The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 51 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment
Open accessAbstract
The Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment, also known as Yuanjuejing 圓覺經 or, in full, Dafang guangyuanjue xiuduoluo liaoyijing 大方廣圓覺修多羅了義經, is a mindfulness meditation sutra with a particularly high reputation that has been the subject of a great deal of annotations and commentaries throughout the history of East Asian Buddhism. However, hitherto, the literature has not systematically organized and studied these annotations and commentaries. The aim of this paper is to organize the Chinese commentaries on this sutra from the 8th to the 17th centuries systematically and tointroduce the different situations by the commentaries produced by different schools of Buddhism. Briefly, these works mainly include the commentaries by Weique 惟愨, Wushi 悟實, Jianzhi 堅志, Daoquan 道詮, and Tsung-mi 宗密 during the Tang Dynasty (618–907); the commentaries of the Huayan 華嚴宗, Tiantai 天臺宗, and Chan 禪宗 schools during the Song Dynasty (960–1279); and the literal interpretations and collected commentaries produced during the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912).
Overview
CoChat Summary
TL;DR
This article systematically organizes Chinese commentaries on the *Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment* from the Tang through Qing dynasties, with attention to Huayan, Tiantai, and Chan schools. It argues that Tsung-mi’s Huayan-Chan commentaries were pivotal, while later commentaries show sectarian competition, practical adaptation, and declining theoretical innovation in Ming-Qing.
Key findings
- Tang commentaries are represented by four early Chan monks—Weique, Wushi, Jianzhi, and Daoquan—whose works are no longer extant and survive only in fragments in Tsung-mi’s writings, plus seven important commentaries attributed to Tsung-mi, centered on the *Full Commentary on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment* (written 823; 12 volumes in one edition). Tsung-mi’s commentary combines Huayan “arising of nature” with Chan “divinatory knowing.”
- Song Huayan commentaries were strongly sectarian and constructive: Guanfu recorded 103 errors in the *Sub-Commentary on The Abridged Commentary*, and debated Shihui over whether the sutra was “common teaching” or also “distinct teaching”; Qingyuan’s work discusses Huayan 287 times, five times as much as Tiantai content.
- Song Tiantai and Chan commentaries used their own frameworks: Shanyue applied Tiantai “Five-Sectioned Interpretation”; Zhicong’s *Mind Mirror* (1227) mentions the *Lotus Sutra* 37 times and Tiantai 26 times, and was completed in six volumes after a 400,000 qian grant; Emperor Xiaozong’s imperial exegesis simplified Tsung-mi and used Southern Chan No-Thought, No-Form, and Non-Abiding.
- Ming-Qing commentaries, including works by Deqing, Tongrun, Jizheng, Jiaohong, Tongli, Hongli, and Jingting, largely lack theoretical innovation, often follow Tsung-mi, and favor popular or concise interpretation; Deqing used Huayan “Ten Xuan Men” and Tiantai “Five Xuanyi.”
Methods
- The paper is a systematic historical and textual review of Chinese commentaries on the *Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment* from the Tang (618–907) to the Qing (1636–1912), organized by dynasty and Buddhist school.
- It draws on primary commentaries in canons such as the Jiaxing Canon, *Manji Zokuzōkyō*, *Manji Shinsan Dainihon Zokuzōkyō*, and Taishō Tripitaka, along with secondary scholarship in Chinese, Japanese, and English.
- Analysis is descriptive and bibliographic, comparing authorship, textual history, doctrinal emphases, and school affiliations rather than using quantitative or empirical methods.
Limitations
- The paper states that earlier scholarship was incomplete: Yusuki Ryoei did not analyze commentary characteristics or cover northwest China and the Jiaxing Buddhist Canon; Gong Jun did not study Ming-Qing commentaries or northwest China/Jiaxing Canon materials; English scholarship has only brief introductions.
- The text makes evident that many commentaries are lost or fragmentary—especially the four Tang monks’ works—and that biographical details for several commentators are unknown, limiting comprehensive assessment.
- The paper does not include a formal limitations section; it also relies on premodern attributions and reported figures without independent verification.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 Valid · 11 Not valid · 50 Not checked · 55 Own results and interpretations
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research concerning the Chinese commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment is even rarer in English scholarship.”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The annotations and commentaries of the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment produced during the Tang Dynasty are represented by the commentaries written by the four Chan monks Weique 惟愨, Wushi 悟實, Jianzhi 堅志, Daoquan 道詮, which were collected by Tsung-mi 宗密, as well as the commentaries written by Tsung-mi himself, such as the Yuanjue jing da shu 圓覺經大疏 (Full Commentary on the Sutra of Perfect Enlighten”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 2. Commentaries in the Tang Dynasty (618-907)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The four Chan monks mentioned in Tsung-mi's works are the earliest known Chinese individuals to comment on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment.”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 2. Commentaries in the Tang Dynasty (618-907)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, none of these studies have comprehensively introduced these Chinese commentaries to English-speaking scholars.”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hitherto, only Yusuki Ryoei and Gong Jun have conducted systematic studies of the Chinese commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment produced over a long period of time.”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
31 more claims
Create a free account to see all 116 claims and every source verdict.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 62
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 4. Commentaries in the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) and Qing Dynasty (1636-1912)
“## 4. Commentaries in the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) and Qing Dynasty (1636-1912)”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 1. Introduction
“Ming (1368-1644), and Qing (1644-1912) Dynasties”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 3.1. Commentaries of the Huayan School
“The third commentator and commentary work are Shanxi (1148-1204) and his Refute the Fallacy.”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 3.1. Commentaries of the Huayan School
“The thirdcommentator and commentary work are Xingting and his Categorized Interpretations of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > Abstract
“The aim of this paper is to organize the Chinese commentaries on this sutra from the 8th to the 17th centuries systematically”
§ A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment > 4. Commentaries in the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) and Qing Dynasty (1636-1912)
“The fifth commentator and commentary work are Tongli 通理 (1701-1782) and his Yuanjue jing xi yi shu 圓覺經析義疏 (Commentaries of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment) (X0263).”
Citations
Cites
The will to orthodoxy: a critical genealogy of Northern Chan Buddhism
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-6173 · Cited by 26
Gregory, P. N. (1987) · University of Hawaii Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780824890773 · Cited by 24
Shen-hui and the Teaching of Sudden Enlightenment in Early Ch'an Buddhism
McRae, J. R. (1987) · University of Hawaii Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780824890773-009 · Cited by 8
Anti-Chan Polemics in Post Tang Tiantai
Ziporyn, B. (1994) · The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies · Cited by 6
Chinese and Tibetan Sources on the Dhāraṇī in Roll Seven of the *Śūraṃgama-sūtra
Keyworth, G. A. (2022) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2022.2058776 · Cited by 2
Jia, J. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13060474 · Cited by 1
Understanding Tsung-mi's view on Buddha Nature
Kim, S.-U. (2007) · Cited by 1
The Integration of CH"AN/SON and The Teachings(CHIAO/KYO) in TSUNG-MI and CHINUL
Gregory, P. N. (1988) · 보조사상 · Cited by 1
Chinese and Tibetan Sources on the Dhāraṇī in Roll Seven of the *Śūraṃgama-sūtra
Keyworth, G. A. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003434917-3 · Cited by 1
(2021) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Gregory, Peter N. (1991). Tsung-mi and the Sinification of Buddhism, Princeton University Press.
- Hanshan (1994). Literal Interpretation of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 10, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Hu, Jianming (2013). The Comprehensive Study on the Thought of Zongmi, China Renmin University Press.
- Jingyuan (1994). Abridged Manual for Cultivation and Realization of Ritual the Scripture of Perfect Enlighten-ment Bodhimanda. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 129, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Jizheng (1994). Essential Interpretation of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 10, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Jun, 2011, Tangsong yuanjuejing shu zhi yanjiu 唐宋《圆觉经》疏之研究：以华严、天台为中心, History of Chinese Philosophy, 109, 71
- Kai, 2002, Liturgy for Cultivation and Practice of the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment Bodhimanda and Theory of Tiantai School, Buddhist Studies, 36, 82
- Kamata, Shigeo (1975). The Study of the History of Thought in the Teaching of Tsung-mi 宗密教学の思想史的研究, University of Tokyo Press.
- Kuo, 2017, The Interpretation Strategy and Hermeneutic Turn of True Mind Ontology in Zongmi’s “Full Commentary on the Yuanjue jing”, Bulletin of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, 50, 37
- Muller, A. Charles (1999). The Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment: Korean Buddhism’s Guide to Meditation (with Commentary by the Son Monk Kihwa), State University of New York Press.
- Nan, Huaijin (2016). A Brief Introduction to the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment 圓覺經略說, Fudan University Press.
- Qingyuan (1994). The Essentials of the Commentaries and Sub-commentaries of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 10, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Shanxi (1994). Refute the Fallacy. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 103, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Sheng, Huan (2016). Several Questions of the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Selections of the Collected Works of Vast Sea, People’s Publishing House (The Oriental Press).
- Tongrun (1994). Recent Interpretation of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 10, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Tsung-mi (1994). Sub-Commentary on the Full Commentary on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 14, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Xiaozong (1994). Imperial Exegesis on Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 10, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Xingting (1994). Categorized Interpretations of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 15, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Yang, 2016, The New Analysis on the Authenticity of the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment, Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 46, 35
- Yusuki, 1931, A Study on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment, Hai Ch’ao Yin, 24, 52
- Zheng, 2022, From Zongmi’s Divinatory Knowing to Zhu Xi’s Sovereignty of Moral Agency: New Findings and Methodology about the Interaction between Buddhism and Confucianism, The National Chengchi University Philosophical Journal, 47, 1
- Zhicong (1994). Mind Mirror of Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 93, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
- Zhouqi (1994). Lecture Notes of the Interlinear Hymns and Collected Interpretations of Sutra of Per-fect Enlightenment. Manji Zokuzōkyō (Shinwenfeng Edition) 10, Shin Wen Feng Print Co.
Cited by
Chan Aesthetics in Chinese Animation
Peng, C., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Animation · doi:10.1177/17468477251346644 · Cited by 4
“In this way, The Herd Boy’s Flute becomes a visual allegory for Chan enlightenment – achieved not through external conquest but through internal transcendence (Dai and Wang, 2022).”
Inhaling tradition, exhaling innovation: controlled breathing as medicine in Tiantai Buddhism
Chen, D. Y. (2024) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2024.2383510
Recontextualizing Nanyang Buddhism Based on the Guangzhou Guangxiao Si
Miao, Y., Beliatte, M., Liu, Y., & Run, P. (2025) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel16111471
“The Lanka‑ vatara Sutra provides teachings on profound enlightenment that form the foundation of the Chan tradition, which was subsequently adapted to the cultural context of Southeast Asia (K. Wang 2022).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, K.
- Affiliations
- Ocean University of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Kai
- ORCID
- Wang, Kai
- Venue
- Religions
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-11-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1099
- ISSN
- 2077-1444 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309213014
- Semantic Scholar
- d4515e1958b431e01fd13dc9b720d091cf47f212
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Religions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- “2022 Qingdao Social Science Planning and Research Project” and “Rural Revitalization” Research Project of Ocean University of China (中国海洋大学乡村振兴研究专项) (ZX2022005)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- Chinese Buddhist commentaries, Buddhist sutra exegesis, mindfulness meditation, Huayan school, Tiantai Buddhism, Tang dynasty Buddhism, Song dynasty Buddhism, Ming dynasty Buddhism, East Asian Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rel13111099
- The paper
- Wang, K. (2022). A Study of Chinese Commentaries on the Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
