The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skin Lesion Analysis towards Melanoma Detection Using Deep Learning Network
Open accessAbstract
Skin lesions are a severe disease globally. Early detection of melanoma in dermoscopy images significantly increases the survival rate. However, the accurate recognition of melanoma is extremely challenging due to the following reasons: low contrast between lesions and skin, visual similarity between melanoma and non-melanoma lesions, etc. Hence, reliable automatic detection of skin tumors is very useful to increase the accuracy and efficiency of pathologists. In this paper, we proposed two deep learning methods to address three main tasks emerging in the area of skin lesion image processing, i.e., lesion segmentation (task 1), lesion dermoscopic feature extraction (task 2) and lesion classification (task 3). A deep learning framework consisting of two fully convolutional residual networks (FCRN) is proposed to simultaneously produce the segmentation result and the coarse classification result. A lesion index calculation unit (LICU) is developed to refine the coarse classification results by calculating the distance heat-map. A straight-forward CNN is proposed for the dermoscopic feature extraction task. The proposed deep learning frameworks were evaluated on the ISIC 2017 dataset. Experimental results show the promising accuracies of our frameworks, i.e., 0.753 for task 1, 0.848 for task 2 and 0.912 for task 3 were achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning
Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., & Alemi, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 · Cited by 4,636
Codella, N. C. F., Gutman, D., Celebi, M. E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M. A., Dusza, S. W., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., Mishra, N., Kittler, H., et al. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2018.8363547 · Cited by 2,620
Cited by
Codella, N. C. F., Gutman, D., Celebi, M. E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M. A., Dusza, S. W., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., Mishra, N., Kittler, H., et al. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2018.8363547 · Cited by 2,620
Ali, M. S., Miah, M. S., Haque, J., Rahman, M. M., & Islam, M. K. (2021) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100036 · Cited by 415
Skin cancer diagnosis based on optimized convolutional neural network
Zhang, N., Cai, Y.-X., Wang, Y.-Y., Tian, Y.-T., Wang, X.-L., & Badami, B. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101756 · Cited by 312
Transfer learning using a multi-scale and multi-network ensemble for skin lesion classification
Mahbod, A., Schaefer, G., Wang, C., Dorffner, G., Ecker, R., & Ellinger, I. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105475 · Cited by 312
Naeem, A., Farooq, M. S., Khelifi, A., & Abid, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3001507 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., & Shen, L.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-02-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 556
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2592160412
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 25.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skin Lesion Analysis towards Melanoma Detection Using Deep Learning Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s18020556
- The paper
- Li, Y., & Shen, L. (2018). Skin Lesion Analysis towards Melanoma Detection Using Deep Learning Network. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
