviposition deterrent and oxidative stress effects of Thymus vulgaris essential oil against Acanthoscelides obtectus. Insects, 11. · DOI
  67. Moretti, 2002, Essential oil formulations useful as a new tool for insect pest control, AAPS PharmSciTech, 3, 64, 10.1208/pt030213 · DOI
  68. Cetin, 2007, A comparative evaluation of Origanum onites essential oil and its four major components as larvicides against the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams, Pest Manag. Sci., 63, 830, 10.1002/ps.1401 · DOI
  69. Gupta, 2011, Biopesticidal value of selected essential oils against pathogenic fungus, termites, and nematodes, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 65, 703, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.11.018 · DOI
  70. Ezzine, 2018, Larvicidal activity of essential oil of Mentha pulegium on larvae of Orgyia trigotephras Boisduval, 1829 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae), J. New Sci., 20, 3423
  71. Devrnja, 2020, Evaluation of tansy essential oil as a potential “green” alternative for gypsy moth control, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27, 11958, 10.1007/s11356-020-07825-1 · DOI
  72. 2008, Larvicidal and antifeedant activity of some plant-derived compounds to Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Limantriidae), Bioresour. Technol., 99, 7897, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.010 · DOI
  73. 2013, Ecologically acceptable usage of derivatives of essential oil of sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum, as antifeedants against larvae of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, J. Insect Sci., 13, 161
  74. Gvozdenac, 2012, Antifeeding activity of several plant extracts against Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larvae, Pestic. Phytomed., 27, 305, 10.2298/PIF1204305G · DOI
  75. 2009, Susceptibility of eggs of Tribolium confusum, Ephestia kuehniella and Plodia interpunctella to four essential oil vapors, Phytoparasitica, 37, 231, 10.1007/s12600-009-0035-6 · DOI
  76. Karahroodi, 2009, Investigated repellency effect of some essential oils of 17 native medicinal plants on adults Plodia interpunctella, Am.-Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric., 3, 181
  77. Elumalai, 2010, Larvicidal and ovicidal activity of seven essential oil against lepidopteran pest S. litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Int. J. Recent Sci. Res., 1, 8
  78. Sousa, 2013, Activities of Apiaceae essential oils against armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), J. Agric. Food Chem., 61, 7661, 10.1021/jf403096d · DOI
  79. Chantawee, 2018, Larvicidal, pupicidal and oviposition deterrent activities of essential oils from Umbelliferae plants against house fly Musca domestica, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med., 11, 621, 10.4103/1995-7645.246338 · DOI
  80. Pavela, 2011, Screening of Eurasian plants for insecticidal and growth inhibition activity against Spodoptera littoralis larvae, Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6, 2895
  81. Oviedo-Sarmiento, J.S., Cortes, J.J.B., Ávila, W.A.D., Suárez, L.E.C., Daza, E.H., Patiño-Ladino, O.J., and Prieto-Rodríguez, J.A. (2021). Fumigant toxicity and biochemical effects of selected essential oils toward the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 104941. · DOI
  82. Szczepanik, 2005, Feeding deterrent activity of terpenoid lactones with the p-menthane system against the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Environ. Entomol., 34, 1433, 10.1603/0046-225X-34.6.1433 · DOI
  83. Nawrot, 2009, Feeding deterrent activity of terpenoid lactones with a p-menthane system against stored-product pests, J. Stored Prod. Res., 45, 221, 10.1016/j.jspr.2009.03.003 · DOI
  84. Kanda, 2017, A comparative study of monoterpenoids and phenylpropanoids from essential oils against stored grain insects: Acute toxins or feeding deterrents, J. Pest Sci., 90, 531, 10.1007/s10340-016-0800-5 · DOI
  85. Morgan, 2009, Azadirachtin, a scientific gold mine, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 17, 4096, 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.081 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Mello, 2007, Effects of the essential oil obtained from Pilocarpus spicatus Saint-Hilaire (Rutaceae) on the development of Rhodnius prolixus nymphae, Rev. Bras. Farmacogn., 17, 514, 10.1590/S0102-695X2007000400007 · DOI
  87. Oliveira, 2010, Chemical and biological investigations of Pilocarpus spicatus essential oils, Boletín Latinoam. Caribe Plantas Med. Aromáticas, 9, 206
  88. Qin, 2010, Biological activity of the essential oil from the leaves of Piper sarmentosum Roxb. (Piperaceae) and its chemical constituents on Brontispa longissima (Gestro) (Coleoptera: Hispidae), Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 96, 132, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2009.10.006 · DOI
  89. Ghoneim, 2014, Disturbed acid and alkaline phosphatase activities in desert locust Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) by extracts from the khella plant Ammi visnaga L. (Apiaceae), Int. J. Adv. Res., 2, 584
  90. Hummelbrunner, 2001, Acute, sublethal, antifeedant, and synergistic effects of monoterpenoid essential oil compounds on the tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lep., Noctuidae), J. Agric. Food Chem., 49, 715, 10.1021/jf000749t · DOI
  91. Pavela, 2015, Acute toxicity and synergistic and antagonistic effects of the aromatic compounds of some essential oils against Culexquinquefasciatus Say larvae, Parasitol. Res., 114, 3835, 10.1007/s00436-015-4614-9 · DOI
  92. Cruz, 2017, Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of the essential oils of Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Ocimum basilicum L., Eucalyptus staigeriana F. Muell. ex Bailey, Eucalyptus citriodora Hook and Ocimum gratissimum L. and their major components on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants, 20, 1360, 10.1080/0972060X.2017.1383192 · DOI
  93. Zahran, 2011, Insecticidal and developmental inhibitory properties of monoterpenes on Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae), J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 14, 46, 10.1016/j.aspen.2010.11.013 · DOI
  94. Shawir, 2020, Comparative toxicity, growth inhibitory and biochemical effects of terpenes and phenylpropenes on Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.), J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 23, 67, 10.1016/j.aspen.2019.09.005 · DOI
  95. Sohail, 2021, The larvicidal and adulticidal effects of selected plant essential oil constituents on greater wax moths, J. Econom. Entomol., 114, 397, 10.1093/jee/toaa249 · DOI
  96. Hamraoui, 1995, Fumigant toxic activity and reproductive inhibition induced by monoterpenes on Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Coleoptera), a bruchid of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), J. Stored Prod. Res., 31, 291, 10.1016/0022-474X(95)00025-3 · DOI
  97. Ortega, 2014, Antifeedant, feeding deterrent and insect growth regulatory effects of Calceolaria integrifolia sensu lato complex: C. integrifolia x talcana (Scrophulariaceae), Rev. Latinoamer. Quím., 42, 113
  98. Alarcon, 2015, In the search for new secondary metabolites with biopesticidal properties, Isr. J. Plant Sci., 62, 216, 10.1080/07929978.2015.1006424 · DOI
  99. Mann, 2012, Natural product pesticides: Their development, delivery and use against insect vectors, Mini-Rev. Org. Chem., 9, 185, 10.2174/157019312800604733 · DOI
  100. Pavela, 2014, Acute, synergistic and antagonistic effects of some aromatic compounds on the Spodoptera littoralis Boisd. (Lep., Noctuidae) larvae, Ind. Crops Prod., 60, 247, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.030 · DOI
  101. Gaire, S., Scharf, M.E., and Gondhalekar, A.D. (2020). Synergistic toxicity interactions between plant essential oil components against the common bed bug (Cimex lectularius L.). Insects, 11. · DOI
  102. Aungtikun, 2021, Insecticidal synergy of essential oils from Cymbopogon citratus (Stapf.), Myristica fragrans (Houtt.), and Illicium verum Hook. f. and their major active constituents, Ind. Crops Prod., 164, 113386, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113386 · DOI
  103. Kostyukovsky, 2002, Activation of octopaminergic receptors by essential oil constituents isolated from aromatic plants: Possible mode of action against insect pests, Pest Manag. Sci., 58, 1101, 10.1002/ps.548 · DOI
  104. 2010, Mode of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by monoterpenoids and implications for pest control, Ind. Crops Prod., 31, 284, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.11.005 · DOI
  105. Jankowska, M., Rogalska, J., Wyszkowska, J., and Stankiewicz, M. (2018). Molecular targets for components of essential oils in the insect nervous system—A review. Molecules, 23. · DOI
  106. Shahriari, 2018, Effects of α-pinene, trans-anethole, and thymol as the essential oil constituents on antioxidant system and acetylcholine esterase of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 150, 40, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.06.015 · DOI
  107. Bloomquist, 2008, Mode of action of the plant-derived silphinenes on insect and mammalian GABAA receptor/chloride channel complex, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 91, 17, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.12.002 · DOI
  108. Liu, H.-W., and Mander, L. (2010). Terrestrial natural products as antifeedants. Comprehensive Natural Products II, Elsevier.
  109. Santana, 2014, Valorization of essential oils from Moroccan aromatic plants, Nat. Prod. Commun., 9, 1109
  110. 2019, Assessment of toxicity and biochemical response of Tenebrio molitor and Tribolium confusum exposed to Carum carvi essential oil, Entomol. Gen., 38, 333, 10.1127/entomologia/2019/0697 · DOI
  111. Shahriari, 2019, Bio-efficacy and physiological effects of Eucalyptus globulus and Allium sativum essential oils against Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Toxin Rev., 39, 422, 10.1080/15569543.2018.1554588 · DOI
  112. Doskotch, 1980, Antifeedant diterpenes for the gypsy moth larvae from Kalmia latifolia: Isolation and characterization of ten grayanoids, J. Nat. Prod., 43, 617, 10.1021/np50011a016 · DOI
  113. Powell, 1999, Effects of selected Larix laricina terpenoids on Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and behavior, Environ. Entomol., 28, 148, 10.1093/ee/28.2.148 · DOI
  114. Rharrabe, 2008, Effects of azadirachtin on post-embryonic development, energy reserves and α-amylase activity of Plodia interpunctella Hübner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), J. Stored Prod. Res., 44, 290, 10.1016/j.jspr.2008.03.003 · DOI
  115. Khosravi, 2013, Effect of neem pesticide (Achook) on midgut enzymatic activities and selected biochemical compounds in the hemolymph of lesser mulberry pyralid, Glyphodes pyloalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), J. Plant Prot. Res., 53, 238, 10.2478/jppr-2013-0036 · DOI
  116. Maroua, 2017, Azadirachtin induced larval avoidance and antifeeding by disruption of food intake and digestive enzymes in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 143, 135, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.08.006 · DOI
  117. Shu, 2018, Azadirachtin affects the growth of Spodoptera litura Fabricius by inducing apoptosis in larval midgut, Front. Physiol., 9, 137, 10.3389/fphys.2018.00137 · DOI
  118. Kaur, 2019, Bioefficacy of hexane extract of Inula racemosa (Asteraceae) against Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Gesunde Pflanz., 71, 165, 10.1007/s10343-019-00462-w · DOI
  119. Sendi, 2015, Effect of Artemisia annua L. essential oil on toxicity, enzyme activities, and energy reserves of cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), J. Plant Prot. Res., 55, 371, 10.1515/jppr-2015-0049 · DOI
  120. Kiran, 2017, Assessment of toxicity and biochemical mechanisms underlying the insecticidal activity of chemically characterized Boswellia carterii essential oil against insect pest of legume seeds, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 139, 17, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.04.004 · DOI
  121. Campos, 2019, Efficacy of lemongrass essential oil and citral in controlling Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a post-harvest cowpea insect pest, Crop. Protect., 119, 191, 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.02.007 · DOI
  122. Chintalchere, 2021, Impact of essential oils on Musca domestica larvae: Oxidative stress and antioxidant responses, Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., 41, 821, 10.1007/s42690-020-00272-y · DOI
  123. Mikani, 2021, Antifeedant activity of nanoemulsion formulation of arugula Eruca sativa oil on elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 23, 125
  124. Valizadeh, 2013, Effect of Neem based insecticide Achook® on mortality, biological and biochemical parameters of elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola (Col.: Chrysomelidae), J. Crop. Protect., 2, 319
  125. Zhang, 2018, Azadirachtin acting as a hazardous compound to induce multiple detrimental effects in Drosophila melanogaster, J. Hazard. Mater., 359, 338, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.057 · DOI
  126. Shahriari, 2017, Metabolic response of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to essential oil of Ajwain and thymol, Toxin. Rev., 36, 204
  127. Jayakumar, 2021, Toxicity and biochemical effects of essential oils of Anethumgraveolens L. and Melaleuca cajuputi Powell against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), Int. J. Trop. Insect. Sci, 41, 945, 10.1007/s42690-020-00359-6 · DOI
  128. Piri, 2020, Toxicity and physiological effects of ajwain (Carum copticum, Apiaceae) essential oil and its major constituents against Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Chemosphere, 256, 127103, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127103 · DOI
  129. Yu, 1987, Microsomal oxidation of allelochemicals in generalist (Spodoptera frugiperda) and semispecialist (Anticarsiagemmatalis) insect, J. Chem. Ecol., 13, 423, 10.1007/BF01880090 · DOI
  130. Moldenke, 1992, Carbaryl susceptibility and detoxication enzymes in gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): Influence of host plant, J. Econ. Entomol., 85, 1628, 10.1093/jee/85.5.1628 · DOI
  131. Markovic, 1997, Gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) larval development and survival to pupation on diet plus extractables from green ash foliage, Entomol. Exp. Appl., 84, 247, 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00222.x · DOI
  132. Mostafiz, 2020, Acaricidal effects of methyl benzoate against Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) on common crop plants, Pest Manag. Sci., 76, 2347, 10.1002/ps.5770 · DOI
  133. Szczepanik, 2009, The effect of α-methylene lactone group on the feeding deterrent activity of natural and synthetic alkenes against Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 18, 1107
  134. Waldbauer, 1968, The consumption and utilization of food by insects, Adv. Insect Phys., 5, 229, 10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60230-1 · DOI
  135. Scriber, 1981, The nutritional ecology of immature insects, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 26, 183, 10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.001151 · DOI
  136. Farrar, 1989, Quantifying food consumption and growth in insects, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 82, 593, 10.1093/aesa/82.5.593 · DOI
  137. Brunner, 2001, Nonparametric methods in factorial designs, Stat. Pap., 42, 1, 10.1007/s003620000039 · DOI
  138. Lichtenstein, 1974, Insecticidal and synergistic components isolated from dill plants, J. Agric. Food Chem., 22, 658, 10.1021/jf60194a037 · DOI
  139. He, 2011, A review of chemistry and bioactivities of a medicinal spice: Foeniculum vulgare, J. Med. Plants Res., 5, 3595
  140. Pavela, 2018, Essential oils from Foeniculum vulgare Miller as a safe environmental insecticide against the aphid Myzus persicae Sulzer, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 10904, 10.1007/s11356-018-1398-3 · DOI
  141. Kaur, 2021, A review on dill essential oil and its chief compounds as natural biocide, Flavour Fragr. J., 36, 412, 10.1002/ffj.3633 · DOI

Cited by

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Kostić, I., Lazarević, J., Šešlija Jovanović, D., Kostić, M., Marković, T., & Milanović, S.
Venue
Plants
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-15
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
2194
ISSN
2223-7747
DOI
10.3390/plants10102194
PMC
PMC8538750
Cited by
30
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (451-03-9/2021-14/200007)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential of Essential Oils from Anise, Dill and Fennel Seeds for the Gypsy Moth Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/plants10102194
The paper
Kostić, I., Lazarević, J., Šešlija Jovanović, D., Kostić, M., Marković, T., & Milanović, S. (2021). Potential of Essential Oils from Anise, Dill and Fennel Seeds for the Gypsy Moth Control. Plants. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102194

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.