Cited by 31Surfactants and Colloidal SystemsAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly

A comparative study of dynamic light and x-ray scatterings on micelles of topological polymer amphiphiles

Open access
Ree, Brian J., Lee, Jongchan, Satoh, Yusuke, Kwon, Kyungho, Isono, Takuya, Satoh, Toshifumi, Ree, Moonhor·2018·Polymers

Abstract

Micelles were prepared in organic solvents by using three topological polymer amphiphiles: (i) cyclic poly(n-decyl glycidyl ether-block-2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl glycidyl ether) (c-PDGE-b-PTEGGE) and (ii) its linear analogue (l-PDGE-b-PTEGGE); (iii) linear poly(6-phosphorylcholinehexylthiopropyl glycidyl ether-block-n-dodecanoyl glycidyl ether) (l-PPCGE-b-PDDGE). For the individual micelle solutions, the size and distribution were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and synchrotron X-ray scattering analyses. The synchrotron X-ray scattering analysis further found that c-PDGE-b-PTEGGE forms oblate ellipsoidal micelle in an ethanol/water mixture, l-PDGE-b-PTEGGE makes prolate ellipsoidal micelle in an ethanol/water mixture, and l-PPCGE-b-PDDGE forms cylindrical micelle in chloroform. This comparative study found that there are large differences in the size and distribution results extracted by DLS and X-ray scattering analyses. All possible factors to cause such large differences are discussed. Moreover, a better use of the DLS instrument with keeping its merits is proposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/polym10121347

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DLS advantages are non-invasive measurement, minimal sample preparation, and avoidance of pre-experimental calibration.

    “DLS advantages are the non-invasive measurement, the minimal sample preparation, and the avoidance of pre-experimental calibration [133].”

    From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Introduction describes DLS measurement as easy, which broadly supports the claim of convenience. It does not state that DLS is non-invasive, requires minimal sample preparation, or avoids pre-experimental calibration; the Measurements section does not establish those advantages either. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DLS has a narrow resolution, preventing recognition of particles differing from each other by a factor lower than 3 (e.g., 90 and 110 nm are not distinguished and a very high PDI is obtained), negatively impacting the correctness of data from polydisperse samples.

    “In addition to the limitations described above, another weakness of DLS is its narrow resolution, preventing the possibility to recognize particles differing from each other for a factor lower than 3 (e.g.particles of 90 and 110 nm are not distinguished and a very high polydispersity index (PDI) is obtained) negatively impacting on the correctness of data obtained from polydisperse samples”

    From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AFM has been indicated as a proper tool for micelles size determination due to its ability to distinguish particles with different dimensions in a mixture as well as to operate at room temperature, thus allowing the analysis of biological samples close to native and physiological conditions.

    “AFM has been indicated as a proper tool for micelles size determination due to its ability to distinguish particles with different dimensions in a mixture as well as to operate at room temperature, thus allowing the analysis of biological samples close to native and physiological conditions [133,[154][155][156].”

    From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DLS requires avoiding analysis of colored or fluorescent samples which could partially absorb the energy of the monochromatic light leading to an underestimation of particle size.

    “Firstly, the need to avoid the analysis of colored or fluorescent samples which could partially absorb the energy of the monochromatic light leading to an underestimation of the particles size.”

    From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Introduction and Conclusions discuss DLS errors associated with particle shape and data-analysis software, not sample color or fluorescence. The Methods describe a laser-based measurement but do not say that light absorption by colored or fluorescent samples causes particle-size underestimation (searched: colored or fluorescent samples, absorption, laser, underestimation). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]Chu B. Laser Light Scattering: Basic Principles and Practice Academic Press New York, NY, USA 1992
  2. [38]Siegert A.J.F. On the fluctuations in signals returned by many independently moving scatterers Massachusetts Institute of Technology Radiation Laboratory Report No. 465 MIT Cambridge, MA, USA 1949
  3. [42]Guinier A. Fournet G. Small Angle Scattering X-ray Wiley New York, NY, USA 1955

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ree, B. J., Lee, J., Satoh, Y., Kwon, K., Isono, T., Satoh, T., & Ree, M.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Department of Chemistry, Division of Advanced Materials Science, Polymer Research Institute, and Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Satoh, Toshifumi
  • Ree, Moonhor
Venue
Polymers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-12-05
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
1347
ISSN
2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903269357
Cited by
31
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Polymers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (18H04639)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H04152)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
Keywords
polymeric micelles, micelle morphology, cylindrical micelles, micelle size distribution, synchrotron X-ray scattering, poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review