The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E-SAP: Efficient-Strong Authentication Protocol for Healthcare Applications Using Wireless Medical Sensor Networks
Open accessAbstract
A wireless medical sensor network (WMSN) can sense humans’ physiological signs without sacrificing patient comfort and transmit patient vital signs to health professionals’ hand-held devices. The patient physiological data are highly sensitive and WMSNs are extremely vulnerable to many attacks. Therefore, it must be ensured that patients’ medical signs are not exposed to unauthorized users. Consequently, strong user authentication is the main concern for the success and large scale deployment of WMSNs. In this regard, this paper presents an efficient, strong authentication protocol, named E-SAP, for healthcare application using WMSNs. The proposed E-SAP includes: (1) a two-factor (i.e., password and smartcard) professional authentication; (2) mutual authentication between the professional and the medical sensor; (3) symmetric encryption/decryption for providing message confidentiality; (4) establishment of a secure session key at the end of authentication; and (5) professionals can change their password. Further, the proposed protocol requires three message exchanges between the professional, medical sensor node and gateway node, and achieves efficiency (i.e., low computation and communication cost). Through the formal analysis, security analysis and performance analysis, we demonstrate that E-SAP is more secure against many practical attacks, and allows a tradeoff between the security and the performance cost for healthcare application using WMSNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Istepanian, R. S. H., Jovanov, E., & Zhang, Y. T. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2004.840019 · Cited by 766
Health informatics and the delivery of care to older people
Koch, S., & Hägglund, M. (2009) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.023 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Seizure detection, seizure prediction, and closed-loop warning systems in epilepsy
Ramgopal, S., Thome-Souza, S., Jackson, M., Kadish, N. E., Sánchez Fernández, I., Klehm, J., Bosl, W., Reinsberger, C., Schachter, S., & Loddenkemper, T. (2014) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.06.023 · Cited by 469
A Survey of Internet of Things (IoT) Authentication Schemes
El-hajj, M., Fadlallah, A., Chamoun, M., & Serhrouchni, A. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19051141 · Cited by 434
Wang, D., Li, W., & Wang, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2834351 · Cited by 272
Wu, F., Li, X., Sangaiah, A. K., Xu, L., Kumari, S., Wu, L., & Shen, J. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.08.042 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, P., Lee, S.-G., & Lee, H.-J.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-02-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1625-1647
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085804273
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-SAP: Efficient-Strong Authentication Protocol for Healthcare Applications Using Wireless Medical Sensor Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s120201625
- The paper
- Kumar, P., Lee, S.-G., & Lee, H.-J. (2012). E-SAP: Efficient-Strong Authentication Protocol for Healthcare Applications Using Wireless Medical Sensor Networks. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120201625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.