The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this investigation was to develop and investigate methods for point cloud generation by image matching using aerial image data collected by quadrocopter type micro unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging systems. Automatic generation of high-quality, dense point clouds from digital images by image matching is a recent, cutting-edge step forward in digital photogrammetric technology. The major components of the system for point cloud generation are a UAV imaging system, an image data collection process using high image overlaps, and post-processing with image orientation and point cloud generation. Two post-processing approaches were developed: one of the methods is based on Bae Systems’ SOCET SET classical commercial photogrammetric software and another is built using Microsoft®’s Photosynth™ service available in the Internet. Empirical testing was carried out in two test areas. Photosynth processing showed that it is possible to orient the images and generate point clouds fully automatically without any a priori orientation information or interactive work. The photogrammetric processing line provided dense and accurate point clouds that followed the theoretical principles of photogrammetry, but also some artifacts were detected. The point clouds from the Photosynth processing were sparser and noisier, which is to a large extent due to the fact that the method is not optimized for dense point cloud generation. Careful photogrammetric processing with self-calibration is required to achieve the highest accuracy. Our results demonstrate the high performance potential of the approach and that with rigorous processing it is possible to reach results that are consistent with theory. We also point out several further research topics. Based on theoretical and empirical results, we give recommendations for properties of imaging sensor, data collection and processing of UAV image data to ensure accurate point cloud generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features
Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_32 · Cited by 14,955
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557
Berni, J., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Suarez, L., & Fereres, E. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2008.2010457 · Cited by 1,308
Advances in computational stereo
Brown, M. Z., Burschka, D., & Hager, G. D. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1217603 · Cited by 1,132
Agarwal, S., Snavely, N., Simon, I., Seitz, S. M., & Szeliski, R. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459148 · Cited by 1,067
Digital camera self-calibration
Fraser, C. S. (1997) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(97)00005-1 · Cited by 595
Cooperative forest fire surveillance using a team of small unmanned air vehicles
Casbeer, D. W., Kingston, D. B., Beard, R. W., & McLain, T. W. (2006) · International Journal of Systems Science · doi:10.1080/00207720500438480 · Cited by 532
Acquisition of NIR-Green-Blue Digital Photographs from Unmanned Aircraft for Crop Monitoring
Hunt, E. R., Hively, W. D., Fujikawa, S. J., Linden, D. S., Daughtry, C. S. T., & McCarty, G. W. (2010) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs2010290 · Cited by 488
Lelong, C. C. D., Burger, P., Jubelin, G., Roux, B., Labbé, S., & Baret, F. (2008) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s8053557 · Cited by 408
Cited by
James, M. R., & Robson, S. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2011jf002289 · Cited by 1,116
Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography
Smith, M. W., Carrivick, J. L., & Quincey, D. J. (2016) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133315615805 · Cited by 772
Mancini, F., Dubbini, M., Gattelli, M., Stecchi, F., Fabbri, S., & Gabbianelli, G. (2013) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs5126880 · Cited by 770
Harwin, S., & Lucieer, A. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4061573 · Cited by 639
Agricultural remote sensing big data: Management and applications
Huang, Y., CHEN, Z.-X., YU, T., HUANG, X.-Z., & GU, X.-F. (2018) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(17)61859-8 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosnell, T., & Honkavaara, E.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-01-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 453-480
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079958139
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 29.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s120100453
- The paper
- Rosnell, T., & Honkavaara, E. (2012). Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120100453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.