Drift Removal for Improving the Accuracy of Gait Parameters Using Wearable Sensor Systems
Open accessAbstract
Accumulated signal noise will cause the integrated values to drift from the true value when measuring orientation angles of wearable sensors. This work proposes a novel method to reduce the effect of this drift to accurately measure human gait using wearable sensors. Firstly, an infinite impulse response (IIR) digital 4th order Butterworth filter was implemented to remove the noise from the raw gyro sensor data. Secondly, the mode value of the static state gyro sensor data was subtracted from the measured data to remove offset values. Thirdly, a robust double derivative and integration method was introduced to remove any remaining drift error from the data. Lastly, sensor attachment errors were minimized by establishing the gravitational acceleration vector from the acceleration data at standing upright and sitting posture. These improvements proposed allowed for removing the drift effect, and showed an average of 2.1°, 33.3°, 15.6° difference for the hip knee and ankle joint flexion/extension angle, when compared to without implementation. Kinematic and spatio-temporal gait parameters were also calculated from the heel-contact and toe-off timing of the foot. The data provided in this work showed potential of using wearable sensors in clinical evaluation of patients with gait-related diseases.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Health monitoring sensors are subject to noise and drift, which can cause fluctuations in the measurements they provide.
“First, sensors can be subject to noise and drift, which can cause fluctuations in the measurements they provide (Dong et al. 2021; Kai Dong et al. 2020; Takeda et al. 2014).”
From Artificial intelligence enhanced sensors - enabling technologies to next-generation healthcare and biomedical platform (2023) · cites this paper as Takeda et al. 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Takeda, R., Lisco, G., Fujisawa, T., Gastaldi, L., Tohyama, H., & Tadano, S.
- Affiliations
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Tadano, Shigeru
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-12-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 23230-23247
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4299060
- OpenAlex
- W2017918432
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hokkaido University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Keywords
- drift correction, wearable sensors, gait analysis, gyroscope noise, offset correction, joint angle measurement, spatiotemporal gait parameters, clinical gait analysis
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Equipment Design, Gait, Humans, Leg, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Transducers, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Actigraphy, Signal-To-Noise Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review