The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Trust Evaluation Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Node Behaviors and D-S Evidence Theory
Open accessAbstract
For wireless sensor networks (WSNs), many factors, such as mutual interference of wireless links, battlefield applications and nodes exposed to the environment without good physical protection, result in the sensor nodes being more vulnerable to be attacked and compromised. In order to address this network security problem, a novel trust evaluation algorithm defined as NBBTE (Node Behavioral Strategies Banding Belief Theory of the Trust Evaluation Algorithm) is proposed, which integrates the approach of nodes behavioral strategies and modified evidence theory. According to the behaviors of sensor nodes, a variety of trust factors and coefficients related to the network application are established to obtain direct and indirect trust values through calculating weighted average of trust factors. Meanwhile, the fuzzy set method is applied to form the basic input vector of evidence. On this basis, the evidence difference is calculated between the indirect and direct trust values, which link the revised D-S evidence combination rule to finally synthesize integrated trust value of nodes. The simulation results show that NBBTE can effectively identify malicious nodes and reflects the characteristic of trust value that ‘hard to acquire and easy to lose’. Furthermore, it is obvious that the proposed scheme has an outstanding advantage in terms of illustrating the real contribution of different nodes to trust evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey
Syed, N. F., Shah, S. W., Shaghaghi, A., Anwar, A., Baig, Z., & Doss, R. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3174679 · Cited by 406
An Efficient Distributed Trust Model for Wireless Sensor Networks
Jiang, J., Han, G., Wang, F., Shu, L., & Guizani, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2014.2320505 · Cited by 287
A survey on trust evaluation based on machine learning
Wang, J., Jing, X., Yan, Z., Fu, Y., Pedrycz, W., & Yang, L. T. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3408292 · Cited by 136
A synergetic trust model based on SVM in underwater acoustic sensor networks
Han, G., He, Y., Jiang, J., Wang, N., Guizani, M., & Ansere, J. A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2939179 · Cited by 106
Rani, R., Kumar, S., & Dohare, U. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2917763 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, R., Xu, X., Zhou, X., & Wan, J.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2011-01-25
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1345-1360
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127826640
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Trust Evaluation Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Node Behaviors and D-S Evidence Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s110201345
- The paper
- Feng, R., Xu, X., Zhou, X., & Wan, J. (2011). A Trust Evaluation Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Node Behaviors and D-S Evidence Theory. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110201345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.