The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pelican Optimization Algorithm: A Novel Nature-Inspired Algorithm for Engineering Applications
Open accessAbstract
Optimization is an important and fundamental challenge to solve optimization problems in different scientific disciplines. In this paper, a new stochastic nature-inspired optimization algorithm called Pelican Optimization Algorithm (POA) is introduced. The main idea in designing the proposed POA is simulation of the natural behavior of pelicans during hunting. In POA, search agents are pelicans that search for food sources. The mathematical model of the POA is presented for use in solving optimization issues. The performance of POA is evaluated on twenty-three objective functions of different unimodal and multimodal types. The optimization results of unimodal functions show the high exploitation ability of POA to approach the optimal solution while the optimization results of multimodal functions indicate the high ability of POA exploration to find the main optimal area of the search space. Moreover, four engineering design issues are employed for estimating the efficacy of the POA in optimizing real-world applications. The findings of POA are compared with eight well-known metaheuristic algorithms to assess its competence in optimization. The simulation results and their analysis show that POA has a better and more competitive performance via striking a proportional balance between exploration and exploitation compared to eight competitor algorithms in providing optimal solutions for optimization problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 · Cited by 19,343
The Whale Optimization Algorithm
Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2016) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 · Cited by 14,581
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm
Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H., & Saryazdi, S. (2009) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004 · Cited by 7,358
Rao, R. V., Savsani, V. J., & Vakharia, D. P. (2011) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.015 · Cited by 5,150
Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning
Goldberg, D. E., & Holland, J. H. (1988) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022602019183 · Cited by 3,193
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_16 · Cited by 2,915
Marine Predators Algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic
Faramarzi, A., Heidarinejad, M., Mirjalili, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377 · Cited by 2,412
Aquila Optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm
Abualigah, L., Yousri, D., Abd Elaziz, M., Ewees, A. A., Al-qaness, M. A. A., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107250 · Cited by 2,213
Cited by
Abidi, M. H. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-82624-z · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Trojovský, P., & Dehghani, M.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-01-23
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 855
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206918024
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 61.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pelican Optimization Algorithm: A Novel Nature-Inspired Algorithm for Engineering Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s22030855
- The paper
- Trojovský, P., & Dehghani, M. (2022). Pelican Optimization Algorithm: A Novel Nature-Inspired Algorithm for Engineering Applications. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22030855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.