Cited by 84Gait Recognition and AnalysisInertial Sensor and NavigationBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Drift Removal for Improving the Accuracy of Gait Parameters Using Wearable Sensor Systems

Open access
Takeda, Ryo, Lisco, Giulia, Fujisawa, Tadashi, Gastaldi, Laura, Tohyama, Harukazu, Tadano, Shigeru·2014·Sensors

Abstract

Accumulated signal noise will cause the integrated values to drift from the true value when measuring orientation angles of wearable sensors. This work proposes a novel method to reduce the effect of this drift to accurately measure human gait using wearable sensors. Firstly, an infinite impulse response (IIR) digital 4th order Butterworth filter was implemented to remove the noise from the raw gyro sensor data. Secondly, the mode value of the static state gyro sensor data was subtracted from the measured data to remove offset values. Thirdly, a robust double derivative and integration method was introduced to remove any remaining drift error from the data. Lastly, sensor attachment errors were minimized by establishing the gravitational acceleration vector from the acceleration data at standing upright and sitting posture. These improvements proposed allowed for removing the drift effect, and showed an average of 2.1°, 33.3°, 15.6° difference for the hip knee and ankle joint flexion/extension angle, when compared to without implementation. Kinematic and spatio-temporal gait parameters were also calculated from the heel-contact and toe-off timing of the foot. The data provided in this work showed potential of using wearable sensors in clinical evaluation of patients with gait-related diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s141223230

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 84

Authors
Takeda, R., Lisco, G., Fujisawa, T., Gastaldi, L., Tohyama, H., & Tadano, S.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Corresponding author
Tadano, Shigeru
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2014-12-05
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
23230-23247
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017918432
Cited by
84
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hokkaido University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
drift correction, wearable sensors, gait analysis, gyroscope noise, offset correction, joint angle measurement, spatiotemporal gait parameters, clinical gait analysis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Equipment Design, Gait, Humans, Leg, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Transducers, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Actigraphy, Signal-To-Noise Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review