The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Imagery for Quantitative Monitoring of Wheat Crop in Small Plots
Open accessAbstract
This paper outlines how light Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) can be used in remote sensing for precision farming. It focuses on the combination of simple digital photographic cameras with spectral filters, designed to provide multispectral images in the visible and near-infrared domains. In 2005, these instruments were fitted to powered glider and parachute, and flown at six dates staggered over the crop season. We monitored ten varieties of wheat, grown in trial micro-plots in the South-West of France. For each date, we acquired multiple views in four spectral bands corresponding to blue, green, red, and near-infrared. We then performed accurate corrections of image vignetting, geometric distortions, and radiometric bidirectional effects. Afterwards, we derived for each experimental micro-plot several vegetation indexes relevant for vegetation analyses. Finally, we sought relationships between these indexes and field-measured biophysical parameters, both generic and date-specific. Therefore, we established a robust and stable generic relationship between, in one hand, leaf area index and NDVI and, in the other hand, nitrogen uptake and GNDVI. Due to a high amount of noise in the data, it was not possible to obtain a more accurate model for each date independently. A validation protocol showed that we could expect a precision level of 15% in the biophysical parameters estimation while using these relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image registration methods: a survey
Zitová, B., & Flusser, J. (2003) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/s0262-8856(03)00137-9 · Cited by 6,423
Cited by
Turner, D., Lucieer, A., & Watson, C. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4051392 · Cited by 744
Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review
Sankaran, S., Khot, L. R., Espinoza, C. Z., Jarolmasjed, S., Sathuvalli, V. R., Vandemark, G. J., Miklas, P. N., Carter, A. H., Pumphrey, M. O., Knowles, N. R., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.004 · Cited by 507
Barbedo, J. (2019) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones3020040 · Cited by 391
What good are unmanned aircraft systems for agricultural remote sensing and precision agriculture?
Hunt, E. R., & Daughtry, C. S. T. (2018) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1410300 · Cited by 325
Plant adaptation to climate change—opportunities and priorities in breeding
Chapman, S. C., Chakraborty, S., Dreccer, M. F., & Howden, S. M. (2012) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp11303 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Lelong, C. C. D., Burger, P., Jubelin, G., Roux, B., Labbé, S., & Baret, F.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2008-05-26
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3557-3585
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122348296
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Imagery for Quantitative Monitoring of Wheat Crop in Small Plots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s8053557
- The paper
- Lelong, C. C. D., Burger, P., Jubelin, G., Roux, B., Labbé, S., & Baret, F. (2008). Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Imagery for Quantitative Monitoring of Wheat Crop in Small Plots. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8053557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.