Cited by 21Calibration and Measurement TechniquesClimate variability and modelsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

A Novel Framework to Harmonise Satellite Data Series for Climate Applications

Open access
Giering, Ralf, Quast, Ralf, Mittaz, Jonathan P. D., Hunt, Samuel E., Harris, Peter M., Woolliams, Emma R., Merchant, Christopher J.·2019·Remote Sensing

Abstract

Fundamental and thematic climate data records derived from satellite observations provide unique information for climate monitoring and research. Since any satellite only operates over a relatively short period of time, creating a climate data record also requires the combination of space-borne measurements from a series of several (often similar) satellite sensors. Simply combining calibrated measurements from several sensors can, however, produce an inconsistent climate data record. This is particularly true of older, historic sensors whose behaviour in space was often different from their behaviour during pre-launch calibration and more scientific value can be derived from considering the series of historical and present satellites as a whole. Here, we consider harmonisation as a process that obtains new calibration coefficients for revised sensor calibration models by comparing calibrated measurements over appropriate satellite-to-satellite matchups, such as simultaneous nadir overpasses and which reconciles the calibration of different sensors given their estimated spectral response function differences. We present the concept of a framework that establishes calibration coefficients and their uncertainty and error covariance for an arbitrary number of sensors in a metrologically-rigorous manner. We describe harmonisation and its mathematical formulation as an inverse problem that is extremely challenging when some hundreds of millions of matchups are involved and the errors of fundamental sensor measurements are correlated. We solve the harmonisation problem as marginalised errors in variables regression. The algorithm involves computation of first and second-order partial derivatives using Algorithmic Differentiation. Finally, we present re-calibrated radiances from a series of nine Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer sensors showing that the new time series has smaller matchup differences compared to the unharmonised case while being consistent with uncertainty statistics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs11091002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Woolliams, E.R.; Mittaz, J.P.D.; Merchant, C.J.; Hunt, S.E.; Harris, P.M. Applying metrological techniques to satellite fundamental climate data records. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 972, 012003. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Mittaz, J.; Merchant, C.J.; Woolliams, E.R. Applying principles of metrology to historical Earth observations from satellites. Metrologia 2019. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Merchant, C.J.; Holl, G.; Mittaz, J.P.D.; Woolliams, E.R. Radiance Uncertainty Characterisation to Facilitate Climate Data Record Creation. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 474. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Merchant, C.J.; Paul, F.; Popp, T.; Ablain, M.; Bontemps, S.; Defourny, P.; Hollmann, R.; Lavergne, T.; Laeng, A.; de Leeuw, G.; et al. Uncertainty information in climate data records from Earth observation. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2017, 9, 511-527. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chander, G.; Hewison, T.J.; Fox, N.P.; Wu, X.; Xiong, X.; Blackwell, W.J. Overview of intercalibration of satellite instruments. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 51, 1056-1080. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Newey, W.K. Flexible simulated moment estimation of nonlinear errors-in-variables models. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2001, 83, 616-627. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Zwolak, J.W.; Boggs, P.T.; Watson, L.T. Algorithm 869: ODRPACK95: A weighted orthogonal distance regression code with bound constraints. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 2007, 33, 27. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Hunt, S.E.; Quast, R.; Harris, P.M.; Mittaz, J.P.D.; Woolliams, E.R.; Giering, R.; Dilo, A.; Merchant, C.J. A metrological approach to producing harmonised fundamental climate data records from long-term sensor series data. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, Spain, 22-27 July 2018; pp. 3397-3400,
  9. Liu, D.C.; Nocedal, J. On the limited-memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math. Program. 1989, 45, 503-528. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Zhu, C.; Byrd, R.H.; Lu, P.; Nocedal, J. Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 1997, 23, 550-560. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Morales, J.L.; Nocedal, J. Remark on Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran Subroutines for Large-scale Bound Constrained Optimization. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 2011, 38, 7:1-7:4. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Giering, R.; Kaminski, T. Recipes for Adjoint Code Construction. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 1998, 24, 437-474. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Giering, R.; Kaminski, T. Applying TAF to generate efficient derivative code of Fortran 77-95 programs. In PAMM: Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics; WILEY-VCH: Berlin, Germany, 2002.
  14. Corliss, G., Faure, C., Griewank, A., Hascoët, L., Naumann, U., Eds.; Computer and Information Science; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; Chapter 33, pp. 283-291.
  15. Giering, R.; Kaminski, T.; Slawig, T. Generating efficient derivative code with TAF. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2005, 21, 1345-1355. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Giering, R.; Voßbeck, M. Increasing memory locality by executing several model instances simultaneously. In Recent Advances in Algorithmic Differentiation; Forth, S., Hovland, P., Phipps, E., Utke, J., Walther, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 93-101.
  17. Smith, D.; Mutlow, C.; Delderfield, J.; Watkins, B.; Mason, G. ATSR infrared radiometric calibration and in-orbit performance. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 116, 4-16. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Block, T.; Embacher, S.; Merchant, C.J.; Donlon, C. High-performance software framework for the calculation of satellite-to-satellite data matchups (MMS version 1.2). Geosci. Model Dev. 2018, 11, 2419-2427. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Wu, W.; Hewison, T.; Tahara, Y. GSICS GEO-LEO inter-calibration: Baseline algorithm and early results. In Atmospheric and Environmental Remote Sensing Data Processing and Utilization V: Readiness for GEOSS III; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volume 7456, pp. 745604-1-745604-12.

Authors
Giering, R., Quast, R., Mittaz, J. P. D., Hunt, S. E., Harris, P. M., Woolliams, E. R., & Merchant, C. J.
Affiliations
  • FastOpt (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • National Physical Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
Giering, Ralf
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-04-27
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1002
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766971143
Cited by
21
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • EGUGA
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
Horizon 2020 (638822)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
sensor calibration, climate data record, spectral response function, calibration factor, error covariance, automatic differentiation, AVHRR, inverse problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review