The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wearable Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Review
Abstract
This article reviews recent advances and developments in the field of wearable sensors with emphasis on a subclass of these devices that are able to perform highly‐sensitive electrochemical analysis. Recent insights into novel fabrication methodologies and electrochemical techniques have resulted in the demonstration of chemical sensors able to augment conventional physical measurements (i.e. heart rate, EEG, ECG, etc.), thereby providing added dimensions of rich, analytical information to the wearer in a timely manner. Wearable electrochemical sensors have been integrated onto both textile materials and directly on the epidermis for various monitoring applications owing to their unique ability to process chemical analytes in a non‐invasive and non‐obtrusive fashion. In this manner, multi‐analyte detection can easily be performed, in real time, in order to ascertain the overall physiological health of the wearer or to identify potential offenders in their environment. Of profound importance is the development of an understanding of the impact of mechanical strain on textile‐ and epidermal (tattoo)‐based sensors and their failure mechanisms as well as the compatibility of the substrate employed in the fabrication process. We conclude this review with a retrospective outlook of the field and identify potential implications of this new sensing paradigm in the healthcare, fitness, security, and environmental monitoring domains. With continued innovation and detailed attention to core challenges, it is expected that wearable electrochemical sensors will play a pivotal role in the emergent body sensor networks arena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, D.-H., Lu, N., Ma, R., Kim, Y.-S., Kim, R.-H., Wang, S., Wu, J., Won, S. M., Tao, H., Islam, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1206157 · Cited by 4,836
Electrochemical Glucose Biosensors
Wang, J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068123a · Cited by 3,498
Self-citationA Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis
Pantelopoulos, A., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2009.2032660 · Cited by 2,296
Cited by
Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring
Kim, J., Campbell, A. S., de Ávila, B. E.-F., & Wang, J. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y · Cited by 3,373
Self-citationStretchable, Skin-Mountable, and Wearable Strain Sensors and Their Potential Applications: A Review
Amjadi, M., Kyung, K., Park, I., & Sitti, M. (2016) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201504755 · Cited by 3,202
Wearable Electronics and Smart Textiles: A Critical Review
Stoppa, M., & Chiolerio, A. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s140711957 · Cited by 2,107
Bariya, M., Nyein, H. Y. Y., & Javey, A. (2018) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-018-0043-y · Cited by 1,486
Wearable sensors: modalities, challenges, and prospects
Heikenfeld, J., Jajack, A., Rogers, J., Gutruf, P., Tian, L., Pan, T., Li, R., Khine, M., Kim, J., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c7lc00914c · Cited by 1,434
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Windmiller, J. R., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Electroanalysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-46
- ISSN
- 1040-0397 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4109
- OpenAlex
- W2135840203
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wearable Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elan.201200349
- The paper
- Windmiller, J. R., & Wang, J. (2013). Wearable Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Review. Electroanalysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201200349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.