Wearable Devices for Environmental Monitoring in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
The so-called Internet of Things (IoT), which is rapidly increasing the number of network-connected and interconnected objects, could have a far-reaching impact in identifying the link between human health, well-being, and environmental concerns. In line with the IoT concept, many commercial wearables have been introduced in recent years, which differ from the usual devices in that they use the term “smart” alongside the terms “watches”, “glasses”, and “jewellery”. Commercially available wearables aim to enhance smartphone functionality by enabling payment for commercial items or monitoring physical activity. However, what is the trend of scientific production about the concept of wearables regarding environmental monitoring issues? What are the main areas of interest covered by scientific production? What are the main findings and limitations of the developed solution in this field? The methodology used to answer the above questions is based on a systematic review. The data were acquired following a reproducible methodology. The main result is that, among the thermal, visual, acoustic, and air quality environmental factors, the last one is the most considered when using wearables even though in combination with some others. Another relevant finding is that of the acquired studies; in only one, the authors shared their wearables as an open-source device, and it will probably be necessary to encourage researchers to consider open-source as a means to promote scalability and proliferation of new wearables customized to cover different domains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exposure of the human body to sunlight or artificial lighting can be evaluated by monitoring changes in hormone production, circadian stimuli, or circadian levels.
“We can evaluate the exposure of the human body to sunlight or artificial lighting, where changes in hormone production, circadian stimuli, or circadian levels are monitored [190].”
From The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables (2022) · cites this paper as [190]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 124 · Cited by 89
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [27]Picard R.W. Affective Wearables Affect. Comput. 2000 90 97 10.7551/mitpress/1140.003.0012 · DOI
- [42]Stansfeld S.A. Environmental noise guidelines for the european region Proc. Inst. Acoust. 2019 41 17 20 Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/environmental-noise-guidelines-for-the-european-region-2018 (accessed on 9 June 2021)
- [43]Masullo M. Maffei L. Sorrentino F. Ruggiero G. Rapuano M. Effects of fan coils noise on cognitive performances in offices Proceedings of the 25th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV25) Hiroshima, Japan 8–12 July 2018
- [47]Scopus Search Guide Available online: http://schema.elsevier.com/dtds/document/bkapi/search/SCOPUSSearchTips.htm (accessed on 9 June 2021)
- [93]Tian R. Dierk C. Myers C. Paulos E. MyPart Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems San Jose, CA, USA 7–12 May 2016
- [103]Kim S. Paulos E. Gross M.D. WearAir Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction Cambridge, MA, USA 24–27 January 2010
- [111]Kao M.C. Lung S.C. Personal particulate exposures in Buddhist temples Chin. J. Public Health 2000 19 138 143 10.6288/CJPH2000-19-02-08 · DOI
- Authors
- Salamone, F., Masullo, M., & Sibilio, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Salamone, Francesco
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-07-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4727
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8309593
- OpenAlex
- W3182327054
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
- Keywords
- wearable devices, environmental monitoring, built environment, Internet of Things, air quality, thermal comfort, visual comfort, acoustic comfort, open-source hardware, health and well-being
- MeSH terms
- Wearable Electronic Devices, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review