Cited by 349Bone Tissue Engineering Materials3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAnatomy and Medical Technology

Unraveling of Advances in 3D-Printed Polymer-Based Bone Scaffolds

Open access
Xu, Yuanhang, Zhang, Feiyang, Zhai, Weijie, Cheng, Shujie, Li, Jinghua, Wang, Yi·2022·Polymers

Abstract

The repair of large-area irregular bone defects is one of the complex problems in orthopedic clinical treatment. The bone repair scaffolds currently studied include electrospun membrane, hydrogel, bone cement, 3D printed bone tissue scaffolds, etc., among which 3D printed polymer-based scaffolds Bone scaffolds are the most promising for clinical applications. This is because 3D printing is modeled based on the im-aging results of actual bone defects so that the printed scaffolds can perfectly fit the bone defect, and the printed components can be adjusted to promote Osteogenesis. This review introduces a variety of 3D printing technologies and bone healing processes, reviews previous studies on the characteristics of commonly used natural or synthetic polymers, and clinical applications of 3D printed bone tissue scaffolds, analyzes and elaborates the characteristics of ideal bone tissue scaffolds, from t he progress of 3D printing bone tissue scaffolds were summarized in many aspects. The challenges and potential prospects in this direction were discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/polym14030566

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLCL prepared by 3D printing can be controlled by adjusting printing parameters such as packing density and interlayer bonding to impart higher elastic modulus and fatigue strength, making it more suitable for long-term implantation.

    “The PLCL prepared by 3D printing can be controlled by adjusting the printing parameters, such as packing density and interlayer bonding, to impart higher elastic modulus and fatigue strength to the material, which is more suitable for long-term implantation scenarios [64].”

    From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [64]

    Section 5.2.3 (page not provided) says that adjusting SLS parameters can improve the mechanical strength of PCL scaffolds and that PCL can provide long-term support. It does not establish the claim for PLCL or report that packing density and interlayer bonding increase its elastic modulus and fatigue strength for long-term implantation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 187 · Cited by 349

Authors
Xu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhai, W., Cheng, S., Li, J., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (CN)
  • Henan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Jinghua
  • Wang, Yi
Venue
Polymers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-30
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
566
ISSN
2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210606618
Cited by
349
References
187
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 8
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Polymers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Hebei Natural Science Foundation (H2021201005)
  • National United Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Bearing Tribology (202105)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
3D-printed bone scaffolds, bone defects, bone tissue engineering, 3D printing technologies, bone regeneration, natural polymers, synthetic polymers, bone formation, scaffold design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review