Cited by 112Smart Agriculture and AIAgricultural Engineering and MechanizationAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Smart Agricultural Machine with a Computer Vision-Based Weeding and Variable-Rate Irrigation Scheme

Open access
Chang, Chung-Liang, Lin, Kuan-Ming·2018·Robotics

Abstract

This paper proposes a scheme that combines computer vision and multi-tasking processes to develop a small-scale smart agricultural machine that can automatically weed and perform variable rate irrigation within a cultivated field. Image processing methods such as HSV (hue (H), saturation (S), value (V)) color conversion, estimation of thresholds during the image binary segmentation process, and morphology operator procedures are used to confirm the position of the plant and weeds, and those results are used to perform weeding and watering operations. Furthermore, the data on the wet distribution area of surface soil (WDAS) and the moisture content of the deep soil is provided to a fuzzy logic controller, which drives pumps to perform variable rate irrigation and to achieve water savings. The proposed system has been implemented in small machines and the experimental results show that the system can classify plant and weeds in real time with an average classification rate of 90% or higher. This allows the machine to do weeding and watering while maintaining the moisture content of the deep soil at 80 ± 10% and an average weeding rate of 90%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/robotics7030038

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The system can classify plants and weeds in real time with an average classification rate of 90% or higher.

    “The system can classify plants and weeds in real time with an average classification rate of 90% or higher.”

    From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [105]

    Section 2.1.1 describes the system’s weed/plant classification method, and Section 3.2 describes real-time observation of crops and weeds. The retrieved main-text passages do not establish an average classification rate of 90% or higher; that figure appears only in the Abstract, which is excluded as evidence under the stated rubric. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This allows the machine to perform weeding and watering while maintaining the moisture content of the deep soil at 80 ± 10% and an average weeding rate of 90%.

    “This allows the machine to perform weeding and watering while maintaining the moisture content of the deep soil at 80 ± 10% and an average weeding rate of 90%.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Sims, B.; Heney, J. Promoting smallholder adoption of conservation agriculture through mechanization services. Agriculture 2017, 7, 64. · DOI
  2. Pullen, D.; Cowell, P. An evaluation of the performance of mechanical weeding mechanisms for use in high speed inter-row weeding of arable crops. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1997, 67, 27-34.
  3. Hemming, J.; Nieuwenhuizen, A.T.; Struik, L.E. Image analysis system to determine crop row and plant positions for an intra-row weeding machine. In Proceedings of the CIGR International Symposium on Sustainable Bioproduction, Tokyo, Japan, 19-23 September 2011; pp. 1-7.
  4. Sims, B.; Heney, J. Promoting smallholder adoption of conservation agriculture through mechanization services. Agriculture 2017, 7, 64. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Pullen, D.; Cowell, P. An evaluation of the performance of mechanical weeding mechanisms for use in high speed inter-row weeding of arable crops. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1997, 67, 27-34. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Hemming, J.; Nieuwenhuizen, A.T.; Struik, L.E. Image analysis system to determine crop row and plant positions for an intra-row weeding machine. In Proceedings of the CIGR International Symposium on Sustainable Bioproduction, Tokyo, Japan, 19-23 September 2011; pp. 1-7.
  7. Burgos-Artizzu, X.; Ribeiro, A.; Guijarro, M.; Pajares, G. Real-time image processing for crop/weed discrimination in maize fields. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2011, 75, 337-346. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Amir, H.; Kargar, B. Automatic weed detection system and smart herbicide sprayer robot for com fields. Int. J. Res. Comput. Commun. Technol. 2013, 2, 55-58.
  9. Choi, K.H.; Han, S.K.; Han, S.H.; Park, K.H.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, S. Morphology-based guidance line extraction for an autonomous weeding robot in pddy fields. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2015, 113, 266-274. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Herrera, P.J.; Dorado, J.; Ribeiro, A. A Novel Approach for Weed Type Classification Based on Shape Descriptors and a Fuzzy Decision-Making Method. Sensors 2014, 14, 15304-15324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  11. Cordill, C.; Grift, T. Design and testing of an intra-row mechanical weeding machine for corn. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 110, 247-252. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Andujar, D.; Weis, M.; Gerhards, R. An ultrasonic system for weed detection in cereal crops. Sensors 2012, 12, 17343-17357. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  13. Perez-Ruiz, M.; Slaughter, D.; Fathallah, F.; Gliever, C.; Miller, B. Co-robotic intra-row weed control system. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 126, 45-55. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Tillett, N.; Hague, T.; Grundy, A.; Dedousis, A. Mechanical within row weed control for transplanted crops using computer vision. Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 99, 171-178. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Gobor, Z. Mechatronic system for mechanical weed control of the intra-row area in row crops. KI-Künstliche Intell. 2013, 27, 379-383. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Langsenkamp, F.; Sellmann, F.; Kohlbrecher, M.; Trautz, D. Tube Stamp for mechanical intra-row individual Plant Weed Control. In Proceedings of the 18th World Congress of CIGR, Beijing, China, 16-19 September 2014.
  17. Blasco, J.; Aleixos, N.; Roger, J.M.; Rabatel, G.; Molto, E. Robotics weed control using machine vision. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 83, 149-157. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Xiong, Y.; Ge, Y.; Liang, Y.; Blackmore, S. Development of a prototype robot and fast path-planning algorithm for static laser weeding. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 142, 494-503. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Bawden, O.; Kulk, J.; Russell, R.; McCool, C.; English, A.; Dayoub, F.; Lehnert, C.; Perez, T. Robot for weed species plant-specific management. J. Field Robot. 2017, 34, 1179-1199. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. McCool, C.; Beattie, J.; Firn, J.; Lehnert, C.; Kulk, J.; Bawden, O.; Russell, R.; Perez, T. Efficacy of mechanical weeding tools: A study into alternative weed management strategies enabled by robotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2018, 3, 1184-1190. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Teixido, M.; Font, D.; Palleja, T.; Tresanchez, M.; Nogues, M.; Palacin, J. Definition of linear color models in the RGB vector color space to detect red peaches in orchard images taken under natural illumination. Sensors 2012, 12, 7701-7718. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  22. Hamuda, E.; Ginley, B.; Glavin, M.; Jones, E. Automatic crop detection under field conditions using the HSV colour space and morphological operations. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 133, 97-107. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Yang, W.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; Feng, J. Greenness identification based on HSV decision tree. Inf. Proc. Agric. 2015, 2, 149-160. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Romeo, J.; Pajares, J.; Montalvo, M.; Guerrero, J.; Guijarro, M. A new expert system for greenness identification in agricultural images. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 2275-2286. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Arroyo, J.; Guijarro, M.; Pajares, G. An instance-based learning approach for thresholding in crop images under different outdoor conditions. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 127, 669-679. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Suh, H.K.; Hofstee, J.W.; Henten, E.J. Improved vegetation segmentation with ground shadow removal using an HDR camera. Precis. Agric. 2018, 19, 218-237. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Keely, M.; Ehn, E.; Patzoldt, W. Smart Machines for Weed Control & Beyond. In Proceedings of the 65th West Texas Agricultural Chemicals Institute Conference, Lubbock, TX, USA, 13 September 2017. Available online: http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/edcenter/seminars/2017AgChemicalsConference/ SmartMachinesWeedControl/SmartMachinesWeedControl.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2018).
  28. Amatya, S.; Karkee, M.; Zhang, Q.; Whiting, M.D. Automated detection of branch shaking locations for robotic cherry harvesting using machine vision. Robotics 2017, 6, 31. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Cubero, S.; Lee, W.S.; Aleixos, N.; Albert, F.; Blasco, J. Automated systems based on machine vision for inspecting citrus fruits from the field to postharvest-A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 1623-1639. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Chang, C.; Lin, K.; Fu, W. An intelligent crop cultivation system based on computer vision with a multiplex switch approach. In Proceedings of the ASABE Annual International Meeting, Spokane, WA, USA, 16-19 July 2017.
  31. Zadeh, L.A. A rationale for fuzzy control. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 1972, 94, 3-4. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Lee, C.C. Fuzzy logic in control system: Fuzzy logic controller. I. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1990, 20, 404-418. [CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, C.-L., & Lin, K.-M.
Affiliations
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Chung-Liang
Venue
Robotics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-07-19
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
38
ISSN
2218-6581 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883454019
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106-2221-E-020-011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
agricultural robotics, variable rate irrigation, computer vision, weed detection, plant detection, foreground-background segmentation, morphological operators, fuzzy logic controller, soil moisture, water saving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review