An Analytical Framework for Accurate Traffic Flow Parameter Calculation from UAV Aerial Videos
Open accessAbstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) represent easy, affordable, and simple solutions for many tasks, including the collection of traffic data. The main aim of this study is to propose a new, low-cost framework for the determination of highly accurate traffic flow parameters. The proposed framework consists of four segments: terrain survey, image processing, vehicle detection, and collection of traffic flow parameters. The testing phase of the framework was done on the Zagreb bypass motorway. A significant part of this study is the integration of the state-of-the-art pre-trained Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN) for vehicle detection. Moreover, the study includes detailed explanations about vehicle speed estimation based on the calculation of the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Faster R-CNN was pre-trained on Common Objects in COntext (COCO) images dataset, fine-tuned on 160 images, and tested on 40 images. A dual-frequency Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver was used for the determination of spatial resolution. This approach to data collection enables extraction of trajectories for an individual vehicle, which consequently provides a method for microscopic traffic flow parameters in detail analysis. As an example, the trajectories of two vehicles were extracted and the comparison of the driver’s behavior was given by speed—time, speed—space, and space—time diagrams.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CSRT was employed in [92] due to its ability to achieve high accuracy with respect to MOSSE.
“Furthermore, in order to track the vehicles with a moving UAV, [92] used DCF filter with Channel and Spatial Reliability Tracking (CSRT), where CSRT was employed due to its ability to achieve high accuracy with respect to MOSSE.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [92]
As demonstrated in [92], while estimating vehicle speed in video captured with both static and moving UAV, frame rate decreases as the number of vehicles increases, and vice versa.
“As demonstrated in [92], while estimating the speed of vehicles in video captured with both static and moving UAV, the frame rate decreases as the number of vehicles increases, and vice versa.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [92]
The Faster R-CNN with CNN achieves an F1 score of 96.60% on a custom dataset.
“[92] Faster R-CNN | CNN | Custom | 4k video (optical camera) | -- | Static and moving UAV states | Two classes (Small & Large vehicles) | -- | 96.60 | 93.46 | --”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [92]
The Faster R-CNN with CNN achieves an accuracy of 93.46% on a custom dataset.
“[92] Faster R-CNN | CNN | Custom | 4k video (optical camera) | -- | Static and moving UAV states | Two classes (Small & Large vehicles) | -- | 96.60 | 93.46 | --”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [92]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey
Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., & Pietikäinen, M. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 · Cited by 2,965 · see citing works
Traffic flow estimation with data from a video surveillance camera
Fedorov, A., Nikolskaia, K., Ivanov, S., Shepelev, V., & Minbaleev, A. (2019) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0234-z · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System
Bisio, I., Garibotto, C., Haleem, H., Lavagetto, F., & Sciarrone, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207282 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
“Due to instability of recorded video, image alignment tech-813 niques (feature descriptors, homography between images) were employed in [92].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Brkić, I., Miler, M., Ševrović, M., & Medak, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Zagreb (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Brkić, Ivan
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-11-23
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3844
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3110532956
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (HRZZ-IP-2016-06-5621)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- traffic flow parameters, vehicle detection, Faster R-CNN, vehicle speed estimation, vehicle trajectory extraction, topographic survey, traffic data collection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review