Cited by 6Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Consumer acceptance and nutritional expectations of microalgae protein products: insights from a cross-european study

Open access
Hung, Yung, Van der Stricht, Hélène, Verbeke, Wim·2023·The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023

Abstract

Alternative proteins, such as microalgae proteins, have the potential to mitigate climate change impacts and foster sustainable development [...]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/proceedings2023091087

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reviews and discrete choice studies also indicate that acceptance is still conditional, presenting marked differences between countries and market segments.

    “Reviews and discrete choice studies also indicate that acceptance is still conditional, presenting marked differences between countries and market segments (Van der Stricht et al., 2023; Olsen et al., 2024; Hung et al., 2023).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Hung et al., 2023

    The main study passage (page not specified) reports three groups—enthusiast, uncertain, and uninterested—with different determinants of willingness to try microalgae products, supporting conditional acceptance across consumer segments. It surveyed five countries but does not report differences between them. It describes a cross-sectional survey and regression analysis, not a review or discrete choice study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hung, Y., Van der Stricht, H., & Verbeke, W.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
Corresponding author
Hung, Yung
Venue
The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023
Publisher
MDPI
Published
2023-11-24
Pages
87
OpenAlex
W4388974790
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
6.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Nutrition Conference (FENS) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (862980)
  • EU-funded project ProFuture (862980)
  • Research Foundation of Flanders (FWO) (862980)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
microalgal proteins, consumer acceptance, alternative protein sources, sustainable food systems, cross-European comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review