Psychiatric Illness and Medical Decision-Making Capacity: A Retrospective Study in Medical Settings
Open accessAbstract
Determination of medical decision-making capacity (DMC) is one of the common encounters in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (CLP) services. It is a common misbelief that patients with “psych history” lack capacity more often than patients without mental illness. The study aims to examine the relationship between mental illness and DMC in patients presented to acute medical settings. The study is a retrospective chart review, where data were collected from the patients admitted to the medical units and assessed for capacity by a psychiatrist. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared between two groups (patients having capacity and lacking capacity) using t-tests or chi-square tests, as appropriate. The commonest reason for DMC evaluation requests was for the patients who wanted to leave the hospital against medical advice. Overall, 53% (52/98) of the patients evaluated for DMC were found to lack capacity. Group of patients lacking DMC had a significantly higher percentage of males (58% vs. 35%) but were significantly less employed (8% vs. 10%). No significant difference was observed in other demographic characteristics and primary psychiatric diagnoses (past and current) among the two groups. However, patients lacking capacity were found to have a significantly more occurrence of current (48% vs. 11%) and past (23% vs. 4%) history of neurocognitive disorder, and larger trend significance (31% vs. 15%) of active psychiatric symptoms. We conclude that patients with neurocognitive disorders and active psychiatric symptoms might have poor DMC but not all patients who have psychiatric diagnoses lack medical DMC. Larger studies especially in outpatient psychiatric settings are suggested to derive more conclusive results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals exhibiting more severe symptoms are more likely to be perceived as incapable of understanding and therefore of making decisions.
“Considering that individuals exhibiting more severe symptoms are more likely to be perceived as incapable of understanding and therefore of making decisions [175,176]”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [176]
Cites
Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to Treatment
Appelbaum, P. S. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp074045 · Cited by 1,427 · see citing works
Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review
Okai, D., Owen, G., McGuire, H., Singh, S., Churchill, R., & Hotopf, M. (2007) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.035162 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review
Hindmarch, T., Hotopf, M., & Owen, G. S. (2013) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-54 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The recovery of factors associated with decision-making capacity in individuals with psychosis
Fernandez, C., Kennedy, H. G., & Kennedy, M. (2017) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004226 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review
Lessard-Deschênes, C., Pariseau-Legault, P., Billé, V., Sergerie-Richard, S., Hudson, E., Silva, B., Drouin, J.-S., Désilets, M., & Goulet, M.-H. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13151868 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sangroula, D., Mainali, P., Hagi, K., & Peteru, S.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
- Nassau University Medical Center (US)
- Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Sangroula, Dinesh
- Venue
- Psychiatry International
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-12-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-124
- ISSN
- 2673-5318 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3110454846
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychiatry International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- medical decision-making capacity, mental illness, psychosomatic medicine, neurocognitive disorders, psychiatric symptoms, acute medical inpatients, capacity assessment, psychiatric comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review