Cited by 798Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringStructural Engineering and Materials Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 234 of the 234 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection through Deep Learning: State-of-the-Art Review

Open access
Azimi, Mohsen, Eslamlou, Armin, Pekcan, Gokhan·2020·Sensors

Abstract

Data-driven methods in structural health monitoring (SHM) is gaining popularity due to recent technological advancements in sensors, as well as high-speed internet and cloud-based computation. Since the introduction of deep learning (DL) in civil engineering, particularly in SHM, this emerging and promising tool has attracted significant attention among researchers. The main goal of this paper is to review the latest publications in SHM using emerging DL-based methods and provide readers with an overall understanding of various SHM applications. After a brief introduction, an overview of various DL methods (e.g., deep neural networks, transfer learning, etc.) is presented. The procedure and application of vibration-based, vision-based monitoring, along with some of the recent technologies used for SHM, such as sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), etc. are discussed. The review concludes with prospects and potential limitations of DL-based methods in SHM applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s20102778

Cites

234 of 234 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 232 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014, January 8–13). Generative adversarial nets. Proceedings of the Advances in neural information processing systems, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  2. Zink, 2015, Unmanned Aer, Veh. Bridge Insp. Demonstr. Proj., 32, 76
  3. Wells, 2017, Unmanned Aircr, Syst. Bridge Insp. Demonstr. Proj. Phase II Final. Rep., 13, 45
  4. Gopalakrishnan, K. (2018). Symposium on Automation and Robotics. Deep Learn. Pavement Image Anal. Autom. Distress Detect. Rev., 9.
  5. Nahata, 2019, Post-Earthquake. Assessment. Buildlings Using Deep Learning, J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 8, 330
  6. Gao, Y., Li, K., Mosalam, K., and Günay, S. (2018, January 16–25). Deep Residual Network with Transfer Learning for Imagebased Structural Damage Recognition. Proceedings of the Eleventh US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Integrating Science, Engineering Policy, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  7. Sharma, M., Anotaipaiboon, W., and Chaiyasarn, K. (2018, January 20–25). Crack Detection in Masonry Structures using Convolutional Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines. Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2018), Berlin, Germany.
  8. Aono, K., Kondapalli, S.H., Lajnef, N., Pekcan, G., Faridazar, F., and Chakrabartty, S. (2017, January 22–23). Self-powered Sensors to Facilitate Infrastructural Internet-of-Things for Smart Structures. Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Advanced Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  9. Brockman, G., Cheung, V., Pettersson, L., Schneider, J., Schulman, J., Tang, J., and Zaremba, W. (2020, May 09). Openai Gym. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01540. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 798

Metadata

Authors
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
Corresponding author
Azimi, Mohsen
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-13
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
2778
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024912007
Cited by
769
References
232
Citations by year
2026: 151 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 14
FWCI
44.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1646420)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
Keywords
structural health monitoring, damage detection, deep learning, vibration-based condition monitoring, vision-based monitoring, transfer learning, deep neural network, unmanned aerial vehicles, structural sensors, civil infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review