The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Count: Fruit Counting Based on Deep Simulated Learning
Open accessAbstract
Recent years have witnessed significant advancement in computer vision research based on deep learning. Success of these tasks largely depends on the availability of a large amount of training samples. Labeling the training samples is an expensive process. In this paper, we present a simulated deep convolutional neural network for yield estimation. Knowing the exact number of fruits, flowers, and trees helps farmers to make better decisions on cultivation practices, plant disease prevention, and the size of harvest labor force. The current practice of yield estimation based on the manual counting of fruits or flowers by workers is a very time consuming and expensive process and it is not practical for big fields. Automatic yield estimation based on robotic agriculture provides a viable solution in this regard. Our network is trained entirely on synthetic data and tested on real data. To capture features on multiple scales, we used a modified version of the Inception-ResNet architecture. Our algorithm counts efficiently even if fruits are under shadow, occluded by foliage, branches, or if there is some degree of overlap amongst fruits. Experimental results show a 91% average test accuracy on real images and 93% on synthetic images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Cited by
Apple detection during different growth stages in orchards using the improved YOLO-V3 model
Tian, Y., Yang, G., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Li, E., & Liang, Z. (2019) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.012 · Cited by 1,043
IoT in smart cities: A survey of technologies, practices and challenges
Syed, A. S., Sierra-Sosa, D., Kumar, A., & Elmaghraby, A. (2021) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities4020024 · Cited by 527
Fruit recognition from images using deep learning
Mureşan, H., & Oltean, M. (2018) · Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Informatica · doi:10.2478/ausi-2018-0002 · Cited by 426
YOLO-Tomato: A Robust Algorithm for Tomato Detection Based on YOLOv3
Liu, G., Nouaze, J. C., Touko Mbouembe, P. L., & Kim, J. H. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20072145 · Cited by 417
A Review of Convolutional Neural Network Applied to Fruit Image Processing
Naranjo-Torres, J., Mora, M., Hernández-García, R., Barrientos, R. J., Fredes, C., & Valenzuela, A. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10103443 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahnemoonfar, M., & Sheppard, C.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-04-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 905
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611227133
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 44.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Count: Fruit Counting Based on Deep Simulated Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s17040905
- The paper
- Rahnemoonfar, M., & Sheppard, C. (2017). Deep Count: Fruit Counting Based on Deep Simulated Learning. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040905
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.