Cited by 3Biblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical and Linguistic StudiesHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apocryphal Gospel Titles in Coptic

Open access
Falkenberg, René·2022·Religions

Abstract

During the 2nd–5th centuries, the usual format of the canonical gospel title is “The Gospel According to [person]”. While becoming well-established in this period, the title is reused and transformed when naming the apocryphal gospels. In order to study the meaning of the emerging canonical and apocryphal gospel titles, the claims of these titles will be analysed to determine who each title presents as the gospel’s source (often a divine figure) and who is implied to be that gospel’s author (often a human person). By revisiting well-known apocryphal gospels, and expanding on their number, new insights are achieved regarding the role of titles, authors, and apocryphal gospels. Results concern, for instance, the long recension of the Apocryphon of John, whose title comes to display a prominent gospel title; the Gospel of Judas, of which the author may be the infamous Judas himself; and the Gospel of Truth, which may not be an apocryphal gospel at all.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rel13090796

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bombeck, 2001, Pseudo-Kyrillos In Mariam virginem: Text und Übersetzung von Pierpont Morgan M 597 fols. 46-74, Orientalia, 70, 40
  2. A. Pearson, Birger (1996). Apocalypse of Peter. Nag Hammadi Codex VII, E.J. Brill. NHMS 30.
  3. Brodie, 2006, The lost, found, lost again and found again Gospel of Judas, Culture Without Context: The Newsletter of the Illicit Antiquities Research Centre, 19, 17
  4. Immerzeel, Mat, van der Vliet, Jacques, Kersten, Maarten, and van Zoest, Carolien (2004). Titles in the Coptic Manuscript Tradition: Complex Structure Titles and Extended Complex Structure Titles. Coptic Studies on the Threshold of a New Millennium I: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Coptie Studies, Leiden, 27 August–2 September 2000, Peeters. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 133.
  5. Kasser, Rodolphe, and Robinson, James M. (1975). The Facsimile Edition of the Nag Hammadi Codices: Codex IV, E.J. Brill.
  6. Layton, Bentley (1989a). The Gospel According to Thomas. Nag Hammadi Codex II,2–7 Together with XIII,2*, Brit. Lib. Or.4926(1), and P. Oxy. 1, 654, 655 with Contributions from Many Scholars. Volume One: Gospel According to Thomas, Gospel According to Philip, Hypostasis of the Archons, and Indexes, E.J. Brill. NHS 20. · DOI
  7. Layton, Bentley (1989b). The Hypostasis of the Archons. Nag Hammadi Codex II,2–7 together with XIII,2*, Brit. Lib. Or.4926(1), and P. Oxy. 1, 654, 655 with Contributions from Many Scholars. Volume One: Gospel According to Thomas, Gospel According to Philip, Hypostasis of the Archons, and Indexes, E.J. Brill. NHS 20. · DOI
  8. M. Parrott, Douglas (1979b). Authoritative Teaching. Nag Hammadi Codices V,2–5 and VI with Papyrus Berolinensis 8502,1 and 4, E.J. Brill. NHS 11. · DOI
  9. W. Attridge, Harold (1985). The Treatise on the Resurrection. Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex): Intoductions, Texts, Translations, Indices, E.J. Brill. NHS 22. · DOI
  10. Pearson, Birger A. (1996). The Three Steles of Seth. Nag Hammadi Codex VII, E.J. Brill. NHMS 30. · DOI
  11. Robinson, James M. (1977). The Facsimile Edition of the Nag Hammadi Codices: Codex I, E.J. Brill.
  12. Shoemaker, Stephen J. (2016). Mary in Faith and Devotion, Yale University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Falkenberg, R.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Falkenberg, René
Venue
Religions
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-29
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
796
ISSN
2077-1444 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293660979
Cited by
3
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Religions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
apocryphal gospels, Coptic language, Gospels, Apocryphon of John, Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Truth, authorship, divine authorship, early Christian literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review