Cited by 23Indoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesBluetooth and Wireless Communication TechnologiesOptical Wireless Communication Technologies

Combining Multichannel RSSI and Vision with Artificial Neural Networks to Improve BLE Trilateration

Open access
Naghdi, Sharareh, O’Keefe, Kyle·2022·Sensors

Abstract

The demands for accurate positioning and navigation applications in complex indoor environments such as emergency call positioning, fire-fighting services, and rescue operations are increasing continuously. Indoor positioning approaches apply different types of sensors to increase the accuracy of the user’s position. Among these technologies, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) appeared as a popular alternative due to its low cost and energy efficiency. However, BLE faces challenges related to Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) fluctuations caused by human body shadowing. This work presents a method to compensate RSSI values by applying Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithms to RSSI measurements from three BLE advertising channels and a wearable camera as an additional source of information for the presence or absence of human obstacles. The resulting improved RSSI values are then converted into ranges using path loss models, and trilateration is applied to obtain indoor localization. The proposed artificial system provides significantly better localization solutions than fingerprinting or trilateration using uncorrected RSSI values.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22124320

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-enhanced pipelines that fuse BLE RSSI data with vision-based models, such as transformer architectures, classify children's activity patterns and identify spatio-temporal risk behaviors.

    “More recent work has introduced AI-enhanced pipelines that fuse BLE RSSI data with vision-based models, such as transformer architectures, to classify children's activity patterns and identify spatio-temporal risk behaviors, moving from simple location tracking toward more cognitive safety management [16].”

    From Child Playground Entry/Exit Tracking and Log Visualization System Using BLE Beacons and Smart Devices (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction and System Design (pages not supplied) describe combining BLE RSSI, wearable-camera imagery, and artificial neural networks to correct signal obstruction and improve indoor positioning. They do not describe transformer architectures, classify children’s activity patterns, or identify spatio-temporal risk behaviors; the Experimental Setup explicitly distinguishes detecting people in images from tracking them in video. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [44]Takenga C.M. Ieee S.M. Kyamakya K. Pre-Processing of Data in RSS Signature-Based Localization Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication Hannover, Germany 16 March 2006
  2. [46]Hu Y.H. Hwang J.N. Handbook of Neural Network Signal Processing CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naghdi, S., & O’Keefe, K.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
O’Keefe, Kyle
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-06-07
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
4320
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282585228
Cited by
23
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (514520–17)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
Keywords
Bluetooth Low Energy, indoor positioning, trilateration, received signal strength indicator, wearable cameras, human body shadowing, path loss model, artificial neural networks
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Data Collection, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review