Cited by 209Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringInternet of Things and AIMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The Rise of Wearable Devices during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Open access
Channa, Asma, Popescu, Nirvana, Skibinska, Justyna, Burget, Radim·2021·Sensors

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc globally and still persists even after a year of its initial outbreak. Several reasons can be considered: people are in close contact with each other, i.e., at a short range (1 m), and the healthcare system is not sufficiently developed or does not have enough facilities to manage and fight the pandemic, even in developed countries such as the USA and the U.K. and countries in Europe. There is a great need in healthcare for remote monitoring of COVID-19 symptoms. In the past year, a number of IoT-based devices and wearables have been introduced by researchers, providing good results in terms of high accuracy in diagnosing patients in the prodromal phase and in monitoring the symptoms of patients, i.e., respiratory rate, heart rate, temperature, etc. In this systematic review, we analyzed these wearables and their need in the healthcare system. The research was conducted using three databases: IEEE Xplore®, Web of Science®, and PubMed Central®, between December 2019 and June 2021. This article was based on the PRISMA guidelines. Initially, 1100 articles were identified while searching the scientific literature regarding this topic. After screening, ultimately, 70 articles were fully evaluated and included in this review. These articles were divided into two categories. The first one belongs to the on-body sensors (wearables), their types and positions, and the use of AI technology with ehealth wearables in different scenarios from screening to contact tracing. In the second category, we discuss the problems and solutions with respect to utilizing these wearables globally. This systematic review provides an extensive overview of wearable systems for the remote management and automated assessment of COVID-19, taking into account the reliability and acceptability of the implemented technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s21175787

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main reason for the upsurge of publications in 2021 may be attributed to the increase of pulse oximetry for triage in patients because of the COVID-19 pandemic and recent concern about accuracy across all skin types.

    “The main reason for this surge may be attributed to the increase of this technique for triage in patients because of the current COVID-19 pandemic [12,13,14,15,16,17], and also because of the recent concern about the accuracy of these devices across all skin types [20,57,58,59,60,61].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 209

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]IEEE IEEE Xplore Digital Library Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp/ (accessed on 25 August 2021)
  2. [14]PubMed National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 25 August 2021)
  3. [16]Park S. Chung K. Jayaraman S. Wearables: Fundamentals, advancements, and a roadmap for the future Wearable Sensors Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2014 1 23

Authors
Channa, A., Popescu, N., Skibinska, J., & Burget, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Reggio Calabria (IT)
  • Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
  • Department of Telecommunications, Brno University of Technology, 61600 Brno, Czech Republic
Corresponding author
  • Channa, Asma
  • Popescu, Nirvana
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-08-28
Volume
21
Issue
17
Pages
5787
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198705930
Cited by
209
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Union’s Horizon 2020 (H2020) Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 call, under the Grant Agreement no 813278 (813278)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable devices, COVID-19 pandemic, remote patient monitoring, Internet of Things, on-body sensors, contact tracing, COVID-19 screening, artificial intelligence, e-health, vital signs monitoring, health technology adoption
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review