Cited by 27Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open AccessLibrary Science and Information

Landscapes of Research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) Publishing in the Arts and Humanities

Open access
Gross, Julia, Ryan, John·2015·Publications

Abstract

It is widely known now that scholarly communication is in crisis, resting on an academic publishing model that is unsustainable. One response to this crisis has been the emergence of Open Access (OA) publishing, bringing scholarly literature out from behind a paywall and making it freely available to anyone online. Many research and academic libraries are facilitating the change to OA by establishing institutional repositories, supporting OA policies, and hosting OA journals. In addition, research funding bodies, such as the Australian Research Council (ARC), are mandating that all published grant research outputs be made available in OA, unless legal and contractual obligations prevent this. Despite these broader changes, not all scholars are aware of the new publishing environment. In particular, the rate of adoption of OA models in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) has historically been lower than Science, Technology and Medicine (STM) disciplines. Nevertheless, some local and international OA exemplars exist in HSS. At Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia, the faculty-administered environmental humanities journal, Landscapes, was migrated to the institutional open access repository in 2013. Subsequently, researchers in the Faculty of Education and Arts were surveyed regarding their knowledge, understandings, and perceptions of OA publishing. The survey was also designed to elicit the barriers to OA publishing perceived or experienced by HSS researchers. This article will present the findings of our small faculty-based OA survey, with particular attention to HSS academics (and within this subject group, particular attention to the arts and humanities), their perceptions of OA, and the impediments they encounter. We argue that OA publishing will continue to transform scholarship within the arts and humanities, especially through the role of institutional repositories. The “library-as-publisher” role offers the potential to transform academic and university-specific publishing activities. However, the ongoing training of university researchers and personnel is required to bring into balance their understandings of OA publisher and the demands of the broader Australian and international research environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/publications3020065

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Humanities have different scholarship cultures compared to Natural Sciences and have been slow in adopting open access overall.

    “The Humanities have different scholarship cultures as compared to the Natural Sciences and have been slow in adopting open access overall (Eve 2017;Gross and Ryan 2015).”

    From Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020) · cites this paper as Gross and Ryan 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Suber, P. Open Access; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012.
  2. Bosch, S.; Henderson, K. Steps down the Evolutionary Road: Periodicals Price Survey 2014; Library Journal: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
  3. Halevi, G.; Bar-Ilan, J. Trends in arts and humanities funding 2004-2012. In Research Trends; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.
  4. Andrew, W., Ed.; Mellon Foundation: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 1-55.
  5. Unsworth, J. The crisis of audience. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Library Association, Orlando, FL, USA, 26 June 2004.
  6. SAGE Publications. Sage Open. Available online:http://intl-sgo.sagepub.com/ (accessed on 4 November 2014).
  7. Harris, S. Moving Towards an Open Access Future: The Role of Academic Libraries; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012.
  8. Frass, W.; Cross, J.; Gardner, V. Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey June 2014; Taylor & Francis: Milton Park, 2014. Available online: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/open- access-survey-june2014.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2015).
  9. The British Library. Open Access Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences Conference; The British Library: London, UK, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gross, J., & Ryan, J.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ryan, John
Venue
Publications
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-04-17
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
65-88
ISSN
2304-6775 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132387219
Cited by
27
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Publications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Edith Cowan University
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
open access publishing, scholarly communication, humanities and social sciences, arts and humanities, institutional repositories, barriers to open access, researcher perceptions, scholarly publishing models, Edith Cowan University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review