Cited by 19Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The recovery of factors associated with decision-making capacity in individuals with psychosis

Open access
Fernandez, Colin, Kennedy, Harry G., Kennedy, Miriam·2017·BJPsych Open

Abstract

Background: There is limited data on the recovery of factors associated with decisional capacity in patients with psychosis. Aims: To study the relationship between changes in mental capacity, symptoms and global functioning using structured measures during treatment for psychosis. Method: Fifty-six patients with psychosis were assessed for capacity to consent to treatment on admission and at 6 and 12 weeks following treatment. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool – Treatment, the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale were used to measure mental capacities, symptom severity and global functioning respectively. Treating consultants rated capacity to consent, masked to these measures. Results: Greater impairments on all measures were found in patients assessed as lacking capacity. These improved with treatment over 12 weeks with significant effect sizes (0.5 to 0.6). Stronger correlations between mental capacities, positive symptoms (-0.47) and global functioning (0.56) were noted in the first 6 weeks. Conclusions: Impairments in capacity in acute stages of psychosis are related to symptom severity and functional impairment. They improve during treatment, particularly in the first 6 weeks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004226

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals exhibiting more severe symptoms are more likely to be perceived as incapable of understanding and therefore of making decisions.

    “Considering that individuals exhibiting more severe symptoms are more likely to be perceived as incapable of understanding and therefore of making decisions [175,176]”

    From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Results report that hospitalized patients with psychosis whom clinicians judged to lack capacity had more severe symptoms and lower understanding scores. The Clinical implications section also says clinicians may be influenced by deficits in understanding. The claim extends this finding to individuals generally, whereas the study concerns patients with psychosis and capacity to consent to treatment. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [11]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and Schizophrenia in Adults: Prevention and Management. NICE, 2014 (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178). 32207892
  2. [25]Candia PC, Barba AC. Mental capacity and consent to treatment in psychiatric patients. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2011; 24: 442– 6. 21743329
  3. [28]American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). APA, 2000.
  4. [29]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in Adults: Recognition and Management (CG90). NICE, 2009 (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90). 31990491
  5. [39]O’Reilly K, Donohoe G, Coyle C, O’Sullivan D, Rowe A, Losty M, et al Prospective cohort study of the relationship between neuro-cognition, social cognition and violence in forensic patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 10: 155. PMC4496853 26159728

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernandez, C., Kennedy, H. G., & Kennedy, M.
Affiliations
  • St. Patrick's Hospital (IE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Harry G.
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2017-05
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
113-119
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610902548
Cited by
19
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
decision-making capacity, psychosis, consent to treatment, treatment recovery, positive symptoms, global functioning, functional disability, acute psychosis, antipsychotic drugs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review