The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification of Skin Disease Using Deep Learning Neural Networks with MobileNet V2 and LSTM
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning models are efficient in learning the features that assist in understanding complex patterns precisely. This study proposed a computerized process of classifying skin disease through deep learning based MobileNet V2 and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM). The MobileNet V2 model proved to be efficient with a better accuracy that can work on lightweight computational devices. The proposed model is efficient in maintaining stateful information for precise predictions. A grey-level co-occurrence matrix is used for assessing the progress of diseased growth. The performance has been compared against other state-of-the-art models such as Fine-Tuned Neural Networks (FTNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition developed by Visual Geometry Group (VGG), and convolutional neural network architecture that expanded with few changes. The HAM10000 dataset is used and the proposed method has outperformed other methods with more than 85% accuracy. Its robustness in recognizing the affected region much faster with almost 2× lesser computations than the conventional MobileNet model results in minimal computational efforts. Furthermore, a mobile application is designed for instant and proper action. It helps the patient and dermatologists identify the type of disease from the affected region’s image at the initial stage of the skin disease. These findings suggest that the proposed system can help general practitioners efficiently and effectively diagnose skin conditions, thereby reducing further complications and morbidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Skin lesion classification using decision trees and random forest algorithms
Dhivyaa, C. R., Sangeetha, K., -, M. B., Amaran, S., Vetriselvi, T., & Johnpaul, P. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02675-8 · Cited by 90
RetractedViji, C., Rajkumar, N., Suganthi, S. T., Venkatachalam, K., Kumar, T. R., & Pandiyan, S. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02267-6 · Cited by 22
RetractedDeep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications
Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.04861 · Cited by 19,015
Tschandl, P., Rosendahl, C., & Kittler, H. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.161 · Cited by 3,628
A review on the long short-term memory model
Van Houdt, G., Mosquera, C., & Nápoles, G. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09838-1 · Cited by 1,991
Automated Melanoma Recognition in Dermoscopy Images via Very Deep Residual Networks
Yu, L., Chen, H., Dou, Q., Qin, J., & Heng, P.-A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2642839 · Cited by 1,140
Deep convolutional neural network based medical image classification for disease diagnosis
Yadav, S. S., & Jadhav, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0276-2 · Cited by 1,069
An ensemble of fine-tuned convolutional neural networks for medical image classification
Kumar, A., Kim, J., Lyndon, D., Fulham, M., & Feng, D. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2016.2635663 · Cited by 515
Cited by
Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review
Mennella, C., Maniscalco, U., De Pietro, G., & Esposito, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297 · Cited by 1,229
Kumar, Y., Koul, A., Singla, R., & Ijaz, M. F. (2023) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-021-03612-z · Cited by 1,040
Self-citationRetractedShetty, B., Fernandes, R., Rodrigues, A. P., Chengoden, R., Bhattacharya, S., & Lakshmanna, K. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22644-9 · Cited by 290
Melanoma detection using deep learning-based classifications
Alwakid, G., Gouda, W., Humayun, M., & Sama, N. U. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10122481 · Cited by 153
Melarkode, N., Srinivasan, K., Qaisar, S. M., & Plawiak, P. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15041183 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivasu, P. N., SivaSai, J. G., Ijaz, M. F., Bhoi, A. K., Kim, W., & Kang, J. J.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-04-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2852
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3156313549
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 44.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of Skin Disease Using Deep Learning Neural Networks with MobileNet V2 and LSTM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s21082852
- The paper
- Srinivasu, P. N., SivaSai, J. G., Ijaz, M. F., Bhoi, A. K., Kim, W., & Kang, J. J. (2021). Classification of Skin Disease Using Deep Learning Neural Networks with MobileNet V2 and LSTM. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082852
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.