CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 303Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsData Analysis and ArchivingComputational and Text Analysis Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Qualitative Methods with Nvivo Software: A Practical Guide for Analyzing Qualitative Data

Open access
Allsop, David B., Chelladurai, Joe M., Kimball, Elisabeth R., Marks, Loren D., Hendricks, Justin J.·2022·Psych
DOI 10.3390/psych4020013
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

From 1995–2016, there has been a 15-fold increase in qualitative scholarship in the social sciences, but the rigor and quality of published work has ranged widely. Little scholarship provides concrete, pragmatic explanations of (and directions regarding) the execution of systematic, high-rigor qualitative analysis. The present article guides the developing qualitative researcher through technical and procedural aspects of analyzing qualitative data with specific attention to reliability and rigor. Guidance addressing transcription, importing data, forming coding pairs, performing initial/open coding (examples of three types), determining core themes, systematic team-based coding, maintaining a data audit trail, creating a Numeric Content Analysis (NCA) table, and preparing work for publication is provided. Materials include several tables and figures that offer practical demonstrations on how to use Nvivo in data analysis. Transcription tips and outsourcing benefits and cautions are also offered. Altogether, the present article provides qualitative researchers practical guidance for executing multiple stages of qualitative analysis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/psych4020013

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fielding, N.G., and Lee, R.M. (1999). Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 303

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Allsop, D. B., Chelladurai, J. M., Kimball, E. R., Marks, L. D., & Hendricks, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Allsop, David B.
ORCID
Venue
Psych
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-22
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
142-159
ISSN
2624-8611 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/psych4020013
OpenAlex
W4293104574
Cited by
302
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 5
FWCI
111.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Psych (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
qualitative data analysis, coding, open coding, audit trail, transcription, research rigor, reliability statistics, manuscript preparation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review