The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Literature Review on Crop Yield Prediction with Deep Learning and Remote Sensing
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning has emerged as a potential tool for crop yield prediction, allowing the model to automatically extract features and learn from the datasets. Meanwhile, smart farming technology enables the farmers to achieve maximum crop yield by extracting essential parameters of crop growth. This systematic literature review highlights the existing research gaps in a particular area of deep learning methodologies and guides us in analyzing the impact of vegetation indices and environmental factors on crop yield. To achieve the aims of this study, prior studies from 2012 to 2022 from various databases are collected and analyzed. The study focuses on the advantages of using deep learning in crop yield prediction, the suitable remote sensing technology based on the data acquisition requirements, and the various features that influence crop yield prediction. This study finds that Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) are the most widely used deep learning approaches for crop yield prediction. The commonly used remote sensing technology is satellite remote sensing technology—in particular, the use of the Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Findings show that vegetation indices are the most used feature for crop yield prediction. However, it is also observed that the most used features in the literature do not always work for all the approaches. The main challenges of using deep learning approaches and remote sensing for crop yield prediction are how to improve the working model for better accuracy, the practical implication of the model for providing accurate information about crop yield to agriculturalists, growers, and policymakers, and the issue with the black box property.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 · Cited by 11,748
Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology
Yamashita, R., Nishio, M., Do, R. K. G., & Togashi, K. (2018) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9 · Cited by 4,682 · cited 2×
“Moreover, a pooling operation is used to perform down-sampling as it helps to detect features effectively [19].”
MethodSarker, I. H. (2021) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1 · Cited by 2,678
A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003 · Cited by 1,644
Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics
Thenkabail, P. S., Smith, R. B., & De Pauw, E. (2000) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(99)00067-x · Cited by 1,313
Shen, C. (2018) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2018wr022643 · Cited by 1,133
Soybean yield prediction from UAV using multimodal data fusion and deep learning
Maimaitijiang, M., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Hartling, S., Esposito, F., & Fritschi, F. B. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111599 · Cited by 971
Metadata
- Authors
- Muruganantham, P., Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S., Samrat, N. H., & Islam, N.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-04-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1990
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224308360
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Literature Review on Crop Yield Prediction with Deep Learning and Remote Sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs14091990
- The paper
- Muruganantham, P., Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S., Samrat, N. H., & Islam, N. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review on Crop Yield Prediction with Deep Learning and Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14091990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.