The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
2D Materials for Gas Sensing Applications: A Review on Graphene Oxide, MoS2, WS2 and Phosphorene
Open accessAbstract
After the synthesis of graphene, in the first year of this century, a wide research field on two-dimensional materials opens. 2D materials are characterized by an intrinsic high surface to volume ratio, due to their heights of few atoms, and, differently from graphene, which is a semimetal with zero or near zero bandgap, they usually have a semiconductive nature. These two characteristics make them promising candidate for a new generation of gas sensing devices. Graphene oxide, being an intermediate product of graphene fabrication, has been the first graphene-like material studied and used to detect target gases, followed by MoS2, in the first years of 2010s. Along with MoS2, which is now experiencing a new birth, after its use as a lubricant, other sulfides and selenides (like WS2, WSe2, MoSe2, etc.) have been used for the fabrication of nanoelectronic devices and for gas sensing applications. All these materials show a bandgap, tunable with the number of layers. On the other hand, 2D materials constituted by one atomic species have been synthetized, like phosphorene (one layer of black phosphorous), germanene (one atom thick layer of germanium) and silicone (one atom thick layer of silicon). In this paper, a comprehensive review of 2D materials-based gas sensor is reported, mainly focused on the recent developments of graphene oxide, exfoliated MoS2 and WS2 and phosphorene, for gas detection applications. We will report on their use as sensitive materials for conductometric, capacitive and optical gas sensors, the state of the art and future perspectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102896 · Cited by 66,834
Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides
Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N., & Strano, M. S. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.193 · Cited by 16,374
Two-dimensional atomic crystals
Novoselov, K. S., Jiang, D., Schedin, F., Booth, T. J., Khotkevich, V. V., Morozov, S. V., & Geim, A. K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502848102 · Cited by 11,788
Song, Z., Wei, Z., Wang, B., Luo, Z., Xu, S., Zhang, W., Yu, H., Li, M., Huang, Z., Zang, J., et al. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04850 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Qian, L., Durairaj, S., Prins, S., & Chen, A. (2021) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2020.112836 · Cited by 396
An overview of proton exchange membranes for fuel cells: Materials and manufacturing
Ahmad, S., Nawaz, T., Ali, A., Orhan, M. F., Samreen, A., & Kannan, A. M. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.099 · Cited by 336
Recent Advances in Emerging 2D Material‐Based Gas Sensors: Potential in Disease Diagnosis
Zhang, L., Khan, K., Zou, J., Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2019) · Advanced Materials Interfaces · doi:10.1002/admi.201901329 · Cited by 281
Recent progress in the chemical reduction of graphene oxide by green reductants–A Mini review
Kurian, M. (2021) · Carbon Trends · doi:10.1016/j.cartre.2021.100120 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Donarelli, M., & Ottaviano, L.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-10-26
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3638
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898341701
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2D Materials for Gas Sensing Applications: A Review on Graphene Oxide, MoS2, WS2 and Phosphorene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s18113638
- The paper
- Donarelli, M., & Ottaviano, L. (2018). 2D Materials for Gas Sensing Applications: A Review on Graphene Oxide, MoS2, WS2 and Phosphorene. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.