The DOI matches its Crossref record; 193 of the 193 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ECG Monitoring Systems: Review, Architecture, Processes, and Key Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Health monitoring and its related technologies is an attractive research area. The electrocardiogram (ECG) has always been a popular measurement scheme to assess and diagnose cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The number of ECG monitoring systems in the literature is expanding exponentially. Hence, it is very hard for researchers and healthcare experts to choose, compare, and evaluate systems that serve their needs and fulfill the monitoring requirements. This accentuates the need for a verified reference guiding the design, classification, and analysis of ECG monitoring systems, serving both researchers and professionals in the field. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive, expert-verified taxonomy of ECG monitoring systems and conduct an extensive, systematic review of the literature. This provides evidence-based support for critically understanding ECG monitoring systems’ components, contexts, features, and challenges. Hence, a generic architectural model for ECG monitoring systems is proposed, an extensive analysis of ECG monitoring systems’ value chain is conducted, and a thorough review of the relevant literature, classified against the experts’ taxonomy, is presented, highlighting challenges and current trends. Finally, we identify key challenges and emphasize the importance of smart monitoring systems that leverage new technologies, including deep learning, artificial intelligence (AI), Big Data and Internet of Things (IoT), to provide efficient, cost-aware, and fully connected monitoring systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: An approach for predicting health status in IoT health care
Zamanifar, A., & Nazemi, E. (2019) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.02.029 · Cited by 15
RetractedCompressed Sensing for Real-Time Energy-Efficient ECG Compression on Wireless Body Sensor Nodes
Mamaghanian, H., Khaled, N., Atienza, D., & Vandergheynst, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2156795 · Cited by 701
Wearable Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Review
Windmiller, J. R., & Wang, J. (2013) · Electroanalysis · doi:10.1002/elan.201200349 · Cited by 696
Sposato, L. A., Cipriano, L. E., Saposnik, G., Vargas, E. R., Riccio, P. M., & Hachinski, V. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70027-x · Cited by 694
Tuli, S., Basumatary, N., Gill, S. S., Kahani, M., Arya, R. C., Wander, G. S., & Buyya, R. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.10.043 · Cited by 669
Drew, B. J., Califf, R. M., Funk, M., Kaufman, E. S., Krucoff, M. W., Laks, M. M., Macfarlane, P. W., Sommargren, C., Swiryn, S., & Van Hare, G. F. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000145144.56673.59 · Cited by 609
Spread spectrum image steganography
Marvel, L. M., Boncelet, C. G., & Retter, C. T. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.777088 · Cited by 605
Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signal Analysis: A Review
Egger, M., Ley, M., & Hanke, S. (2019) · Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2019.04.009 · Cited by 561
Steinhubl, S. R., Waalen, J., Edwards, A. M., Ariniello, L. M., Mehta, R. R., Ebner, G. S., Carter, C., Baca-Motes, K., Felicione, E., Sarich, T., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.8102 · Cited by 539 · cited 1×
“While according to the authors of [18], the effect of home-based wearable continuous ECG monitoring covers the discovery of undiagnosed AF in a randomized clinical trial, in [20] a real-time wearable ECG monitoring system for cardiac arrhythmia classification is introduced in a living environment.”
BackgroundBarrett, P. M., Komatireddy, R., Haaser, S., Topol, S., Sheard, J., Encinas, J., Fought, A. J., & Topol, E. J. (2014) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003 · Cited by 498
Cited by
Jabin, M. S. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1367431 · Cited by 43
Cross-modal multiscale multi-instance learning for long-term ECG classification
Chen, L., Lian, C., Zeng, Z., Xu, B., & Su, Y. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119230 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Serhani, M. A., T. El Kassabi, H., Ismail, H., & Nujum Navaz, A.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-03-24
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1796
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3013413803
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 193
- FWCI
- 24.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ECG Monitoring Systems: Review, Architecture, Processes, and Key Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s20061796
- The paper
- Serhani, M. A., T. El Kassabi, H., Ismail, H., & Nujum Navaz, A. (2020). ECG Monitoring Systems: Review, Architecture, Processes, and Key Challenges. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20061796
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.