The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote Sensing for Landslide Investigations: An Overview of Recent Achievements and Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Landslides represent major natural hazards, which cause every year significant loss of lives and damages to buildings, properties and lifelines. In the last decades, a significant increase in landslide frequency took place, in concomitance to climate change and the expansion of urbanized areas. Remote sensing techniques represent a powerful tool for landslide investigation: applications are traditionally divided into three main classes, although this subdivision has some limitations and borders are sometimes fuzzy. The first class comprehends techniques for landslide recognition, i.e., the mapping of past or active slope failures. The second regards landslide monitoring, which entails both ground deformation measurement and the analysis of any other changes along time (e.g., land use, vegetation cover). The third class groups methods for landslide hazard analysis and forecasting. The aim of this paper is to give an overview on the applications of remote-sensing techniques for the three categories of landslide investigations, focusing on the achievements of the last decade, being that previous studies have already been exhaustively reviewed in the existing literature. At the end of the paper, a new classification of remote-sensing techniques that may be pertinently adopted for investigating specific typologies of soil and rock slope failures is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation
Wright, J., Lillesand, T. M., & Kiefer, R. W. (1980) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/634969 · Cited by 7,238
Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R., et al. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2002.803792 · Cited by 5,331
Object based image analysis for remote sensing
Blaschke, T. (2010) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004 · Cited by 4,482
Remote Sensing And Image Interpretation
LILLESAND, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. (1979) · HAL · Cited by 4,463
The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update
Hungr, O., Leroueil, S., & Picarelli, L. (2014) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-013-0436-y · Cited by 3,467
Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review
Colomina, I., & Molina, P. (2014) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013 · Cited by 2,954
A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow
Baker, S., Scharstein, D., Lewis, J. P., Roth, S., Black, M. J., & Szeliski, R. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0390-2 · Cited by 2,205 · cited 1×
“One technique that has been successfully applied is digital image correlation (DIC) or optical-flow tracking [139], which may provide 2D displacements on the topographic surface on the basis of a single sequence of images.”
MethodLandslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem
Guzzetti, F., Mondini, A. C., Cardinali, M., Fiorucci, F., Santangelo, M., & Chang, K.-T. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,092
Ayalew, L., & Yamagishi, H. (2005) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010 · Cited by 1,913
UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review
Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014) · Applied Geomatics · doi:10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x · Cited by 1,878
Cited by
Landslide failures detection and mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar: Past, present and future
Mondini, A. C., Guzzetti, F., Chang, K.-T., Monserrat, O., Martha, T. R., & Manconi, A. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103574 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Scaioni, M., Longoni, L., Melillo, V., & Papini, M.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-10-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 9600-9652
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970331803
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 68.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote Sensing for Landslide Investigations: An Overview of Recent Achievements and Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs6109600
- The paper
- Scaioni, M., Longoni, L., Melillo, V., & Papini, M. (2014). Remote Sensing for Landslide Investigations: An Overview of Recent Achievements and Perspectives. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6109600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.