Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 884

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Copernicus Global Land Cover Layers—Collection 2

Open access
Buchhorn, Marcel, Lesiv, Myroslava, Tsendbazar, Nandin-Erdene, Herold, Martin, Bertels, Luc, Smets, Bruno·2020·Remote Sensing
DOI 10.3390/rs12061044
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In May 2019, Collection 2 of the Copernicus Global Land Cover layers was released. Next to a global discrete land cover map at 100 m resolution, a set of cover fraction layers is provided depicting the percentual cover of the main land cover types in a pixel. This additional continuous classification scheme represents areas of heterogeneous land cover better than the standard discrete classification scheme. Overall, 20 layers are provided which allow customization of land cover maps to specific user needs or applications (e.g., forest monitoring, crop monitoring, biodiversity and conservation, climate modeling, etc.). However, Collection 2 was not just a global up-scaling, but also includes major improvements in the map quality, reaching around 80% or more overall accuracy. The processing system went into operational status allowing annual updates on a global scale with an additional implemented training and validation data collection system. In this paper, we provide an overview of the major changes in the production of the land cover maps, that have led to this increased accuracy, including aligning with the Sentinel 2 satellite system in the grid and coordinate system, improving the metric extraction, adding better auxiliary data, improving the biome delineations, as well as enhancing the expert rules. An independent validation exercise confirmed the improved classification results. In addition to the methodological improvements, this paper also provides an overview of where the different resources can be found, including access channels to the product layer as well as the detailed peer-review product documentation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs12061044

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Tesfaw, 2018, Land-use and land-cover change shape the sustainability and impacts of protected areas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 2084, 10.1073/pnas.1716462115 · DOI
  2. Fensholt, 2013, Assessing Land Degradation/Recovery in the African Sahel from Long-Term Earth Observation Based Primary Productivity and Precipitation Relationships, Remote Sens., 5, 664, 10.3390/rs5020664 · DOI
  3. Pedelty, J., Devadiga, S., Masuoka, E., Brown, M., Pinzon, J., Tucker, C., Roy, D., Ju, J.C., Vermote, E., and Prince, S. (2007). Generating a Long-term Land Data Record from the AVHRR and MODIS instruments. Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., 1021–1024. · DOI
  4. Ju, 2016, The vegetation greenness trend in Canada and US Alaska from 1984–2012 Landsat data, Remote Sens. Environ., 176, 1, 10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Vogelmann, 2016, Perspectives on monitoring gradual change across the continuity of Landsat sensors using time-series data, Remote Sens. Environ., 185, 258, 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.060 · DOI
  6. Congalton, 2014, Global Land Cover Mapping: A Review and Uncertainty Analysis, Remote Sens., 6, 12070, 10.3390/rs61212070 · DOI
  7. Grekousis, 2015, An overview of 21 global and 43 regional land-cover mapping products, Int. J. Remote Sens., 36, 5309, 10.1080/01431161.2015.1093195 · DOI
  8. Arino, O., Gross, D., Ranera, F., Leroy, M., Bicheron, P., Brockman, C., Defourny, P., Vancutsem, C., Achard, F., and Durieux, L. (2007). GlobCover ESA service for Global land cover from MERIS. Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gray, 2019, Hierarchical mapping of annual global land cover 2001 to present: The MODIS Collection 6 Land Cover product, Remote Sens. Environ., 222, 183, 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.013 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gong, 2013, Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: First mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 2607, 10.1080/01431161.2012.748992 · DOI
  11. Wulder, 2018, Land cover 2.0, Int. J. Remote Sens., 39, 4254, 10.1080/01431161.2018.1452075 · DOI
  12. Francois, 2014, The PROBA-V mission: The space segment, Int. J. Remote Sens., 35, 2548, 10.1080/01431161.2014.883098 · DOI
  13. Dierckx, W., Sterckx, S., Benhadj, I., Livens, S., Duhoux, G., Van Achteren, T., Francois, M., Mellab, K., and Saint, G. (2016). PROBA-V mission for global vegetation monitoring: Standard products and image quality (vol 35, pg 2589, 2014). Int. J. Remote Sens., 37. · DOI
  14. Zhai, Y.G., Qu, Z.Y., and Hao, L. (2018). Land Cover Classification Using Integrated Spectral, Temporal, and Spatial Features Derived from Remotely Sensed Images. Remote Sens., 10. · DOI
  15. Eberenz, J., Verbesselt, J., Herold, M., Tsendbazar, N.E., Sabatino, G., and Rivolta, G. (2016). Evaluating the Potential of PROBA-V Satellite Image Time Series for Improving LC Classification in Semi-Arid African Landscapes. Remote Sens., 8. · DOI
  16. Tsendbazar, 2018, Developing and applying a multi-purpose land cover validation dataset for Africa, Remote Sens. Environ., 219, 298, 10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.025 · DOI
  17. Nabil, M., Zhang, M., Bofana, J., Wu, B., Stein, A., Dong, T., Zeng, H., and Shang, J. (2020). Assessing factors impacting the spatial discrepancy of remote sensing based cropland products: A case study in Africa. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 85. · DOI
  18. Xu, 2019, Comparisons of three recent moderate resolution African land cover datasets: CGLS-LC100, ESA-S2-LC20, and FROM-GLC-Africa30, Int. J. Remote Sens., 40, 6185, 10.1080/01431161.2019.1587207 · DOI
  19. Pérez-Hoyos, A., Udías, A., and Rembold, F. (2020). Integrating multiple land cover maps through a multi-criteria analysis to improve agricultural monitoring in Africa. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 88. · DOI
  20. Roy, 2016, Best practices for the reprojection and resampling of Sentinel-2 Multi Spectral Instrument Level 1C data, Remote Sens. Lett., 7, 1023, 10.1080/2150704X.2016.1212419 · DOI
  21. Dwyer, J.L., Roy, D.P., Sauer, B., Jenkerson, C.B., Zhang, H.K.K., and Lymburner, L. (2018). Analysis Ready Data: Enabling Analysis of the Landsat Archive. Remote Sens., 10. · DOI
  22. Roerink, 2000, Reconstructing cloudfree NDVI composites using Fourier analysis of time series, Int. J. Remote Sens., 21, 1911, 10.1080/014311600209814 · DOI
  23. Walker, H.M. (1929). Studies in the History of Statistical Method: With Special Reference to Certain Educational Problems. Williams & Wilkins Co. · DOI
  24. Azzali, 1996, Application of Harmonic Analysis of NDVI Time Series (HANTS), Fourier Analysis of Temporal NDVI in the Southern African and American Continents, Volume 108, 19
  25. Sedano, 2014, A Kalman filter-based method to generate continuous time series of medium-resolution NDVI images, Remote Sens., 6, 12381, 10.3390/rs61212381 · DOI
  26. Kempeneers, 2016, Data Assimilation of PROBA-V 100 and 300 m, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 9, 3314, 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2527922 · DOI
  27. Marconcini, M., Metz-Marconcini, A., Üreyen, S., Palacios-Lopez, D., Hanke, W., Bachofer, F., Zeidler, J., Esch, T., Gorelick, N., and Kakarla, A. (2019). Outlining where humans live—The World Settlement Footprint 2015. arXiv. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Fritz, 2012, Geo-Wiki: An online platform for improving global land cover, Environ. Modell. Softw., 31, 110, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.015 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tsendbazar, 2016, Comparative assessment of thematic accuracy of GLC maps for specific applications using existing reference data, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 44, 124

Cited by

See all 884

Metadata

Authors
Buchhorn, M., Lesiv, M., Tsendbazar, N.-E., Herold, M., Bertels, L., & Smets, B.
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-03-24
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1044
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/rs12061044
OpenAlex
W3013341479
Cited by
884
References
2
FWCI
61.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.