Cited by 31Soil Moisture and Remote SensingSoil Geostatistics and MappingSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques

Statistical Modeling of Soil Moisture, Integrating Satellite Remote-Sensing (SAR) and Ground-Based Data

Open access
Hosseini, Reza, Newlands, Nathaniel, Dean, Charmaine, Takemura, Akimichi·2015·Remote Sensing

Abstract

We present a flexible, integrated statistical-based modeling approach to improve the robustness of soil moisture data predictions. We apply this approach in exploring the consequence of different choices of leading predictors and covariates. Competing models, predictors, covariates and changing spatial correlation are often ignored in empirical analyses and validation studies. An optimal choice of model and predictors may, however, provide a more consistent and reliable explanation of the high environmental variability and stochasticity of soil moisture observational data. We integrate active polarimetric satellite remote-sensing data (RADARSAT-2, C-band) with ground-based in-situ data across an agricultural monitoring site in Canada. We apply a grouped step-wise algorithm to iteratively select best-performing predictors of soil moisture. Integrated modeling approaches may better account for observed uncertainty and be tuned to different applications that vary in scale and scope, while also providing greater insights into spatial scaling (upscaling and downscaling) of soil moisture variability from the field- to regional scale. We discuss several methodological extensions and data requirements to enable further statistical modeling and validation for improved agricultural decision-support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs70302752

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A.; Beware of Q 2 . J. Molec. Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 269-276.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosseini, R., Newlands, N., Dean, C., & Takemura, A.
Affiliations
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
Corresponding author
Newlands, Nathaniel
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
2752-2780
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007231592
Cited by
31
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Keywords
soil moisture prediction, polarimetric SAR, RADARSAT-2, C-band radar, predictor selection, spatial correlation, upscaling and downscaling, soil moisture variability, agricultural monitoring, agricultural decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review