Cited by 50Traffic control and managementTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesTransportation Planning and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-Time Adaptive Traffic Signal Control in a Connected and Automated Vehicle Environment: Optimisation of Signal Planning with Reinforcement Learning under Vehicle Speed Guidance

Open access
Maadi, Saeed, Stein, Sebastian, Hong, Jinhyun, Murray-Smith, Roderick·2022·Sensors

Abstract

Adaptive traffic signal control (ATSC) is an effective method to reduce traffic congestion in modern urban areas. Many studies adopted various approaches to adjust traffic signal plans according to real-time traffic in response to demand fluctuations to improve urban network performance (e.g., minimise delay). Recently, learning-based methods such as reinforcement learning (RL) have achieved promising results in signal plan optimisation. However, adopting these self-learning techniques in future traffic environments in the presence of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) remains largely an open challenge. This study develops a real-time RL-based adaptive traffic signal control that optimises a signal plan to minimise the total queue length while allowing the CAVs to adjust their speed based on a fixed timing strategy to decrease total stop delays. The highlight of this work is combining a speed guidance system with a reinforcement learning-based traffic signal control. Two different performance measures are implemented to minimise total queue length and total stop delays. Results indicate that the proposed method outperforms a fixed timing plan (with optimal speed advisory in a CAV environment) and traditional actuated control, in terms of average stop delay of vehicle and queue length, particularly under saturated and oversaturated conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22197501

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mushtaq et al. [19] primarily focuses on traffic optimization without addressing real-time communication dynamics.

    “Although the study demonstrates the effectiveness of MA2C and IA2C in improving traffic flow through smart routing, it primarily focuses on traffic optimization without addressing how real-time communication dynamics.”

    From Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Real-time Traffic Control in 6G-Enabled VANET Environments (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction and Conclusions (pages unavailable) describe this as a study of reinforcement-learning traffic signal control at an isolated intersection, with one signal controller acting as the agent and connected vehicles receiving speed guidance. That contradicts the citing sentence’s description of a Mushtaq et al. study demonstrating MA2C and IA2C through smart routing. The paper discusses real-time vehicle–infrastructure data exchange, but the passages do not establish whether it models communication dynamics such as latency. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Gartner, 1983, OPAC: A demand-responsive strategy for traffic signal control, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 906, 75
  2. Head, 1992, Hierarchical framework for real-time traffic control, Transp. Res. Rec., 1360, 82
  3. Luyanda, 2003, ACS-Lite algorithmic architecture: Applying adaptive control system technology to closed-loop traffic signal control systems, Transp. Res. Record, 1856, 175, 10.3141/1856-19 · DOI
  4. Mirchandani, 2001, A real-time traffic signal control system: Architecture, algorithms, and analysis, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 9, 415, 10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00047-4 · DOI
  5. Ran, Q., and Yang, J. (2012, January 23–25). A novel closed-loop feedback traffic signal control strategy at an isolated intersection. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology, ICIST, Wuhan, China. · DOI
  6. Fagnant, 2015, Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 77, 167, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Elliott, 2019, Recent advances in connected and automated vehicles, J. Traffic Transp. Eng., 6, 109
  8. Feng, 2015, A real-time adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 55, 460, 10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.007 · DOI
  9. Yao, 2022, CTM-based traffic signal optimisation of mixed traffic flow with connected automated vehicles and human-driven vehicles, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl., 603, 127708, 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127708 · DOI
  10. Yao, 2020, A Dynamic Predictive Traffic Signal Control Framework in a Cross-Sectional Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Environment, Proc. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 21, 1455, 10.1109/TITS.2019.2909390 · DOI
  11. Li, 2022, Signalized Corridor Timing Plan Change Assessment Using Connected Vehicle Data, J. Transp. Technol., 12, 310
  12. Yao, 2020, A dynamic optimization method for adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment, Journal of Intelligent Transportation, Systems, 24, 184
  13. Guo, 2019, Urban traffic signal control with connected and automated vehicles: A survey, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 101, 313, 10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.026 · DOI
  14. Mintsis, 2021, Enhanced speed advice for connected vehicles in the proximity of signalized intersections, Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 13, 2, 10.1186/s12544-020-00458-y · DOI
  15. Jiang, 2021, A Two-Level Model for Traffic Signal Timing and Trajectories Planning of Multiple CAVs in a Random Environment, J. Adv. Transp., 2021, 9945398, 10.1155/2021/9945398 · DOI
  16. He, 2015, Optimal vehicle speed trajectory on a signalised arterial with consideration of queue, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 61, 106, 10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.001 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2014, Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part I: Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 40, 271, 10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.023 · DOI
  18. Wu, 2015, Energy-optimal speed control for electric vehicles on signalised arterials, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 16, 2786, 10.1109/TITS.2015.2422778 · DOI
  19. Wang, P., Chan, C.Y., and de La, F.A. (2018, January 26–30). A reinforcement learning-based approach for automated lane change maneuvers. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Changshu/Suzhou, China. · DOI
  20. Abdulhai, 2003, Reinforcement learning: Introduction to theory and potential for transport applications, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 30, 981, 10.1139/l03-014 · DOI
  21. Shatnawi, 2018, Automated intersection delay estimation using the input-output principle and turning movement data, Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol., 7, 137, 10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.04.001 · DOI
  22. Hunt, 1982, The SCOOT online traffic signal optimisation technique (Glasgow), Traffic Eng. Control., 23, 190
  23. Sims, 1980, The Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic (SCAT) System Philosophy and Benefits, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 29, 130, 10.1109/T-VT.1980.23833 · DOI
  24. Athmaraman, N., and Soundararajan, S. (2005, January 18–19). Adaptive predictive traffic timer control algorithm. Proceedings of the 2005 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, IA, USA. Available online: https://www.cs.uic.edu/~nathmara/AthmaramanTraffic.pdf.
  25. Wang, 2018, A Review of the Self-Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System Based on Future Traffic Environment, J. Adv. Transp., 2018, 1096123, 10.1155/2018/1096123 · DOI
  26. Ke-Zhao, B., Rui-Xiong, C., Mu-ren, L., Ling-Jiang, K., and Rong-sen, Z. (2009). Study of the grade roundabout crossing. Comput. Sci. · DOI
  27. Member, 2013, Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Integrated Network of Adaptive Traffic Signal Controllers Application on Downtown Toronto, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 14, 1140, 10.1109/TITS.2013.2255286 · DOI
  28. Jing, P., Huang, H., and Chen, L. (2017). An Adaptive Traffic Signal Control in a Connected Vehicle Environment: A Systematic Review. Information, 8. · DOI
  29. Wu, W., Huang, L., and Du, R. (2020). Simultaneous Optimization of Vehicle Arrival Time and Signal Timings within a Connected Vehicle Environment. Sensors, 20. · DOI
  30. Katsaros, K., Kernchen, R., Dianati, M., and Rieck, D. (2011, January 4–8). Performance study of a Green Light Optimized Speed Advisory (GLOSA) application using an integrated cooperative ITS simulation platform. Proceedings of the IWCMC 2011 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, Istanbul, Turkey. · DOI
  31. Tang, 2018, A speed guidance strategy for multiple signalised intersections based on car-following model, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl., 496, 399, 10.1016/j.physa.2018.01.005 · DOI
  32. Beak, 2017, Adaptive coordination based on connected vehicle technology, Transp. Res. Rec., 2619, 1, 10.3141/2619-01 · DOI
  33. Pandit, 2013, Adaptive traffic signal control with vehicular Ad Hoc networks, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 62, 1459, 10.1109/TVT.2013.2241460 · DOI
  34. Yu, 2018, Integrated optimisation of traffic signals and vehicle trajectories at isolated urban intersections, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 112, 89, 10.1016/j.trb.2018.04.007 · DOI
  35. Helbing, 2008, Self-control of traffic lights and vehicle flows in urban road networks, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., 2008, P04019
  36. Carlson, 2011, Local feedback-based mainstream traffic flow control on motorways using variable speed limits, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 12, 1261, 10.1109/TITS.2011.2156792 · DOI
  37. Diakaki, 2002, A multivariable regulator approach to traffic-responsive network—Wide signal control, Control Eng. Pract., 10, 183, 10.1016/S0967-0661(01)00121-6 · DOI
  38. Chin, Y.K., Lee, L.K., Yang, S.S., Tze, K., and Teo, K. (2011, January 26–28). Exploring Q-Learning Optimisation in Traffic Signal Timing Plan Management. Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks, Bali, Indonesia. · DOI
  39. Kim, D., and Jeong, O. (2019). Cooperative Traffic Signal Control with Traffic Flow Prediction in Multi-Intersection. Sensors, 20. · DOI
  40. Yang, K., Tan, I., and Menendez, M. (2017, January 17–19). A reinforcement learning-based traffic signal control algorithm in a connected vehicle environment. Proceedings of the 17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2017), Ascona, Switzerland.
  41. Aslani, 2018, Advanced Engineering Informatics Traffic signal optimisation through discrete and continuous reinforcement learning with robustness analysis in downtown Tehran, Adv. Eng. Inform., 38, 639, 10.1016/j.aei.2018.08.002 · DOI
  42. Prabuchandran, K.J., Hemanth Kumar, A.N., and Bhatnagar, S. (2015, January 6–10). Decentralised Learning for Traffic Signal Control. Proceedings of the Intelligent Transportation System Workshop, COMSNETS, Bangalore, India. · DOI
  43. Chen, J., Xue, Z., and Fan, D. (2020). Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Left-Turn Connected and Automated Vehicle Control at Signalized Intersection in Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Environment. Information, 11. · DOI
  44. Liu, 2017, Distributed Cooperative Reinforcement Learning-Based Traffic Signal Control That Integrates V2X Networks’ Dynamic Clustering, Proc. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 66, 8667, 10.1109/TVT.2017.2702388 · DOI
  45. Mousavi, 2017, Traffic light control using deep policy- gradient and value-function-based reinforcement learning, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 11, 417, 10.1049/iet-its.2017.0153 · DOI
  46. van der Pol, E., and Oliehoek, F.A. (2016, January 5–10). Coordinated deep reinforcement learners for traffic light control. Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain.
  47. Nishi, T., Otaki, K., Hayakawa, K., and Yoshimura, T. (2018, January 4–7). Traffic Signal Control Based on Reinforcement Learning with Graph Convolutional Neural Nets. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA. · DOI
  48. Zhao, 2015, Dynamic traffic signal timing optimisation strategy incorporating various vehicle fuel consumption characteristics, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 65, 3874, 10.1109/TVT.2015.2506629 · DOI
  49. Aria, 2016, Investigation of Automated Vehicle Effects on Driver’s Behavior and Traffic Performance, Transp. Res. Procedia, 15, 761, 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.063 · DOI
  50. Stanek, D., Huang, E., and Milam, R.T. (2018, January 7–11). Measuring Autonomous Vehicle Impacts on Congested Networks Using Simulation. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
  51. Asadi, F.E., Anwar, A.K., and Miles, J.C. (2019, January 4–8). Investigating the potential transportation impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the 2019 8th IEEE International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo, ICCVE, Graz, Austria. · DOI
  52. Zeidler, V., Buck, S., Kautzsch, L., Vortisch, P., and Weyland, C. (2019, January 13–17). Simulation of Autonomous Vehicles Based on Wiedemann’s Car Following Model in PTV Vissim. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
  53. Marler, 2005, Function-transformation methods for multi-objective optimisation, Eng. Optim., 37, 551, 10.1080/03052150500114289 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maadi, S., Stein, S., Hong, J., & Murray-Smith, R.
Affiliations
  • Damghan University (IR)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Seoul (KR)
  • School of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Corresponding author
Maadi, Saeed
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-10-03
Volume
22
Issue
19
Pages
7501
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4303981203
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
EPSRC (EP/R018634/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
adaptive traffic signal control, connected and automated vehicles, reinforcement learning, traffic congestion, real-time traffic control, oversaturated traffic
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Autonomous Vehicles, Automobile Driving, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review