Landscapes of Research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) Publishing in the Arts and Humanities
Open accessAbstract
It is widely known now that scholarly communication is in crisis, resting on an academic publishing model that is unsustainable. One response to this crisis has been the emergence of Open Access (OA) publishing, bringing scholarly literature out from behind a paywall and making it freely available to anyone online. Many research and academic libraries are facilitating the change to OA by establishing institutional repositories, supporting OA policies, and hosting OA journals. In addition, research funding bodies, such as the Australian Research Council (ARC), are mandating that all published grant research outputs be made available in OA, unless legal and contractual obligations prevent this. Despite these broader changes, not all scholars are aware of the new publishing environment. In particular, the rate of adoption of OA models in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) has historically been lower than Science, Technology and Medicine (STM) disciplines. Nevertheless, some local and international OA exemplars exist in HSS. At Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia, the faculty-administered environmental humanities journal, Landscapes, was migrated to the institutional open access repository in 2013. Subsequently, researchers in the Faculty of Education and Arts were surveyed regarding their knowledge, understandings, and perceptions of OA publishing. The survey was also designed to elicit the barriers to OA publishing perceived or experienced by HSS researchers. This article will present the findings of our small faculty-based OA survey, with particular attention to HSS academics (and within this subject group, particular attention to the arts and humanities), their perceptions of OA, and the impediments they encounter. We argue that OA publishing will continue to transform scholarship within the arts and humanities, especially through the role of institutional repositories. The “library-as-publisher” role offers the potential to transform academic and university-specific publishing activities. However, the ongoing training of university researchers and personnel is required to bring into balance their understandings of OA publisher and the demands of the broader Australian and international research environment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Humanities have different scholarship cultures compared to Natural Sciences and have been slow in adopting open access overall.
“The Humanities have different scholarship cultures as compared to the Natural Sciences and have been slow in adopting open access overall (Eve 2017;Gross and Ryan 2015).”
From Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020) · cites this paper as Gross and Ryan 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?
Antelman, K. (2004) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.65.5.372 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Suber, P. (2012) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity
Lessig, L. (2008) · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Weller, M. (2011) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781849666275 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Finch, J., Bell, S., Bellingan, L., et al. (2014) · Estudis Romànics (Institut d'Estudis Catalans) · doi:10.2436/cs.v10i1.136958 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
A Very Brief Introduction to Open Access
Suber, P. (2006) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) · Cited by 91 · see citing works
The Faustian grip of academic publishing
Parks, R. P. (2002) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178022000015122 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Electronic scholarly publishing and open access
Oppenheim, C. (2008) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551508092268 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Researchers' green open access practice: a cross‐disciplinary analysis
Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Probets, S. G., & White, S. (2013) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-01-2012-0008 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
SPARC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition
BUCKHOLTZ, W. A., & TAKAGI, T. K. (2002) · Journal of Information Processing and Management · doi:10.1241/johokanri.45.336 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Epstein, D. B. A., Levy, S. V. F., & de la Llave, R. (1992) · Experimental Mathematics · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Promoting Open Access in the Humanities
Suber, P. (2005) · Syllecta classica · doi:10.1353/syl.2005.0001 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Open access must enable open use
Neylon, C. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/492348a · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Eve, M. P. (2014) · Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication · doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1131 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Hope, C., & Ryan, J. J. (2014) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781501388347 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationTear it down, build it up: the Research Output Team, or the library-as-publisher
Eve, M. P. (2012) · Insights the UKSG journal · doi:10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.158 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
OA Impact Advantage = EA + (AA) + (QB) + QA + (CA) + UA
Harnad, S. R. (2005) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Dieci anni dopo la Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI10, 2012)
JLIS.it, R. (2012) · Università di Firenze - Italian Journal of Library and Information Science · doi:10.4403/jlis.it-8631 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Godlee, F. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1051 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Xia, J. (2013) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications1030113 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Aphra Behn Online: The Case for Early Modern Open-Access Publishing
Runge, L. L. (2013) · Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies · doi:10.1353/jem.2013.0054 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Open Access in Humanities and Social Sciences
Ferwerda, E. (2014) · Septentrio Conference Series · doi:10.7557/5.3139 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Suber, P. Open Access; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012.
- Bosch, S.; Henderson, K. Steps down the Evolutionary Road: Periodicals Price Survey 2014; Library Journal: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
- Halevi, G.; Bar-Ilan, J. Trends in arts and humanities funding 2004-2012. In Research Trends; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.
- Andrew, W., Ed.; Mellon Foundation: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 1-55.
- Unsworth, J. The crisis of audience. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Library Association, Orlando, FL, USA, 26 June 2004.
- SAGE Publications. Sage Open. Available online:http://intl-sgo.sagepub.com/ (accessed on 4 November 2014).
- Harris, S. Moving Towards an Open Access Future: The Role of Academic Libraries; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012.
- Frass, W.; Cross, J.; Gardner, V. Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey June 2014; Taylor & Francis: Milton Park, 2014. Available online: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/open- access-survey-june2014.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2015).
- The British Library. Open Access Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences Conference; The British Library: London, UK, 2013.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science
Wolfram, D., Wang, P., Hembree, A., & Park, H. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gross, J., & Ryan, J.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ryan, John
- Venue
- Publications
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2015-04-17
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 65-88
- ISSN
- 2304-6775 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132387219
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Publications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Edith Cowan University
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- open access publishing, scholarly communication, humanities and social sciences, arts and humanities, institutional repositories, barriers to open access, researcher perceptions, scholarly publishing models, Edith Cowan University
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review