The DOI matches its Crossref record; 141 of the 141 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UAV-Based Forest Health Monitoring: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, technological advances have led to the increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for forestry applications. One emerging field for drone application is forest health monitoring (FHM). Common approaches for FHM involve small-scale resource-extensive fieldwork combined with traditional remote sensing platforms. However, the highly dynamic nature of forests requires timely and repetitive data acquisition, often at very high spatial resolution, where conventional remote sensing techniques reach the limits of feasibility. UAVs have shown that they can meet the demands of flexible operation and high spatial resolution. This is also reflected in a rapidly growing number of publications using drones to study forest health. Only a few reviews exist which do not cover the whole research history of UAV-based FHM. Since a comprehensive review is becoming critical to identify research gaps, trends, and drawbacks, we offer a systematic analysis of 99 papers covering the last ten years of research related to UAV-based monitoring of forests threatened by biotic and abiotic stressors. Advances in drone technology are being rapidly adopted and put into practice, further improving the economical use of UAVs. Despite the many advantages of UAVs, such as their flexibility, relatively low costs, and the possibility to fly below cloud cover, we also identified some shortcomings: (1) multitemporal and long-term monitoring of forests is clearly underrepresented; (2) the rare use of hyperspectral and LiDAR sensors must drastically increase; (3) complementary data from other RS sources are not sufficiently being exploited; (4) a lack of standardized workflows poses a problem to ensure data uniformity; (5) complex machine learning algorithms and workflows obscure interpretability and hinders widespread adoption; (6) the data pipeline from acquisition to final analysis often relies on commercial software at the expense of open-source tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object based image analysis for remote sensing
Blaschke, T. (2010) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004 · Cited by 4,482
Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information
Hirschmuller, H. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1166 · Cited by 4,195
Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review
Colomina, I., & Molina, P. (2014) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013 · Cited by 2,954
Forest disturbances under climate change
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M., Honkaniemi, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3303 · Cited by 2,878
Climate Change and Forest Disturbances
DALE, V. H., JOYCE, L. A., MCNULTY, S., NEILSON, R. P., AYRES, M. P., FLANNIGAN, M. D., HANSON, P. J., IRLAND, L. C., LUGO, A. E., PETERSON, C. J., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:ccafd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,240
A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency
Gamon, J. A., Peñuelas, J., & Field, C. B. (1992) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(92)90059-s · Cited by 2,184
UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review
Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014) · Applied Geomatics · doi:10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x · Cited by 1,878
Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing
Kattenborn, T., Leitloff, J., Schiefer, F., & Hinz, S. (2021) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.12.010 · Cited by 1,805
Tanks and temples: benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction
Knapitsch, A., Park, J., Zhou, Q.-Y., & Koltun, V. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3072959.3073599 · Cited by 1,707
Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology
Anderson, K., & Gaston, K. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/120150 · Cited by 1,397
Cited by
A Comprehensive Review of Recent Research Trends on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
Telli, K., Kraa, O., Himeur, Y., Ouamane, A., Boumehraz, M., Atalla, S., & Mansoor, W. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11080400 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Ecke, S., Dempewolf, J., Frey, J., Schwaller, A., Endres, E., Klemmt, H.-J., Tiede, D., & Seifert, T.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-07-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3205
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4283822762
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 141
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UAV-Based Forest Health Monitoring: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs14133205
- The paper
- Ecke, S., Dempewolf, J., Frey, J., Schwaller, A., Endres, E., Klemmt, H.-J., Tiede, D., & Seifert, T. (2022). UAV-Based Forest Health Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.