The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design, Fabrication and Experimental Validation of a Novel Dry-Contact Sensor for Measuring Electroencephalography Signals without Skin Preparation
Open accessAbstract
In the present study, novel dry-contact sensors for measuring electro-encephalography (EEG) signals without any skin preparation are designed, fabricated by an injection molding manufacturing process and experimentally validated. Conventional wet electrodes are commonly used to measure EEG signals; they provide excellent EEG signals subject to proper skin preparation and conductive gel application. However, a series of skin preparation procedures for applying the wet electrodes is always required and usually creates trouble for users. To overcome these drawbacks, novel dry-contact EEG sensors were proposed for potential operation in the presence or absence of hair and without any skin preparation or conductive gel usage. The dry EEG sensors were designed to contact the scalp surface with 17 spring contact probes. Each probe was designed to include a probe head, plunger, spring, and barrel. The 17 probes were inserted into a flexible substrate using a one-time forming process via an established injection molding procedure. With these 17 spring contact probes, the flexible substrate allows for high geometric conformity between the sensor and the irregular scalp surface to maintain low skin-sensor interface impedance. Additionally, the flexible substrate also initiates a sensor buffer effect, eliminating pain when force is applied. The proposed dry EEG sensor was reliable in measuring EEG signals without any skin preparation or conductive gel usage, as compared with the conventional wet electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Novel dry electrodes for ECG monitoring
Gruetzmann, A., Hansen, S., & Müller, J. (2007) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/28/11/005 · Cited by 248
Cited by
Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans
Gramann, K., Gwin, J. T., Ferris, D. P., Oie, K., Jung, T.-P., Lin, C.-T., Liao, L.-D., & Makeig, S. (2011) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/rns.2011.047 · Cited by 302
Self-citationWearable, Wireless EEG Solutions in Daily Life Applications: What are we Missing?
Mihajlovic, V., Grundlehner, B., Vullers, R., & Penders, J. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2014.2328317 · Cited by 289
Capacitive Epidermal Electronics for Electrically Safe, Long‐Term Electrophysiological Measurements
Jeong, J., Kim, M. K., Cheng, H., Yeo, W., Huang, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., & Rogers, J. A. (2014) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201300334 · Cited by 288
Sun, W., Guo, Z., Yang, Z., Wu, Y., Lan, W., Liao, Y., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22207784 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Liao, L.-D., Wang, I.-J., Chen, S.-F., Chang, J.-Y., & Lin, C.-T.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2011-05-30
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5819-5834
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976402566
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design, Fabrication and Experimental Validation of a Novel Dry-Contact Sensor for Measuring Electroencephalography Signals without Skin Preparation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s110605819
- The paper
- Liao, L.-D., Wang, I.-J., Chen, S.-F., Chang, J.-Y., & Lin, C.-T. (2011). Design, Fabrication and Experimental Validation of a Novel Dry-Contact Sensor for Measuring Electroencephalography Signals without Skin Preparation. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110605819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.