Cited by 3Environmental Science and Water ManagementWater Resource Management and QualityWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies

From Fragmented to Joint Responsibilities: Barriers and Opportunities for Adaptive Water Quality Governance in California’s Urban-Agricultural Interface

Open access
Drevno, Ann·2018·Resources

Abstract

California is facing a critical water supply and water quality crisis, necessitating a clear shift in the way water resources are managed. This study assesses the effectiveness of water law and policy in the urban-agricultural interface, where the two discharge into common waterways but have different regulatory requirements. A case study from one of California’s most productive agricultural regions, the Salinas Valley, explores the complexities and inadequacies of current water law in the interface, as well as promising integrated water management schemes. The article’s findings are based on archival research, extensive document review and 15 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. Findings suggest that local, state and federal water policy is severely fragmented, providing little incentive for the multitude of water entities to collaborate on multi-benefit projects and resulting in unsuccessful water quality improvements. There is a strong need for a more integrated policy approach that bridges different types of dischargers (agricultural and urban), water quality and water quantity issues and also incorporates land uses into policy decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/resources7010022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regulatory exemptions can encourage conflict between upstream agricultural landowners who see urban land use as the main problem and downstream urban communities that argue mitigation should be the responsibility of upstream farm communities that introduced the pollution.

    “Regulatory exemptions can encourage conflict between upstream agricultural landowners who see urban land use as the main problem and downstream urban communities that argue mitigation should be the responsibility of upstream farm communities that introduced the pollution”

    From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Drevno 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Urban stormwater is a source of pollution in need of attention.

    “urban stormwater is a source of pollution in need of attention”
  • In California, urban land use and construction are responsible for impairment of more surface area of lakes than agricultural land use and around 60% the mileage of streams and rivers as agricultural land use.

    “In California, urban land use and construction are responsible for the impairment of more surface area of lakes than agricultural land use and around 60% the mileage of streams and rivers as agricultural land use (Drevno 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Knobeloch, L.; Salna, B.; Hogan, A.; Postle, J.; Anderson, H. Blue babies and nitrate contaminated well water. Environ. Perspect. 2000, 108, 675-678. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andreen, W.L. Water quality today: Has the Clean Water Act Been a Success? Ala. Law Rev. 2004, 55, 537-593.
  3. Anderson, B.S.; Hunt, J.W.; Phillips, B.M.; Nicely, P.A.; Vlaming, V.; Connor, V.; Richard, N.; Tjeerdema, R.S. Integrated assessment of the impacts of agricultural drainwater in the Salinas River. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 124, 523-532. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Anderson, B.S.; Phillips, B.M.; Hunt, J.W.; Connor, W.; Richard, N.; Tjeerdema, R.S. Identifying primary stressors impacting macroinvertebrates in the Salinas River: Relative effects of pesticides and suspended particles. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 141, 402-408. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  5. Pereira, W.; Domagalski, J.; Hostettler, F.; Brown, L.; Rapp, J. Occurrence and accumulation of pesticides and organic contaminants in river sediment, water and clam tissues from the San Joaquin River and tributaries, California. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 172-180. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Paul, M.; Meyer, J. Streams in the urban landscape. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32, 333-365. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  7. Roy, A.H.; Wenger, S.H.; Fletcher, T.D.; Walsh, C.J.; Ladson, A.R.; Shuster, W.D.; Thurston, H.W.; Brown, R.R. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ. Manag. 2008, 42, 344-359. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Otter Project; Monterey Coastkeeper; PCFFA; Environmental Justice Coalition for Water; Santa Barbara Channelkeeper; Sportfishing Protection Alliance. "Judge Rules State Must Do Much More to Curb Agricultural Pollution." (Press Release). Available online: http://mavensnotebook.com/wp-content/ uploads/2015/08/Press-Release-Ag-Order-Win.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2017).
  9. Meurer, F. Letter to the Regional Board Posted in: Transcripts of Proceedings; Meeting minutes; Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board: San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, 2011.
  10. Poteete, A.R. Levels, scales, linkages, and other 'multiples' affecting natural resources. Int. J. Commons. 2012, 6, 134-150. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Adler, R.W.; Straube, M. Watersheds and the Integration of U.S. Water Law and Policy: Bridging the Great Divides; William & Mary Environmental Law Policy Review: Williamsburg, VA, USA, 2010; Volume 25.
  12. Salamon, L.M. The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 1-47.
  13. Drevno, A. Policy Tools for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Control in the U.S. and E.U. J. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2016, 37, 106-123. [CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drevno, A.
Affiliations
Santa Clara University (US)
Corresponding author
Drevno, Ann
Venue
Resources
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-03-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
22
ISSN
2079-9276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794234998
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1749062)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental Science and Water Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Keywords
water quality governance, water law, integrated water resources management, urban discharge, Salinas Valley, water quality improvement, water resources management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review