Cited by 25Integrated Energy Systems OptimizationElectric Power System OptimizationOptimal Power Flow Distribution

Stochastic Optimization Operation of the Integrated Energy System Based on a Novel Scenario Generation Method

Open access
Zhang, Delong, Jiang, Siyu, Liu, Jinxin, Wang, Longze, Chen, Yongcong, Xiao, Yuxin, Jiao, Shucen, Xie, Yu +2 more·2022·Processes

Abstract

The application of integrated energy systems is significant for realizing the comprehensive utilization of various energy sources and improving the utilization rate of renewable energy. At present, the optimal operation of integrated energy systems is a research hotspot. However, shortcomings remain in the stochastic optimization operation and the scenario generation method. This paper proposes a stochastic optimization operation model of an integrated energy microgrid based on an advanced multi-scenario generation method. First, this paper establishes the time-divided probability distribution model of the forecasting error of the uncertain factors, such as photovoltaic (PV) power and load, which provide the basis for generating scenarios. Moreover, the covariance matrix is used to calculate the time correlation of the time-divided probabilistic distributed models, and the parameters of the covariance matrix are optimized. Second, based on multiple typical scenarios, the stochastic optimization operation model of the integrated energy microgrid is established. Finally, the real data is used to verify the proposed method. The results show that the nonparametric kernel density estimation method has the best fitting effect. On this basis, the time correlation and the operation costs are compared with the scenario sets generated by other methods, which proves the advantages of the proposed multi-scenario generation method and stochastic optimization operation model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/pr10020330

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvement of the PVHC has a regional character and cannot be solved with a set of universal precautions; a detailed simulation should be carried out for each case.

    “Improvement of the PHVC has always had a regional character and, therefore, cannot be solved with a set of universal precautions.Instead, a detailed simulation should be carried out for each case [50,51].”

    From Stochastic Approach for Increasing the PV Hosting Capacity of a Low-Voltage Distribution Network (2022) · cites this paper as [51]

    Section 4.3 describes simulations of stochastic operation in an integrated energy microgrid, and Section 4 identifies the particular microgrid studied. Neither passage addresses whether improving photovoltaic hosting capacity is region-specific, whether universal precautions are inadequate, or whether every case requires detailed simulation. Searches for hosting capacity and region-specific simulation found no passage making those points. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 25

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Chen, Y.; Deng, C.; Yao, W.; Liang, N.; Xia, P.; Cao, P.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, Y.-A.; Liu, Z.; Li, D.; et al. Impacts of stochastic forecast errors of renewable energy generation and load demands on microgrid operation. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 442-461. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Zakernezhad, H.; Nazar, M.S.; Shafie-Khah, M.; Catalão, J.P. Optimal resilient operation of multi-carrier energy systems in electricity markets considering distributed energy resource aggregators. Appl. Energy 2021, 299, 117271. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Yang, Z.; Wu, R.; Yang, J.; Long, K.; You, P. Economical Operation of Microgrid with Various Devices Via Distributed Optimization. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2015, 7, 857-867. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Gan, W.; Yan, M.; Yao, W.; Guo, J.; Ai, X.; Fang, J.; Wen, J. Decentralized computation method for robust operation of multi-area joint regional-district integrated energy systems with uncertain wind power. Appl. Energy 2021, 298, 117280. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Marino, C.; Marufuzzaman, M.; Hu, M.; Sarder, M. Developing a CCHP-microgrid operation decision model under uncertainty. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2018, 115, 354-367. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, X. Optimal Operation Strategy of Multi-Energy Complementary Distributed CCHP System and its Application on Commercial Building. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 127839-127849. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, F.; Zeng, M.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, F. Planning and operation method of the regional integrated energy system considering economy and environment. Energy 2019, 171, 731-750. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Mu, C.; Ding, T.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, P.; He, Y.; Chen, T. Optimal operation model of integrated energy system for industrial plants considering cascade utilisation of heat energy. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2020, 14, 352-363. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. He, J.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Tong, H.; Yuan, Z.; Yang, X.; Huang, W. Application of Game Theory in Integrated Energy System Systems: A Review. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 93380-93397. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Yan, M.; He, Y.; Shahidehpour, M.; Ai, X.; Li, Z.; Wen, J. Coordinated Regional-District Operation of Integrated Energy Systems for Resilience Enhancement in Natural Disasters. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2019, 10, 4881-4892. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Yi, Z.; Xu, Y.; Hu, J.; Chow, M.-Y.; Sun, H. Distributed, Neurodynamic-Based Approach for Economic Dispatch in an Integrated Energy System. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 16, 2245-2257. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Sun, Y.; Zhang, B.; Ge, L.; Sidorov, D.; Wang, J.; Xu, Z. Day-ahead optimization schedule for gas-electric integrated energy system based on second-order cone programming. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 6, 142-151. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Guo, H.; Shi, T.; Wang, F.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Z. Adaptive clustering-based hierarchical layout optimisation for large-scale integrated energy systems. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2020, 14, 3336-3345. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Yang, S.; Tan, Z.; Lin, H.; Li, P.; De, G.; Zhou, F.; Ju, L. A two-stage optimization model for Park Integrated Energy System operation and benefit allocation considering the effect of Time-Of-Use energy price. Energy 2020, 195, 117013. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Chen, S.; Wang, S. An Optimization Method for an Integrated Energy System Scheduling Process Based on NSGA-II Improved by Tent Mapping Chaotic Algorithms. Processes 2020, 8, 426. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Tan, Z.; Yang, S.; Lin, H.; De, G.; Ju, L.; Zhou, F. Multi-scenario operation optimization model for park integrated energy system based on multi-energy demand response. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101973. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Yan, R.; Lu, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Huang, D. Stochastic multi-scenario optimization for a hybrid combined cooling, heating and power system considering multi-criteria. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 233, 113911. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Ma, X.-Y.; Sun, Y.-Z.; Fang, H.-L.; Tian, Y. Scenario-Based Multiobjective Decision-Making of Optimal Access Point for Wind Power Transmission Corridor in the Load Centers. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2012, 4, 229-239. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Yoshida, K.; Negishi, S.; Takayama, S.; Ishigame, A. A stochastic scheduled operation of wind farm based on scenarios of the generated power with copula. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 2018, 205, 41-54. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Mohammadi, S.; Soleymani, S.; Mozafari, B. Scenario-based stochastic operation management of MicroGrid including Wind, Photovoltaic, Micro-Turbine, Fuel Cell and Energy Storage Devices. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 54, 525-535. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Niknam, T.; Azizipanah-Abarghooee, R.; Narimani, M.R. An efficient scenario-based stochastic programming framework for multi-objective optimal micro-grid operation. Appl. Energy 2012, 99, 455-470. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Zhao, L.; Huang, Y.; Dai, Q.; Yang, L.; Chen, F.; Wang, L.; Sun, K.; Huang, J.; Lin, Z. Multistage Active Distribution Network Planning With Restricted Operation Scenario Selection. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 121067-121080. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Jafari, E.; Soleymani, S.; Mozafari, B.; Amraee, T. Scenario-based stochastic optimal operation of wind/PV/FC/CHP/boiler/tidal/ energy storage system considering DR programs and uncertainties. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2018, 8, 2. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Rachunok, B.; Staid, A.; Watson, J.-P.; Woodruff, D.L. Assessment of wind power scenario creation methods for stochastic power systems operations. Appl. Energy 2020, 268, 114986. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Pinson, P.; Madsen, H.; Nielsen, H.A.; Papaefthymiou, G.; Klöckl, B. From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production. Wind Energy 2009, 12, 51-62. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Pinson, P.; Girard, R. Evaluating the quality of scenarios of short-term wind power generation. Appl. Energy 2012, 96, 12-20. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Ma, X.-Y.; Sun, Y.-Z.; Fang, H.-L. Scenario Generation of Wind Power Based on Statistical Uncertainty and Variability. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2013, 4, 894-904. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Bao, Z.; Qiu, W.; Wu, L.; Zhai, F.; Xu, W.; Li, B.; Li, Z. Optimal Multi-Timescale Demand Side Scheduling Considering Dynamic Scenarios of Electricity Demand. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 10, 2428-2439. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Zhou, B.; Ma, X.; Luo, Y.; Yang, D. Wind Power Prediction Based on LSTM Networks and Nonparametric Kernel Density Estimation. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 165279-165292. [CrossRef · DOI

Authors
Zhang, D., Jiang, S., Liu, J., Wang, L., Chen, Y., Xiao, Y., Jiao, S., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, M.
Affiliations
North China Electric Power University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Meicheng
Venue
Processes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-09
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
330
ISSN
2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211188295
Cited by
25
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974055 and 51772096)
  • Project Supported by Science and Technology Project of SGCC (SGJX0000KXJS1900321)
  • Beijing Science and Technology Project (Z181100005118002)
  • Par-Eu Scholars Program (Par-Eu Scholars Program)
  • Science and Technology Beijing 100 Leading Talent Training Project (Science and Technology Beijing 100 Leading Talent Training Project)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2020FR002, 2020MS023, 2020MS028)
  • NCEPU "Double First-Class" Program (NCEPU "Double First-Class" Program)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
integrated energy systems, microgrids, stochastic optimization, scenario generation, load forecasting errors, covariance matrix, temporal correlation, kernel density estimation, operating costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review