The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Internet of Things (IoT) Authentication Schemes
Open accessAbstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is the ability to provide everyday devices with a way of identification and another way for communication with each other. The spectrum of IoT application domains is very large including smart homes, smart cities, wearables, e-health, etc. Consequently, tens and even hundreds of billions of devices will be connected. Such devices will have smart capabilities to collect, analyze and even make decisions without any human interaction. Security is a supreme requirement in such circumstances, and in particular authentication is of high interest given the damage that could happen from a malicious unauthenticated device in an IoT system. This paper gives a near complete and up-to-date view of the IoT authentication field. It provides a summary of a large range of authentication protocols proposed in the literature. Using a multi-criteria classification previously introduced in our work, it compares and evaluates the proposed authentication protocols, showing their strengths and weaknesses, which constitutes a fundamental first step for researchers and developers addressing this domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bubbles of Trust: A decentralized blockchain-based authentication system for IoT
Hammi, M. T., Hammi, B., Bellot, P., & Serhrouchni, A. (2018) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2018.06.004 · Cited by 691 · cited 2×
“[150] A + N + P Encryption/+Assymmetric + Hashing X(ID, token) 2 C/H I +New architecture of using Blockchain in IoT.”
MethodSelf-citationReference Architectures for the Internet of Things
Weyrich, M., & Ebert, C. (2016) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2016.20 · Cited by 446
DTLS based security and two-way authentication for the Internet of Things
Kothmayr, T., Schmitt, C., Hu, W., Brünig, M., & Carle, G. (2013) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.05.003 · Cited by 391
Gope, P., & Hwang, T. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2585081 · Cited by 267
Low-Energy Security: Limits and Opportunities in the Internet of Things
Trappe, W., Howard, R., & Moore, R. S. (2015) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2015.7 · Cited by 246
Secure and efficient user authentication scheme for multi-gateway wireless sensor networks
Srinivas, J., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Mishra, D. (2017) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.11.002 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Digital Image Watermarking Techniques: A Review
Begum, M., & Uddin, M. S. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11020110 · Cited by 303
Kanellopoulos, D., Sharma, V. K., Panagiotakopoulos, T., & Kameas, A. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12112490 · Cited by 120
Securing IIoT using Defence-in-Depth: Towards an End-to-End secure Industry 4.0
Mosteiro-Sanchez, A., Barcelo, M., Astorga, J., & Urbieta, A. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.10.011 · Cited by 64
Bouzidi, M., Gupta, N., Cheikh, F. A., Shalaginov, A., & Derawi, M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207472 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- El-hajj, M., Fadlallah, A., Chamoun, M., & Serhrouchni, A.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-03-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1141
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2919782006
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 35.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Internet of Things (IoT) Authentication Schemes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s19051141
- The paper
- El-hajj, M., Fadlallah, A., Chamoun, M., & Serhrouchni, A. (2019). A Survey of Internet of Things (IoT) Authentication Schemes. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.