The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Throughput Field Phenotyping of Wheat Plant Height and Growth Rate in Field Plot Trials Using UAV Based Remote Sensing
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing need to increase global crop yields, whilst minimising use of resources such as land, fertilisers and water. Agricultural researchers use ground-based observations to identify, select and develop crops with favourable genotypes and phenotypes; however, the ability to collect rapid, high quality and high volume phenotypic data in open fields is restricting this. This study develops and assesses a method for deriving crop height and growth rate rapidly from multi-temporal, very high spatial resolution (1 cm/pixel), 3D digital surface models of crop field trials produced via Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry using aerial imagery collected through repeated campaigns flying an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with a mounted Red Green Blue (RGB) camera. We compare UAV SfM modelled crop heights to those derived from terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and to the standard field measurement of crop height conducted using a 2 m rule. The most accurate UAV-derived surface model and the TLS both achieve a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.03 m compared to the existing manual 2 m rule method. The optimised UAV method was then applied to the growing season of a winter wheat field phenotyping experiment containing 25 different varieties grown in 27 m2 plots and subject to four different nitrogen fertiliser treatments. Accuracy assessments at different stages of crop growth produced consistently low RMSE values (0.07, 0.02 and 0.03 m for May, June and July, respectively), enabling crop growth rate to be derived from differencing of the multi-temporal surface models. We find growth rates range from −13 mm/day to 17 mm/day. Our results clearly display the impact of variable nitrogen fertiliser rates on crop growth. Digital surface models produced provide a novel spatial mapping of crop height variation both at the field scale and also within individual plots. This study proves UAV based SfM has the potential to become a new standard for high-throughput phenotyping of in-field crop heights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals
ZADOKS, J. C., CHANG, T. T., & KONZAK, C. F. (1974) · Weed Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x · Cited by 10,173
New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Poorter, H., Jaureguiberry, P., Bret-Harte, M. S., Cornwell, W. K., Craine, J. M., Gurvich, D. E., et al. (2013) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt12225 · Cited by 4,240
A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Cornelissen, J. H. C., Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., Díaz, S., Buchmann, N., Gurvich, D. E., Reich, P. B., Steege, H. T., Morgan, H. D., Heijden, M. G. A. V. D., et al. (2003) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt02124 · Cited by 4,079
‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications
Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., & Reynolds, J. M. (2012) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021 · Cited by 4,044
UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review
Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014) · Applied Geomatics · doi:10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x · Cited by 1,878
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817 · cited 1×
“Current phenotyping techniques particularly the capacity to collect quality repeatable phenotypic data in field representative growing conditions is a bottleneck for further advancements in knowledge and development of crop varieties and yield gains [8].”
BackgroundBerni, J., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Suarez, L., & Fereres, E. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2008.2010457 · Cited by 1,308
Bendig, J., Yu, K., Aasen, H., Bolten, A., Bennertz, S., Broscheit, J., Gnyp, M. L., & Bareth, G. (2015) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.02.012 · Cited by 1,196
Turner, D., Lucieer, A., & Watson, C. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4051392 · Cited by 744
Dawn of Drone Ecology: Low-Cost Autonomous Aerial Vehicles for Conservation
Koh, L. P., & Wich, S. A. (2012) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/194008291200500202 · Cited by 732
Cited by
Uncovering the hidden half of plants using new advances in root phenotyping
Atkinson, J. A., Pound, M. P., Bennett, M. J., & Wells, D. M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2018.06.002 · Cited by 406
Barbedo, J. (2019) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones3020040 · Cited by 391
New strategies on the application of artificial intelligence in the field of phytoremediation
Singh, P., Pani, A., Mujumdar, A. S., & Shirkole, S. S. (2023) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2022.2090500 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Holman, F., Riche, A., Michalski, A., Castle, M., Wooster, M., & Hawkesford, M.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-12-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1031
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2565531507
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 28.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Throughput Field Phenotyping of Wheat Plant Height and Growth Rate in Field Plot Trials Using UAV Based Remote Sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs8121031
- The paper
- Holman, F., Riche, A., Michalski, A., Castle, M., Wooster, M., & Hawkesford, M. (2016). High Throughput Field Phenotyping of Wheat Plant Height and Growth Rate in Field Plot Trials Using UAV Based Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.