Cited by 131Fire Detection and Safety SystemsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFire dynamics and safety research

An Improvement of the Fire Detection and Classification Method Using YOLOv3 for Surveillance Systems

Open access
Abdusalomov, Akmalbek, Baratov, Nodirbek, Kutlimuratov, Alpamis, Whangbo, Taeg Keun·2021·Sensors

Abstract

Currently, sensor-based systems for fire detection are widely used worldwide. Further research has shown that camera-based fire detection systems achieve much better results than sensor-based methods. In this study, we present a method for real-time high-speed fire detection using deep learning. A new special convolutional neural network was developed to detect fire regions using the existing YOLOv3 algorithm. Due to the fact that our real-time fire detector cameras were built on a Banana Pi M3 board, we adapted the YOLOv3 network to the board level. Firstly, we tested the latest versions of YOLO algorithms to select the appropriate algorithm and used it in our study for fire detection. The default versions of the YOLO approach have very low accuracy after training and testing in fire detection cases. We selected the YOLOv3 network to improve and use it for the successful detection and warning of fire disasters. By modifying the algorithm, we recorded the results of a rapid and high-precision detection of fire, during both day and night, irrespective of the shape and size. Another advantage is that the algorithm is capable of detecting fires that are 1 m long and 0.3 m wide at a distance of 50 m. Experimental results showed that the proposed method successfully detected fire candidate areas and achieved a seamless classification performance compared to other conventional fire detection frameworks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s21196519

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The modified YOLOv3 training approach allows algorithm to utilize dataset containing images of both flames and smoke, enabling it to recognize and differentiate between these two features.

    “This training approach allows the algorithm to utilize a dataset that contains images of both flames and smoke, which enables it to effectively recognize and differentiate between these two features.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [133]

    Section 3.1 (Dataset; page unavailable) says the YOLOv3 training images were labeled with flame coordinates and included fire-like negative images, supporting the flame-detection part. It does not say the modified YOLOv3 model was trained to recognize or distinguish smoke. Section 2.2 discusses a fire-and-smoke dataset, but explicitly identifies it as part of the authors’ earlier CNN work, not this YOLOv3 approach. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Training modified YOLOv3 on images containing red color associated with fire improved accuracy of recognition method.

    “The authors improved the accuracy of the recognition method by training the algorithm on images that specifically contained the red color that is typically associated with fire.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [133]

    Section 3.3 (page unavailable) reports that the improved YOLOv3 was trained on an expanded fire-image dataset and achieved higher accuracy. It also says retaining flame color mattered because color augmentation reduced accuracy, but it does not say the training images were selected specifically for their red color. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Training modified YOLOv3 on fire-related images makes model more adept at calculating probability of smoke appearing before flames visible.

    “By training the modified YOLOv3 algorithm on fire-related images, the model becomes more adept at accurately calculating the probability of smoke appearing before any flames become visible.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [133]

    Section 3.2 (page not available) says the authors augmented fire images to train YOLOv3 and used the model to predict fire scores; it also reports early-stage detection of small fire regions. It does not say the model calculates the probability of smoke appearing before flames become visible. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A modified YOLOv3 algorithm developed in [133] detects and classifies regions affected by fire with accuracy 98.9% in 2021.

    “In [133], a modified version of the YOLOv3 algorithm was developed to detect and classify regions affected by fire with an accuracy of 98.9% in 2021.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Introduction and Conclusions describe an improved YOLOv3 method for detecting and classifying fire regions. However, Section 4 (Experimental Results and Discussion) identifies 98.9% as the average of F-measure, recall, and precision—not accuracy. Section 3.3 reports a final fire-detection accuracy of 99.7%. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Redmon J. Farhadi A. YOLOv3: An incremental improvement arXiv 2018 1804.02767
  2. [28]He K. Zhang X. Ren S. Sun J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Las Vegas, NV, USA 26 June–1 July 2016 770 778

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdusalomov, A., Baratov, N., Kutlimuratov, A., & Whangbo, T. K.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Tashkent University of Information Technology (UZ)
Corresponding author
Whangbo, Taeg Keun
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-09-29
Volume
21
Issue
19
Pages
6519
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202825385
Cited by
131
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 2
FWCI
17.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire Detection and Safety Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
Keywords
fire detection, fire classification, YOLOv3, real-time object detection, video surveillance, edge computing, nighttime detection, fire alarm systems
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Fires, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review