Cited by 4Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mea Culpa: A Qualitative Interview Study on the Role of Guilt and Forgiveness with Non-Religious and Multireligious Inmates

Open access

Abstract

Within monotheistic religions, guilt and forgiveness have long been important themes. In The Netherlands, however, the influence of traditional religions is declining. This qualitative interview study explored how non-religious and multireligious inmates experience guilt and forgiveness, and how the humanistic chaplain could address these issues within counselling. Guilt and forgiveness are complex constructs that are individually and subjectively experienced. Most inmates experience personal guilt and regret for what they have done. Some inmates cope with these feelings in a repressive way, where others have an active coping style. Both multireligious and non-religious inmates have a need for interpersonal forgiveness, especially from close relatives. In addition, multireligious inmates also have a transcendent need for forgiveness from a personal god. The humanistic chaplain may help inmates with an active reflection on guilt and forgiveness, which can contribute to a development on an existential level. Guilt and forgiveness ought to be approached from a counselling perspective and attention should be paid to the multiple meanings of personal responsibility. An active and critical reflection on guilt and forgiveness may lead to new meanings of the (criminal) past and create a positive change in the behaviour of detainees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rel13020145

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Borgdorff, Marianne (2011). Herstelgericht Pastoraat: Wat Is Herstelgericht Pastoraat en Hoe Verhoudt Zich dit tot Eerdere Pastorale Benaderingen in de Jaren ’60–’70? [Restorative Pastoral Care: What Is Restorative Pastoral Care and How Does It Compare to Earlier Approaches in the 1960s and 1970s?]. [Bachelor thesis, Utrecht University]. Available online: http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/209239.
  2. De Caluwé, Elien (2010). De Relatie Tussen Cognitieve Inhibitie van Emotionele Informatie en Correlaten van Depressie [The Relationship between Cognitive Inhibition of Emotional Information and Correlates of Depression]. [Master’s thesis, Leuven University]. Available online: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4243758/file/4285791.
  3. Greijn, 2020, Thuis in meerdere culturen. Hybriditeit bij jonge patiënten met een Turkse of Marokkaanse achtergrond in de palliatieve fase [At home in Cultural Hybridity in young patients with a Turkish or Moroccan background in the palliative phase], Tijdschrift Geestelijke Verzorging [Journal of Spiritual Care], 23, 22
  4. Kalsky, 2017, Flexible Believers in The Netherlands. A Paradigm Shift towards Transreligious Multiplicity, Open Theology (Topical Issue Multiple Religious Belonging), 3, 345
  5. Sikkens, Elga (2009). De Rol van Vrienden in Desistance: Waarom Jeugdige Veelplegers Stoppen Met Criminaliteit [The Role of Friends in Desistance: Why Juvenile Repeat Offenders Quit Crime]. [Master’s thesis, Utrecht University]. Available online: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/3473.
  6. 2018, Godsdienstvrijheid en meervoudige religieuze betrokkenheid: Naar een intercultureel perspectief [Religious freedom and multiple religious belonging: Towards an intercultural perspective], Tijdschrift voor Recht en Religie [Journal for Law and Religion], 2, 159

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
van Herpen, M., & Kruizinga, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Spiritual Care Service, Custodial Institutions Agency, 2509 LV The Hague, The Netherlands
  • University of Humanistic Studies (NL)
Corresponding author
van Herpen, Mickey
Venue
Religions
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
145
ISSN
2077-1444 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210705586
Cited by
3
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Religions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Humanistic Studies OAI Repository (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
guilt, forgiveness, prison chaplaincy, interpersonal forgiveness, personal responsibility, declining religiosity, existential reflection, criminal history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review